Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

By Fourth Group Members: Nopel Sahrul Putra E1D 107 078 Siti Lathipatul Hikmah E1D 110 116 Zahrina Kartika E1D 110047 HOMONYMY AND POLYSEMY.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "By Fourth Group Members: Nopel Sahrul Putra E1D 107 078 Siti Lathipatul Hikmah E1D 110 116 Zahrina Kartika E1D 110047 HOMONYMY AND POLYSEMY."— Presentation transcript:

1 By Fourth Group Members: Nopel Sahrul Putra E1D 107 078 Siti Lathipatul Hikmah E1D 110 116 Zahrina Kartika E1D 110047 HOMONYMY AND POLYSEMY

2 HOMONYMY The word "homonym" comes from the conjunction of the Greek :  prefix homo-, meaning "same", and  suffix -ṓnymos, meaning "name". Homonymy is one of a group of words that share the same spelling and pronunciation, but have different meaning.

3 1. Homography: identical spelling and different meaning e.g. Bow 2.Homophony: different spelling and similar pronunciation. E.g feet and feat Generally, Homonymy is expressed in two broadways:

4 Full homonyms are identical in sound in all their forms of paradigms of two or more different words: Example: Sole 1 means bottom of shoe and Sole 2 means kind of fish. Full homonymy may be found in different parts of speech E.g. For [fo:] — preposition, for [fo:] — conjunction, four [fo:] — numeral, These parts of speech have no other word-forms. CLASSIFICATIONS OF HOMONYMS

5 -is identical only in some of the forms : -Examples : to find to found found founded know no knows nose knew new Partial homonymy

6 Lexical Homonyms, example, trunk (part of an elephant) and trunk (a storage chest). Grammatical Homonyms, Verbs occurring as transitive and intransitive or lexical units that occur as nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc. (e.g. cut (v.), cut (n.), cut (adj.)) are examples of such homonyms (ibid.). Lexico-grammatical homonyms, have no link between their lexical meaning and belong to different part of speech. Ex : tear (N)-tear (V) bear - bare Continue…..

7 Refers to cases where a lexeme (word) has more than one meaning but related sense. Example: - “a chip” : a piece of wood, food, or electronic circuit -” capitalist” : person who owns a business, supporter of capitalism; person who owns a business - “ head “: part of the body above neck, person in charge of an organisation POLYSEMY

8 Type of polysemy Polysemy motivated by metaphor refers to a relationship in which a core sense ‘moves’ to something ‘nearby’. example: the foot of a sock is the part that covers the foot. As a measurement of length Polysemy motivated by metonymy refers to a relationship in which the new sense involves an analogy or a jump of imagination. example: foot can also refer to the bottom part of something that does not actually have feet, e.g. the foot of a mountain or the foot of a ladder.

9 Homonymy vs Polysemy In semantic analysis, the theoretical distinction between homonymy and polysemy creates a problem that has captivated the attention of many linguists. Polysemy (polly- seamus in Latin) is defined roughly as the existence of one lexeme with many related meanings. The fact that polysemy is a property of single words is what differentiates it from homonymy in principle (Lyons 1982:146). For instance, the words neck, guard, music, and bachelor are polysemous since each one of them appears in standard dictionaries of English as a single lexeme with several distinguishable meanings, whereas homonyms generally have separate dictionary entries often marked with superscripts 1, 2, and so forth. (Fromkin et al. 2003: 180).

10 Differences between polysemy and homonymy CriteriapolysemyHomonymr Existence Word level StructureSingle formSimilar form OrthographyDo not vary in spellingMay vary in spelling UtterenceMostly due to contextDue to meaning and ethimology ContextPlays in vital roleHas No role to play

11 Conclusion Homonymy is the group of words which are similar in spelling and/or prounonciation but different in meaning.However, polysemy is the single word which has different meaning. In polysemy, the different sense of single item re seen as being related in some non-trivial way, whereas in homonymy, the multiple encoding is a matter of historical accident.

12 Reference Dash, Niladri Sekhar. Polysemy and homonymy: A Conceptual Labyrinth. Kolkata Klepousniotou, Ekaterini. 2001. The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Homonymy and Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Canada: Published online https://webspace.utexas.edu/wechsler/Krifka 06Polysmy.pdf?uniq=-sgaq17 https://webspace.utexas.edu/wechsler/Krifka 06Polysmy.pdf?uniq=-sgaq17 http://www.idealibrary.com

13 Thanks For Your Attention


Download ppt "By Fourth Group Members: Nopel Sahrul Putra E1D 107 078 Siti Lathipatul Hikmah E1D 110 116 Zahrina Kartika E1D 110047 HOMONYMY AND POLYSEMY."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google