Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering"— Presentation transcript:

1 ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department 2nd Semester 2008/2009 ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering Lecture 5

2 Content Bearing Capacity Concepts Analysis for Shallow Foundations

3 Bearing Capacity Failures
Modes of Soil Failure: General shear failure Local shear failure Punching shear failure

4 Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Formulas

5 General Shear Failure

6 Local Shear Failure

7 Punching Shear Failure

8 Model Tests - Vesic (1973)

9 General Guidelines Footings on clays - general shear
Footings on dense sands (> 70%) - general shear Footings on loose to medium dense - local shear Footings on very loose sand (< 35%) - punching shear

10 Terzaghi’s Basic Assumptions
D  B No sliding between footing and soil Soil is a homogeneous semi-infinite mass General shear failure Footing is very rigid compared to soil

11 Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Formulas General Shear Failure
For Continuous foundations: For Square foundations: For Circular foundations:

12 Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors General Shear Failure

13 Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Formulas Local Shear Failure

14 Modified General Ultimate Bearing Capacity Formula

15 Modified General Ultimate Bearing Capacity Formula

16 Modified General Ultimate Bearing Capacity Formula

17 Modified General Ultimate Bearing Capacity Formula

18 Modified General Ultimate Bearing Capacity Formula

19 Effect of GWT Level

20 Effect of GWT Level Case I: 0 ≤ D1 ≤ Df

21 Effect of GWT Level Case II: 0 ≤ d ≤ B

22 Effect of GWT Level Case III: d > B

23 Selection of Soil Strength Parameters
Use saturated strength parameters Use undrained strength in clays (cu) Use drained strength in sands For intermediate soils with partially drained conditions, undrained shear strength can be used but it will be conservative

24 Other Approaching Methods
Skempton (1951) Meyerhof (1953, 1963) De Beer and Ladanyi (1961) Brinch Hanson (1961, 1970) Vesic (1973, 1975) Others

25 Factor of Safety Depends on: Type of soil
Level of uncertainty in soil strength Importance of structure Consequences of failure Likelihood of design load occurrence

26 Factor of Safety Gross Allowable Bearing Capacity
Net Allowable Bearing Capacity

27 Factor of Safety

28 Design Factor of Safety

29 Example 1 Use Terzaghi’s formula to determine the gross allowable load for the square footing shown below at a general shear failure condition with no GWT effect. Take Nc = 17.69, Nq = 7.44, N = 3.64, and FS = 3.0.

30 Example 1 - Solution

31 Example 2 Redo the previuos example under a local shear failure condition with no GWT effect. Use Terzaghi’s formula. Take Nc = 11.85, Nq = 3.88, N = 1.12, and FS = 3.0.

32 Example 2 - Solution

33 Example 3 Refer to the previous example to determine the net allowable load. Use Terzaghi’s formula. Take FS = 3.0.

34 Example 3 - Solution

35 Example 4 Determine the breadth of the square footing shown below using Terzaghi’s formula to withstand a gross mass of 30 tons with no GWT level effects. Nc = 57.75, Nq = 41.44, N = 45.41, and FS = 3.0.

36 Example 4 - Solution

37 Example 5 Determine the required breadth of a square footing using the general bearing capacity formula to withstand a gross load of 150 kN at a depth of 0.7 m with no GWT level effects. The applied load is inclined at angle of 20º to the vertical. c’ = 0, ’ = 30º,  = 18 kN/m3, Nq = 18.40, N = 22.40, and FS = 3.0.

38 Example 5 - Solution

39 Example 5 - Solution

40 Example 5 - Solution

41 Example 5 - Solution

42 Example 6 Determine the safe gross vertical loading for the square footing shown below using Terzaghi’s formula. Take Nq = 23.18, N = 22.02, and FS = 3.0.

43 Example 6 - Solution


Download ppt "ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google