Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Thermal Modeling Syracuse University HEP Group Brian Maynard Steven Blusk.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Thermal Modeling Syracuse University HEP Group Brian Maynard Steven Blusk."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Thermal Modeling Syracuse University HEP Group Brian Maynard Steven Blusk

2 2 Material Constants Material Thermal Conductivity Thermal Conductivity (W/m*K) (W/m*K) Substrate (Diamond) (TPG) (TPG)2000 x,z: 2000 y: 10 Glue1 HDI (Kapton).18-.37 RO Chip (Silicon) 150 Silicon Detector 150 *INSERT INFO ON HDI

3 3 Assumptions Cross-sectional modeling of detector Applied 0.5W/cm 2 heat generation on read out chips by taking into account the 3D geometry Also applied heat generation function on the silicon sensors (not annealed, 900V, I/area = 135 uA/cm 2 at 1x10 6 n eq /cm 2 ) Held end of substrate at T=-25 C 2

4 4 Sensor35mm RO Chip35mm HDI39mm Glue39mm Substrate40mm Aspect Ratio 1:10.5.1.2.15 Thickness (mm)

5 5 Diamond or TPG?

6 6 Model Setup Applied heat generation on A4 Held A12 at -25C Initial Condition Temp: -25C

7 7 Aspect Ratio 1:10 Diamond Thickness 0.5mm

8 8 TPG Thickness 0.5mm

9 9 TPG Thickness 1 mm

10 10 TPG Thickness 5 mm

11 11 TPG Thickness 10mm

12 12 Diamond Thickness 10mm

13 13 Due to the substrate being thin (Y direction), TPG and Diamond show comparable results.

14 14 HDI Studies

15 15

16 16 Substrate Thickness *http://www2.dupont.com/Kapton/en_US/products/MT/index.html

17 17 Future Closing in on geometry and materials to use Closing in on geometry and materials to use Comparison of annealed v. non annealed silicon Comparison of annealed v. non annealed silicon 3D model 3D model


Download ppt "1 Thermal Modeling Syracuse University HEP Group Brian Maynard Steven Blusk."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google