Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Achieving Excellence in HIgher Education in the United States with the Baldrige Criteria Robert Sedlak, Provost University of Wisconsin-Stout Achieving.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Achieving Excellence in HIgher Education in the United States with the Baldrige Criteria Robert Sedlak, Provost University of Wisconsin-Stout Achieving."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Achieving Excellence in HIgher Education in the United States with the Baldrige Criteria Robert Sedlak, Provost University of Wisconsin-Stout Achieving Excellence in Education Conference Gebze, Turkey September 6, 2002

3 Excellence in Higher Education Improving Overall Performance

4 Fewer than 50 Organizations have Received the Award Since 1989 –Selected Recipients Include: Motorola, Inc. 1988 Xerox Corp, Business Products 1989 Cadillac Motor Car Division 1990 IBM Rochester 1990 Zytec Corp 1991 The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co. 1992 Eastman Chemical Co. 1993 Corning Telecommunications Product Division 1995 Merrill Lynch Credit Corp. 1997 STMicroelectronics 1999 Los Alamos National Bank 2000 University of Wisconsin-Stout 2001

5 Facts About UW-Stout  27 undergraduate and 16 graduate degree programs  $95M budget  8,000 students with 1,200 faculty and staff UW-Stout (11) 4-year campuses (13) 2-year campuses (2) Doctoral campuses Chicago Madison Minneapolis St. Paul

6 Baldrige Core Values  Systems Perspective  Visionary Leadership  Learning-Centered Education  Organizational Learning  Valuing Employees & Partners  Agility  Future Focus  Managing for Innovation  Management by Fact  Public Responsibility  Focus on Results

7 Baldrige Categories  Leadership  Strategic Planning  Market, Student and Stakeholder Focus  Faculty and Staff Focus  Information and Analysis  Process Management  Performance Results

8

9 The Setting  UW System and Board of Regents adopted Baldrige criteria  Extensive campus training on TQM tools  Cross-functional TQM teams operating in over 20 areas  Historically data-driven organization but planning was decentralized and fragmented Between 1990 to 1996 UW-Stout developed quality tools

10 The Setting  Budget cuts  Need to fund new technology infrastructure  Pressure to be efficient  Pressure to continually improve  Pressure to be accountable UW-Stout environment in the mid-1990’s

11 Perceptions And Realities  High levels of stress  Poor faculty morale  Lack of communication  Declining levels of trust  Lose-Lose; Win-Lose; but no Win-Win decision-making  Suspicion

12 What We Did  Realized we had serious problems and resolved to address them  Listened to the faculty and staff on what needed to be fixed  Addressed areas of their concern first to achieve buy-in  Committed time

13 Changes We Made Revolutionary Changes  Created a new leadership system  Created budget, planning, and analysis unit  Revamped annual budget and planning processes  Initiated team building with senior leaders  Improved communication

14 Leadership Systems: An Environment for Transformational Change Change To An Inclusive Decision-Making Process Provide all internal stakeholder groups with a voice in policy discussions and budget recommendations -Faculty Senate -Senate of Academic Staff -Stout Student Association -Classified Staff Unions -Senior Administration “Shared Governance = Shared Responsibility”

15  Flattens the traditional hierarchy  Makes recommendations to Chancellor, sets direction, and deploys resources  Budget, Planning and Analysis unit formed  Prepares, interprets, and provides information needed to make effective decisions Leadership Systems: Chancellor’s Advisory Council

16 Chancellor’s Advisory Council Allows Us To:  Enable campus-wide involvement and participation in strategy development and decision-making  Plan and review performance  Guide alignment and integration of short- and long-term actions  Aid in assessment of results and improve performance  Enhance organizational performance through team building

17 Strategic Planning Intended Outcomes:  Facilitate planning and discussion  Encourage participation  Improve the quality of decisions and buy-in  Build a trusting climate  Increase understanding of plan and budget  Strategically focus on campus Planning Budget Budgetary And Financial Planning

18 Strategic Planning Strategic Budgetary And Financial Planning  The strategic plan includes five-year goals and shorter-term action plans  Broad-based participatory planning is used to identify, set, and fund campus priorities  Review of progress at all levels  The strategic plan aligns resources and actions leading to desired results levels of the campus Planning Budget

19 Chancellor’s Advisory Council Summer Retreats Fall Focus Groups Fall/Winter Chancellor’s Advisory Council Budget Planning Winter Budget Planning at Division/College Level Chancellor Communicates Final Plan Institution-Wide Strategic Planning Developing Annual Budget Priorities Chancellor’s Advisory Council Summer Retreats Fall Focus Groups Fall/Winter Chancellor’s Advisory Council Budget Planning Winter Budget Planning at Division/College Level Chancellor Communicates Final Plan Institution-Wide

20 Strategic Planning Annual Budget Priorities  Branding and Marketing  Digital Campus  Equality for Women  Graduate Education  Distance Education  Applied Research

21 Creating a Quality Culture: Keys to Success Teamwork Communication Information Morale

22 Keys To Success: Communication WEB GOVERNANCE & DEPARTMENTAL MEETINGS CAMPUS-WIDE MAILINGS LISTENING POSTS NEWSLETTERS OPEN FORUMS

23 A traditional hierarchy, complemented by set of established committees and other cross-functional structures  Chancellor’s Advisory Council  Faculty Senate committees  Senate of Academic Staff committees  University-wide committees Keys To Success: Teamwork

24 Keys To Success: Information  Access to data  Analysis by BPA  Computing power  Networking  Internet  Training

25 Full survey every three years One-minute survey on alternate years Keys to Success: Faculty and Staff Satisfaction Lead To Morale SurveysChanges Faculty teaching workload Communication Gender equity

26 Academic Program Review Process Educational Support Unit Review Process Process for Process Improvement Process Management

27 Process Management: The Digital Campus Initiative  Upgraded technology: state-of-the-art network  University computer cost-share program  Implementation of laptop environment  Hired instructional web designers

28 Next Steps – The Journey Continues  Face new challenges optimistically  Remember we are excellent but not perfect  Help others in the journey

29


Download ppt "Achieving Excellence in HIgher Education in the United States with the Baldrige Criteria Robert Sedlak, Provost University of Wisconsin-Stout Achieving."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google