1. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits1 Origins of Broadcast Regulation

2. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits2

3. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits3

4. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits4

5. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits5

6. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits6

7. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits7 New York Times, February 8, 1883

8. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits8

9. internet Broadcast radio and TV Books and newspapers source destination Less regulation More regulation April 14, 2011Harvard Bits9

10. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits10

11. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits11

12. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits12 G8 Summit, July 17, 2006

13. April 14, 201113Harvard Bits

14. April 15, 1912 April 14, 2011Harvard Bits14

15. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits15

16. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits16

17. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits17

18. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits18

19. Alignment of – Military interests – Commercial interests Huge public catalyzing event Result is … April 14, 2011Harvard Bits19 Congress acts

20. When the world weeps together over a common loss.. why should not the nations clear the sea of its conflicting idioms and wisely regulate this new servant of humanity [radio]? Speech on US Senate floor, May 28, 1912 William Alden Smith April 14, 2011Harvard Bits20

21. Radio Act of 1912 no one could broadcast without a license from the Secretary of Commerce Licenses “granted by the Secretary of Commerce and Labor upon application therefor” permissible frequencies were assigned by the Secretary of Commerce Military – got excellent frequencies, especially the navy Commercial shipping and other commercial use Amateurs – got banned altogether from “useful” frequencies – relegated to what were called the "short wavelengths“ (above 1000KHz) which at that time considered technologically unusable April 14, 2011Harvard Bits21

22. Commercial (wireless telegraphy) Amateur (unusable) Military Herbert Hoover April 14, 2011Harvard Bits22

23. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits23

24. This section [requiring licensing] does not give the head of that department [Commerce] discretionary power over the issue of licenses.. The license system proposed is substantially the same as that in use for the documenting upward of 25,000 merchant vessels. -- Report of House committee that recommended passage of the Radio Act of 1912 April 14, 2011Harvard Bits24

25. Commercial (wireless telegraphy) Militar y Herbert Hoover April 14, 2011Harvard Bits25

26. Broadcasting uses a “a great national asset,” i.e. the spectrum, So it is “of primary public interest to say who is to do the broadcasting, under what circumstances, and with what type of material.” Herbert Hoover, Speech to the First National Radio Conference, February 27, 1922 Herbert Hoover 1874-1964 April 14, 2011Harvard Bits26

27. Voluntary Cooperation 10kHz bands from 550 to 1350 Most incumbents cooperate Newcomers get jawboned Time-sharing, etc. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits27

28. US v. Zenith 1925: Zenith is given a Chicago license for 930kHz only on Thursday nights 10pm- midnight, when a Denver station was not broadcasting Jumps to 910 Hoover fines Zenith sues April 14, 2011Harvard Bits28

29. United States v. Zenith Radio Corp. et al. 12 F.2d 614; 1926 The Secretary of Commerce is required to issue the license subject to the regulations in the [Radio Act of 1912]. The Congress has withheld from him the power to prescribe additional regulations. and quoting the Supreme Court: “When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are supposed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power.” April 14, 2011Harvard Bits29

30. Radio Act of 1927 There would be no private ownership in the spectrum – So from 1927 on, the spectrum was public property spectrum licensed by Federal Radio Commission: FRC standard for licensing was public interest standard Successor was the Communications Act of 1934. Combined regulation for wired and wireless. FRC became the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) April 14, 2011Harvard Bits30

31. Radio Act of 1927 SEC. 29. Nothing in this Act shall be understood or construed to give the licensing authority the power of censorship over the radio communications or signals transmitted by any radio station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the licensing authority which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of radio communications. No person within the jurisdiction of the United States shall utter any obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio communications. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits31

32. John Romulus Brinkley (1885-1941) The Goat Gland Surgeon Radio Station KFKB (Kansas First, Kansas Best) April 14, 2011Harvard Bits32

33. KFKB Broadcasting Ass’n, Inc., v. Federal Radio Commission 60 App. D.C. 79; 47 F.2d 670;1931 It is apparent, we think, that the [broadcasting] business is impressed with a public interest and that, because the number of available broadcasting frequencies is limited, the commission is necessarily called upon to consider the character and quality of the service to be rendered. Obviously, there is no room in the broadcast band for every business or school of thought. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits33

34. National Broadcasting Co. v. U. S., 319 U.S. 190 (1943) … the radio spectrum simply is not large enough to accommodate everybody. There is a fixed natural limitation upon the number of stations that can operate without interfering with one another. Unlike other modes of expression, radio inherently is not available to all. That is its unique characteristic, and that is why, unlike other modes of expression, it is subject to governmental regulation. … - Justice Felix Frankfurter April 14, 2011Harvard Bits34

35. internet Broadcast radio and TV Books and newspapers source destination Less regulation More regulation April 14, 2011Harvard Bits35 bits

36. National Broadcasting Co. v. U. S., 319 U.S. 190 (1943) … the radio spectrum simply is not large enough to accommodate everybody. There is a fixed natural limitation upon the number of stations that can operate without interfering with one another. - Justice Felix Frankfurter April 14, 2011Harvard Bits36

37. Fox v. FCC, Justice Thomas’s Concurrence Second, even if this Court’s disfavored treatment of broadcasters under the First Amendment could have been justified at the time of Red Lion and Pacifica, dramatic technological advances have eviscerated the factual assumptions underlying those decisions. Broadcast spectrum is significantly less scarce than it was 40 years ago. April 14, 2011Harvard Bits37

38. END April 14, 2011Harvard Bits38