Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Design Review Group members: Ed Barnard Lizzie Hager

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Design Review Group members: Ed Barnard Lizzie Hager"— Presentation transcript:

1 Design Review 3-11-04 Group members: Ed Barnard Lizzie Hager
Jenny Lichter Kevin McComber

2 Overview Goal and Processing Method Ceramic Preform
Pressure Vessel Calculations Prototype Mold Design Expected and Threshold Pressures Infiltration ASME Standards for Hammers Methods of Characterization Risks

3 Goal The goal of our project is to manufacture a light-weight, high fracture toughness hammer using metal matrix composites. Halstead

4 Centrifugal Casting Process

5 Ceramic Preform Compression packing Sintering 3D printing Binder
May not produce uniform preform Can be improved through agitation Sintering May form connected ceramic matrix which could require post processing 3D printing May be time intensive Binder Must be able to be burnt out Initially we’ve been doing compression packing Purple box shows what we’ll likely use for our final prototype

6 Numerical Simulations
Monte Carlo Simulations Were considered to model packing density of ceramic powders Assume spherical particles Our particles are not spherical

7 Pressure Vessel Calculations
Pmax = 2200 psi = 150 atm S. F. : safety factor = 2 ri : inner radius = 1.00 inch Material σUTS (ksi) radiusouter < σUTS > (σUTS)min Brass 30-90 1.08 1.16 Stainless steel 60-150 1.04 Aluminum 45-80 1.07 1.10 Graphite 7-10 1.77 2.09 Wannasin

8 Pressure Vessel Calc. Ct’d
Current design: Aluminum 6061 inner radius of 0.75 inches outer radius of 1.00 inches Material σUTS (ksi) radiusouter < σUTS > (σUTS)min Aluminum 45-80 0.80 0.82 Brass has a low melting temperature and is too soft, and is heavier S. S. is too hard and too heavy Graphite would be too large

9 Prototype Mold Two-piece mold Conical shape to aid in the release
Swagelok connector to runner 2.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 .5 .75 1.75 1.0 5.5

10 Release from mold Boron Nitride Spray Coating Graphite powder
Breakaway ceramic TiC – small particle size Need a binder Breakaway ceramic must not be infiltrated so small particles are needed

11 Expected Pressures I1 ω12 = I2 ω22 P = ( ½ ) * (ρω2) * (z22 – z12)
Moment of inertia calculations Assumption of constant angular energy I1 ω12 = I2 ω22 ω1 = 2200 rpm, ω2 = 1250 rpm Pressure calculations: P = ( ½ ) * (ρω2) * (z22 – z12) Currently: 2200 psi or 150 atm New design: 710 psi or 50 atm Wannasin

12 Threshold Pressures Particulate Size (microns) Threshold Pressure
(atm) SiC 2 - 22 Al2O3 5 - 20 8 - 11 B4C 9 3 - 4 TiC 30 5 - 6 Based on aluminum infiltration Generally threshold pressure decreases with increasing particle size

13 Infiltration Larger particles necessary
Previously used particles a few microns in size Future Particles (already purchased) Boron Carbide 100 grit ( microns) Silicon Carbide 120 grit ( microns) Silicon Carbide 36 grit ( microns)

14 Safety Requirements (ASME): Design Parameters
Chamfer striking face 45 degrees with length equal to 1/10 of bell (to prevent chipping) Striking face must be flat or convex No unnecessary sharp edges, points or surface roughness Bell Striking Face Chamfer Halstead

15 Safety Requirements (ASME): Mechanical Properties
Hardness Test Striking face hardness: HRC Hardness must be maintained at least .75 in. into bell Striking Test Average person ( lbs) must strike steel (of hardness HRB) 20 times without causing damage

16 Safety Requirements (ASME): Mechanical Properties Cont.
Assembled Parts Tests (calculated for hammerhead of grams) Static Test 556 Newtons or 125 lbs. Tensile Test (for non-wedged assemblies) 3340 Newtons or 750 lbs.

17 Methods of Characterization
SEM Estimate ceramic volume fraction Possible defects – microvoid formation Incomplete infiltration Rockwell Hardness Impact tests Tensile and compression tests Plastic deformation

18 Risks Mold leaks Particle size leads to incomplete infiltration
Reduce mold weight Increase particle size Different preform production method Mold leaks O-ring system Use outer tube to hold molds

19 Risks, Ct’d Part cannot be removed Low hardness Air pockets
Use stronger mold release spray Change angle of mold Low hardness Choose different ceramic particles with better wettability with respect to metal Use multiple types of ceramic particles Air pockets Design an evacuation system Multiple types because particles may fit in each other’s interstitial sites

20 Projected Work Schedule

21 Works Cited Halstead, Gary. “Pictures from Dictionaire Paisonné du Mobilier Français.” Accessed 24 February Medieval and Renaissance Woodworking < >. Wannasin, Jessada. PhD Thesis. March 2004.


Download ppt "Design Review Group members: Ed Barnard Lizzie Hager"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google