Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Helen Macdonald Durham 7th October 2011

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Helen Macdonald Durham 7th October 2011"— Presentation transcript:

1 Helen Macdonald Durham 7th October 2011
Developments in EMDR practice Marbles in the elbow and other stories: Using EMDR in the treatment of persistent pain Helen Macdonald Durham 7th October 2011

2 Developments in EMDR practice: Treatment of persistent pain
Background and context Impact of persistent pain Why using EMDR can help Putting it into practice Choosing targets for change Using imagery Case example Where losing your marbles can help

3 Background and context
Why do EMDR clinicians and researchers take an interest in persistent pain Impact of treating trauma on pain experience How many people we see who have persistent pain Impact of persistent pain on quality of life Effectiveness of current treatments

4 The impact of pain: statistics
Between 10-50% of chronic pain patients meet criteria for PTSD (Sharp 2004) 7.8 million people in the UK have a chronic pain problem - all ages 70% of sufferers are <60. 25% lose their jobs 22% develop depression (Chronic Pain Coalition 2007) Mistaken assumption that anyone exp. a traumatic event will develop PTSD Far from true Results of studies vary but in general confirm that 20% of folks will develop PTSD. AND IN GENERAL POPULATION 7-12% HAVE PTSD Factors that mediate traumatic stress include Preparation for the expected stress Age Belief system - it was my fault, Prior exp with trauma Internal resources - coping skills Support - high level of family dysfx, were they believed, was abuse reported, have they even talked about it Degree of violation-sexual vs. nonsexual Level of threat & fear involved - weapon, aggression

5 The personal experience of pain

6 What do we know about persistent pain?
Pain: “An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience which is due to actual or potential tissue damage, or which is described in terms of such damage” Mersky and Bogduk (1994) Chronic pain ….duration longer than six months (DSM (iv), 1994) Usually refers to non-life-threatening conditions (Cole, Macdonald & Carus 2005)

7 Acute pain: ‘Good’ pain
Designed to protect the body from harm or minimise damage Survival It hurts..... You stop doing it It stops hurting You don’t do it again

8 ‘Bad’ Pain It hurts ?Not helping survival E.g. The story of
You stop doing it It doesn’t stop hurting It doesn’t get better ?Not helping survival E.g. The story of Phantom Limb pain

9 Proposed Role of Memory in persistent pain
Pain encoded as traumatic experience Pre-morbid traumas may be memory-linked to the pain (Grant, 2002) ‘Cognitive map’-body image and somatic experience (Lister, 2003 )

10 Information processing
somatic memory of traumatic experience (pain) chronic pain (Wilensky, 2006) Reprocessing the sensory experiences/ traumatic events facilitate resolution i.e. Re-consolidate memory as less distressing

11 Pain and memory Pain memory isolated from any potential adaptive information Unresolved material easily triggered during similar experiences Intrusive thoughts Emotions Somatic response

12 Effective intervention:
Decreased affect Reducing image vividness

13 Evidence Best evidence: Phantom Limb pain Aborting Migraine attacks
Also: Aborting Migraine attacks Headache Medically Unexplained Symptoms (subjective health complaints) Fibromyalgia

14 Putting it into practice
Own experience: Current or past referral with persistent pain as an issue Impact on functioning Potential targets- past, present, future? What imagery?

15 Putting it into practice
Usual assessment Medication Belief in person’s experience of pain Education on the role of stress in experience of physical symptoms Appropriate management of other issues: Substance misuse Depression Risk

16 Factors to consider Investigations ( and what they mean)
Optimum management of the condition ? E.g. Pain relief medication Exercise/physiotherapy ‘Compliance’ with recommendations? Is the person waiting for more medical input? What does the person believe is happening? The digestive biscuit story

17 Giving rationale for EMDR
Increased coping Changed attitude to the pain Reducing stress/ Relaxation Decreased intensity caution about offering pain reduction as goal

18 Choosing a Target for EMDR: Past situations
‘What best represents this for you?’ Specific image or memory Trauma Pain related targets Personal and physical constraints Impact on life Medical interventions Pain memories Location of sensation(s) Responses of others

19 Choosing a Target for EMDR: Present situations
Personal circumstances Having needs met Impact on daily life

20 Choosing a Target for EMDR: Future situations
Thoughts and feelings about pain and future Impact of pain on: Family Social life Occupation Economic circumstances Medical

21 Specific Antidote imagery: targeting the pain itself
deRoos and Veenstra (2009) Image of current pain sensation Think of something that could take the pain away or make it better – ‘antidote fantasy’ Imagery of healing Using ‘antidote imagery’ Hoping for change in sensation Evidence that there are changes in image and sensation

22 Case example 47-year old man, involved in an RTA near to his workplace
Severe damage to his arm, resulting in: scarring reduced function persistent pain Occupational and relationship changes

23 Case example: Marbles in the elbow
‘Bag of marbles’ Image of current pain sensation

24 What could take the pain away?
Medical treatment to make the elbow as it was before Antidote ‘fantasy’ Image: X-ray

25 Case example continued
EMDR using the antidote image Resources Reduction in pain Acceptance Increased functioning

26 Developments in EMDR practice for Pain
High level of unmet need: people in pain EMDR can facilitate changes in how pain is experienced somatically and emotionally. Specifically working with imagery and developing an ‘antidote’ can add to EMDR interventions with pain targets

27 Developments in EMDR practice:
Limitations: Need for greater sample sizes in research More consistent rigour in research Need for better explanations of mechanism Pain can get worse, particularly at first

28 Developments in EMDR practice
Thank you Any Questions? Helen Macdonald 2011

29 References Grant, M and Thelfro, C., (2002) EMDR in the treatment of chronic pain, in J. Clin. Psychol, Dec;58(12): Grant, M ( 2001) Pain control with EMDR; a practitioner’s manual, New Hope Hassard, A. (1995). Investigation of eye movement desensitization in pain clinic clients. Behavioral & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23 (2), Hekmat, H., Groth, S. & Rogers, D. (1994) Pain ameliorating effect of eye movement desensitization. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, Lister, D (2003) Correcting the Cognitive Map with EMDR: A Possible Neurobiological Mechanism, O’Keefe, J and Nadel L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford University Press Rothschild, B ( 2000) The Body Remembers Van den Hout et al (2010) Counting during recall: Taxing of working memory and reduced vividness and emotionality of negative memories in: Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 no Van der Kolk, B, (1994) The body keeps the score. Vanderlaan, L. (2000). The resolution of phantom limb pain in a 15-year old girl using eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. EMDR Clinician


Download ppt "Helen Macdonald Durham 7th October 2011"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google