1. Part 3 A special section for Dr. Kanda and Stephen Hawking … i admire them both for different reasons. Dr. Kanda has been a continuing, reasonable, and logical participant here in the NPA. Mr. Hawking has developed 'black hole theory' to what may be called 'a fine art' much like Michelangelo..

2. However, even Mr. Hawking states....himself that his theory may have no connection with reality – at all.. (see The Nature of Space and Time) So he admits the possibility he may be 'building castles in the sky' with no connection to reality....Mr. Hawking has devoted a large section of his professional life to black hole theory.. He's considered only 'second to Einstein'..

3. 'only 2 nd to Einstein' as perhaps the 'greatest mind' of modern times.. i agree, both of them were/are great thinkers of our time.. Both deep thinkers about physics.. … Dr. Kanda claims SR is based on inconsistent logic.. Perhaps so.. But, if I say “oranges are orange because orangutans made them orange” does not make the premise wrong: oranges are orange. Perhaps SR is logically inconsistent - i admit that. But one of the consequences of SR is..

4. One of the consequences of SR is “time slows down for speedy craft” (relative to you at rest). If we dismiss SR as 'wrong', we also dismiss this consequence of SR.. Just so happens, the Other Model can explain this effect consistently (key word: consistently). Another piece of evidence this effect of SR is real is our observations of accelerated nuclei: when we accelerate unstable nuclei close to the speed of light, they are observed to take longer to decay – relative to those at rest. This effect is well established.

5. So oranges are not oranges because orangutans 'say so', they're simply orange. “Time slows down for speedy craft” not because SR says so, but because TR says so. ;)..And Stephen Hawking wasted his professional life on black holes why? Because black holes are totally misunderstood in relation to 'the rest of our universe'...If the OM has any basis in reality, if we indeed live in 3 space dimensions only and one unidirectional causal time,....If there are no hidden dimensions,..

6. If there are no hidden dimensions to spacetime.. If there is no such thing as 'holographic space'.. If elementary particles are not inherently random.. If forces are not mediated by virtual exchange.. If science has been led astray for 100 years.. If the politics of science has controlled the directions of science.. rather than objectivity, rationality, and reason,.. then we are on the verge of a REVOLUTION in science and YOU can be a part of it!

7. I GUARANTEE YOU: If you band together at this time (instead of squabbling as we seem to be doing),.. If you present a 'united front' to convention (with the NPA – having a unified voice toward convention),.. i guarantee: 1. you will have more funding for your research 2. more respect for your person 3. more support for your families 4. a happier and more fulfilled life

8. Now i'm not saying you must 'back me up' with the Other Model.. i may be wrong.. i may be 'nuts'.. But as time progresses, as we find no evidence for the Higgs or gravitational waves,.. We need a coherent, consistent, simple, and hopefully elegant model to present 'the general public' as a viable alternative to the Standard Model – when it fails. If not the Other Model, then another coherent, consistent, simple, and hopefully elegant model describing reality – provided by the NPA.

9. Why NPA? Why not? It must be somebody / some organization. Why not NPA? Don't you think the 'general public' will be at least a little bit grateful to 'batman' when he rescues them from 'the joker'? When they realize they've been conned for 100 years?! It's a betrayal of public trust! Wake up and realize this historic opportunity.

10. More than just realize it.. Grab it by the horns.. Grab 'that old devil' and make him pay.. ;)..For his deception of humankind....For our squandering of resources on fantasy....For letting ourselves get led astray.. … Grab that 'old devil' and kick him off the planet...What do we have to lose? except our..

11. Except our: Delusional tendencies so well expressed by the Standard Model Wasting resources on things like the LHC..Resources better spent on things like: ITER (an international attempt at controlled fusion) Life sciences probes to Mars and Europa Manned exploration of space..Need i go on?

12. NPA don't miss your chance. This is a historic chance to improve science. To participate in scientific discovery/inquiry. To forge completely new branches of science. To be a part of history. … The OM may be wrong.. But we must take a stand in order to make progress.

13. No one ever made progress by 'riding the fence'.. Even if i'm wrong, prove me wrong (NPA or convention) – and we will make progress. … i believe history will show: Asking the right questions At the right time By the right people..and progress becomes inevitable. Inevitable.