Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COLOR VISION © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COLOR VISION © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 COLOR VISION © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

2 COLOR VISION “The Color Story” is a prototype for Cognitive Science
Contributions from: Physics (Newton) Philosophy (Locke) Art (Munsell) Psychophysics (Maxwell) Physiology (De Valois) Cognitive Psychology (Rosch) Neurology (Zeki) Linguistics (Lakoff) Cognitive Anthropology (Berlin & Kay) Computer Science (Zadeh) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

3 COLOR VISION “The Color Story” is a prototype for Cognitive Science
Contributions from: * Berkeley faculty Physics (Newton) Philosophy (Locke) Art (Munsell) Psychophysics (Maxwell) Physiology (De Valois) Cognitive Psychology (Rosch) Neurology (Zeki) Linguistics (Lakoff) Cognitive Anthropology (Berlin & Kay) Computer Science (Zadeh) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

4 The Physics of Light Light: Electromagnetic energy whose
wavelength is between 400 nm and 700 nm. (1 nm = 10 meter) -6 © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

5 The Physics of Light Some examples of the spectra of light sources
© Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

6 The Physics of Light Some examples of the reflectance spectra of surfaces Red Yellow Blue Purple % Photons Reflected Wavelength (nm) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

7 The Psychophysical Correspondence
There is no simple functional description for the perceived color of all lights under all viewing conditions, but …... A helpful constraint: Consider only physical spectra with normal distributions mean area variance © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

8 The Psychophysical Correspondence
Mean Hue # Photons Wavelength © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

9 The Psychophysical Correspondence
Variance Saturation Wavelength # Photons © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

10 The Psychophysical Correspondence
Area Brightness # Photons Wavelength © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

11 Physiology of Color Vision
Two types of light-sensitive receptors Cones cone-shaped less sensitive operate in high light color vision Rods rod-shaped highly sensitive operate at night gray-scale vision © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

12 The Microscopic View

13 Rods and Cones in the Retina

14 What Rods and Cones Detect
Notice how they aren’t distributed evenly, and the rod is more sensitive to shorter wavelengths

15 Center / Surround Strong activation in center, inhibition on surround
The effect you get using these center / surround cells is enhanced edges top: the stimuli itself middle: brightness of the stimuli bottom: response of the retina You’ll see this idea get used in Regier’s model

16 How They Fire No stimuli: Stimuli in center: Stimuli in surround:
both fire at base rate Stimuli in center: ON-center-OFF-surround fires rapidly OFF-center-ON-surround doesn’t fire Stimuli in surround: OFF-center-ON-surround fires rapidly ON-center-OFF-surround doesn’t fire Stimuli in both regions: both fire slowly

17 Theories of Color Vision
Two main algorithmic theories of color vision: Trichromatic Theory (Palmer/Young/Helmholtz) Hermann von Helmholtz Opponent Process Theory (Hering) Ewald Hering © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

18 Physiology of Color Vision
Three kinds of cones: Absorption spectra Opponent Processes: R/G = L-M G/R = M-L B/Y = S-(M+L) Y/B = (M+L)-S Implementation of Trichromatic theory © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

19 Physiology of Color Vision
Opponent-Process Cells in LGN (De Valois) Implementation of opponent process theory (Similar color behavior in retinal ganglion cells) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

20 Physiology of Color Vision
Double Opponent Cells in V1 G+R- R+G- Red/Green Y+B- B+Y- Blue/Yellow © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

21 What numbers do you see in these displays?
Color Blindness Not everybody perceives colors in the same way! What numbers do you see in these displays? © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

22 Color Blindness There are several forms of inherited variations
of color vision. Trichromatic (“normal”) color vision Dichromatic color vision 2 forms of red-green color blindness 1 form of yellow-blue color blindness Monochromatic color vision 4 forms Various forms of “color weakness” © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

23 Color Blindness What does the world look like to a color blind person?
Normal Trichromat Protanope Deuteranope Tritanope © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

24 Theories of Color Vision
Opponent Process theory (Hering): All colors are combinations of responses in three underlying bipolar systems (Red/Green, Blue/Yellow, Black/White). © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

25 Theories of Color Vision
Dual Process Theory (Hurvich & Jameson): The color vision system contains two stages: an initial trichromatic stage and a later opponent-process stage. Trichromatic stage Opponent- Process stage Dual Process Theory © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

26 Theories of Color Vision
A Dual Process Wiring Diagram Trichromatic Stage Opponent Process Stage © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

27 Surface-based processing
COLOR VISION: Part 4 1. Color Constancy: Surface-based processing 2. Color Naming: Category-based processing © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

28 Color Constancy Color Constancy: the ability to perceive the
invariant color of a surface despite ecological Variations in the conditions of observation. Another inverse problem: Physics of light emission and surface reflection underdetermine perception of surface color © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

29 Color Constancy Iw Lw Rw © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

30 Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

31 Color Constancy Two approaches to lightness constancy
Unconscious Inference (Helmholtz) Luminance = Intensity * Reflectance If you know L and I, you can solve for R! Invariant Relations (Hering) Luminance ratios are invariant with illumination © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

32 Luminance ratio is invariant over illumination:
Color Constancy Luminance ratio is invariant over illumination: Luminance Ratio = 9:1 Luminance Ratio = 9:1 © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

33 Color Constancy The anchoring problem: What about absolute lightness?
How do we know what is white? (How big is the anchor???) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

34 Anchoring heuristic: The lightest region is taken as white

35 Surface-based processing
COLOR VISION: Part 4 1. Color Constancy: Surface-based processing 2. Color Naming: Category-based processing © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

36 Basic Color Terms (Berlin & Kay)
Color Naming Basic Color Terms (Berlin & Kay) Criteria: 1. Single words -- not “light-blue” or “blue-green” 2. Frequently used -- not “mauve” or “cyan” 3. Refer primarily to colors -- not “lime” or “gold” 4. Apply to any object -- not “roan” or “blond” © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

37 Color Naming BCTs in English Red Green Blue Yellow Black White Gray
Brown Purple Orange* Pink © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

38 Color Naming Five more BCTs in a study of 98 languages Light-Blue Warm
Cool Light-Warm Dark-Cool © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

39 The WCS Color Chips Basic color terms: Single word (not blue-green)
Frequently used (not mauve) Refers primarily to colors (not lime) Applies to any object (not blonde) FYI: English has 11 basic color terms

40 Results of Kay’s Color Study
Stage I II IIIa / IIIb IV V VI VII W or R or Y W Bk or G or Bu R or Y R G or Bu Y Bk G Bu Y+Bk (Brown) R+W (Pink) R + Bu (Purple) R+Y (Orange) B+W (Grey) If you group languages into the number of basic color terms they have, as the number of color terms increases, additional terms specify focal colors

41 Color Naming Typical “developmental” sequence of BCTs
© Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

42 Focal Colors Color Naming Studied color categories in two ways
(Berlin & Kay) Focal Colors Studied color categories in two ways Boundaries Best examples © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

43 Prototypes Color Naming (Rosch) MEMORY :
Focal colors are remembered better than nonfocal colors. LEARNING: New color categories centered on focal colors are learned faster. Categorization: Focal colors are categorized more quickly than nonfocal colors. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

44 Color Naming A fuzzy logical model of color naming (Kay & Mc Daniel)
Degree of Membership A fuzzy logical model of color naming (Kay & Mc Daniel) Fuzzy set theory (Zadeh) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

45 “Primary” color categories
Color Naming “Primary” color categories © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

46 “Primary” color categories
Color Naming “Primary” color categories Red Green Blue Yellow Black White © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

47 “Derived” color categories
Color Naming “Derived” color categories Fuzzy logical “ANDf” © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

48 “Derived” color categories
Color Naming “Derived” color categories Orange = Red ANDf Yellow Purple = Red ANDf Blue Gray = Black ANDf White Pink = Red ANDf White Brown = Yellow ANDf Black (Goluboi = Blue ANDf White) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

49 “Composite” color categories
Color Naming “Composite” color categories Fuzzy logical “ORf” Warm = Red Orf Yellow Cool = Blue Orf Green Light-warm = White Orf Warm Dark-cool = Black Orf Cool © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

50 Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002


Download ppt "COLOR VISION © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google