Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Modeling the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Cuba Presented by Raluca Amariei and Audrey Pereira 2005 PIMS Mathematical Biology Summer School.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Modeling the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Cuba Presented by Raluca Amariei and Audrey Pereira 2005 PIMS Mathematical Biology Summer School."— Presentation transcript:

1 Modeling the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Cuba Presented by Raluca Amariei and Audrey Pereira 2005 PIMS Mathematical Biology Summer School

2 Outline Introduction to HIV HIV in Cuba Models Analysis of Models Output of Model III Fitting Model III to Data Extensions to the Model Conclusions

3 HIV the Virus In 2000: 36.1 million people living with HIV 390 000 in the Caribbean region Only 3230 cases in Cuba (Cuba's 0.03% infection rate is one of the lowest in the world) HIV - human immunodeficiency virus that causes Acquired Immuno- Deficiency Syndrome AIDS - weakness in the body's system that fights diseases (CD4+ cell percentage is less than 14% )

4 HIV in Cuba National Programme on HIV/AIDS established by the Cuban government in 1983: Testing blood donations Hospital surveillance - screening of patients with other STD’s, pregnant women, other hospital patients HIV screening for travellers to other countries

5 HIV in Cuba HIV seropositives placed in sanatoriums Partner Notification Programme – contact tracing and screening of sexual partners Increase in the HIV cases due to growth of tourism after 1996 Negative impact of US Embargo on Cuban Health Services

6 Model I - Parameters b = birth rate; d = death rate τ 1 = probability of acquiring HIV when in contact with an HIV+ τ 2 = probability of acquiring HIV when in contact with an AIDS sufferer k = conversion rate of HIV to AIDS (incubation period = 9 yrs) d’ = death rate for AIDS sufferers S H A b D d’ d d d τ2τ2 τ1τ1 k

7 Model I (1) S’ = b(S+H+A) - τ 1 SH - τ 2 SA - dS (2) H’ = τ 1 SH + τ 2 SA - kH - dH (3) A’ = kH – d’A – dA (4) D’ = d’A N = S + H + A = constant (b=d) → N’ = 0 → S’+H’+A’ = 0 → d’=0 Equations: No deaths from AIDS

8 Analysis of Model I Equilibrium Points: From (3): A = kH/d In (2), case (i) H = 0 → A = 0 → S = N Disease Free Equilibrium is: DFE = (N, 0, 0)

9 Analysis of Model I In (2), case (ii) H ≠ 0 divide (2) by H: τ 1 S + τ 2 kSH/d - k - d = 0 → S* = (k+d)/( τ 1 + τ 2 k/d)

10 Analysis of Model I Plug (2) and (3) in (1): H* = (d-b)S/(b+bk/d-k-d) But b=d → H* = 0. Contradiction. → there is no endemic equilibrium

11 Stability Jacobian Matrix: -τ 1 H-τ 2 Ab-τ 1 Sb-τ 2 S τ 1 H+τ 2 Aτ 1 S-k-dτ2Sτ2S 0k-d J =

12 Stability of the DFE: Jacobian Matrix at the DFE=(N, 0, 0): 0b-τ 1 Sb-τ 2 N 0τ 1 N-k-dτ2Nτ2N 0k-d J(DFE) =

13 Stability of the DFE: Eigenvalues One eigenvalue is 0: λ 1 = 0 The other two are found using the 2x2 matrix: τ 1 N-k-dτ2Nτ2N k-d Characteristic polynomial is λ 2 – tr(J’) λ + det(J’) = 0 J’ =

14 Stability of the DFE: Eigenvalues: λ 2 + (k+2d- τ 1 N)λ + d(k+d- τ 1 N)-k τ 2 N = 0 By Routh-Hurwicz Criterion (n=2), roots have negative real part when : k+2d- τ 1 N > 0 d(k+d- τ 1 N)-k τ 2 N > 0 R0R0 R 0 – the number of new infections determined by one infective introduced in a susceptible population ↔ DFE is locally asymptotically stable ↔ k τ 2 N / [d(k+d- τ 1 N)] < 1

15 Model II Assumptions: N not constant → b ≠ d. Let λ = b – d N’ = (b - d)N = λN → N(t) = N(0)e λt Let n(t) = e -λt N(t)= e -λt ( S(t) + H(t) + A(t) ) Apply the transformations for all classes: s(t) = e -λt S(t) h(t) = e -λt H(t) a(t) = e -λt A(t) d(t) = e -λt D(t) And then n(t) = s(t) + h(t) + a(t)

16 Model II Transformation of H(t): h(t) = e -λt H(t) h’(t) = -λe -λt H(t) + e -λt H’(t) = -λh(t) + e -λt ( τ 1 SH/N + τ 2 SA/N - kH - dH) = -bh - kh+ τ 1 sh/n + τ 2 sa/n Using standard incidence H/N and S/N

17 Model II s’(t) = bh + ba - τ 1 sh/n - τ 2 sa/n h’(t) = - bh - kh + τ 1 sh/n + τ 2 sa/n a’(t) = - ba + kh - d’a Equations: n = s + h + a n’ = s’ + h’ + a’ n’ = - d’a n(t) → 0

18 Model II Equilibrium Points: Still no endemic equilibrium (obtain contradiction) Disease Free Equilibrium: DFE = (n*, 0, 0)

19 Model II Stability of the DFE=(n*, 0, 0): One eigenvalue λ 1 = 0 and λ 2 + (2b+k+d’– τ 1 )λ + (b+d’)(b+k- τ 1 )-k τ 2 = 0 Routh-Hurwicz Criterion: (2b+k+d’– τ 2 ) > 0 (b+d’)(b+k- τ 1 )-k τ 2 > 0

20 Model II Therefore the DFE is stable when: (b+d’)(b+k- τ 1 )-k τ 2 > 0 ↕ k τ 2 /[(b+d’)(b+k- τ 1 )] < 1 R0R0 Comparison: ( I ) R 0 = k τ 2 N / [b(k+b- τ 1 N)] ( II ) R 0 = k τ 2 / [(b+d’)(b+k- τ 1 )]

21 Model III Equations: (1) S’ = b(S+H+A) - τ 1 SH - τ 2 SA - dS (2) H’ = τ 1 SH + τ 2 SA - kH - dH (3) A’ = kH – d’A – dA (3) D’ = d’A Assumptions: N not constant → b ≠ d

22 Model III – Equilibria Endemic Equilibrium: H ≠ 0: From (3): A = kH/(d+d’) From (2): S = (k+d)/[ τ 1 + τ 2 k/(d+d’)] Substitute in (1): H = (b-d)(k+d)/[(k+d-b-bk/(d+d’))( τ 1 + τ 2 k/(d+d’))] N not constant → no DFE

23 Model III Endemic Equilibrium: S* = (k+d)/[ τ 1 + τ 2 k/(d+d’)] H* = (b-d)(k+d)/[(k+d-b-bk/(d+d’))( τ 1 + τ 2 k/(d+d’))] A* = kH*/(d+d’)

24 Model III: Stability of the Endemic Equilibrium Jacobian matrix written in Maple:

25 Model III: Stability of the Endemic Equilibrium Characteristic Polynomial given by Maple: By Routh-Hurwicz Criterion (n=3), the endemic equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when: a > 0, c > 0, ab > c x 3 + ax 2 + bx + c = 0

26 Data YearHIV+AIDSDeaths due to AIDS 19869952 198775114 198893146 1989121135 19901402823 19911833717 19921757132 19931028259 199412210262 199512411680 19962349992 199736312999 199836215098 1999493176122 2000545251142 Total32311284874 Given data: 1986-2000 New HIV Cases New Aids Cases Deaths each year from AIDS

27 Data

28 Fitting Model III to Data HIV Cases AIDS Cases Deaths from AIDS Legend: Given data Solution Curves of Model III

29 Fitting Model III to Data Parameters: b = 0.114 d = 0.073 τ 1 = 0.15x10 -5 τ 2 = 0.12x10 -6 k = 0.165 d’ = 0.195

30 Conclusions I: Problems Time Limitations In simulations In model development Discrete Model? Stochastic Model?

31 Extensions to the Model Suggestions for improvement: Females / Males Heterosexual / Homosexual (it started as a heterosexual disease, now 90% of seropositives are males) Exposed class - not infectious right away Include the people infected but unaware (an estimate of 20-30% of the HIV asymptomatic carriers have not been detected) Different number of sexual partners (differentiation between probabilities of transmission)

32 Extensions to the Model Suggestions for improvement: F S E D Hu A Ha Mh M Approximately 18 equations...

33 Conclusions: 3,200 HIV cases in Cuba Comparison with Canada in 2003: In Ontario - approximately same population as Cuba (12 million), but 23,863 HIV cases 12,156 HIV cases in Quebec (7 million) 11,346 HIV cases in British Columbia (3 million) 5 times more cases in QC 8 times more cases in ON 13 times more cases in BC

34 References 1. H de Arazoza and R. Lounes 2002. A non-linear model for a sexually transmitted disease with contact tracing. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. Sep;19(3):221-34. 2. R. Lounes and H. de Arazoza 1999. A two-type model for the Cuban national programme on HIV/AIDS. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. Jun;16(2):143-54. 3. Y.H Hsieh, de Arazoza H., Lee S.M., Chen C.W. Estimating the number of Cubans infected sexually by human immunodeficiency virus using contact tracing data. Int J Epidemiol. Jun;31(3):679-83. 4. BBC: Cuba leads the way in HIV fight. 2003 M. Bentley. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2003/denver_2003/2770631.stm

35 Thank you


Download ppt "Modeling the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Cuba Presented by Raluca Amariei and Audrey Pereira 2005 PIMS Mathematical Biology Summer School."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google