1. Open Access to Scientific Documentation Institutional electronic repositories : a mandate for all researchers Bernard RENTIER Rector, ULg Chairman, Rectors' Conference, Belgium London, December 5th, 2007

2. Our permanent aims : 1.Disseminate scientific research results as widely, democratically and openly as possible 2.Get full access to all relevant literature, without limitation

3. One serious problem: dissemination has never been maximally effective No university or research institution library has ever been able to afford all the journals and books its faculty and students need Access limitation is exacerbated by some major publishers' "profit above all" policies

4. Price evolution of periodicals Taking prices of 1993 as a reference (100 %)

5. 1. Make optimal use of electronic publication Scientific communication ought to be quick Complete the traditional written text and still images by colours, animations and films. Archive and exchange electronically

6. 2. Make optimal use of the Web Make use of the new paradigm of scientific publication: reading is free Enjoy a universal lectorship Make the best possible use of the Web technology without lowering the quality control standards (peer review) Face the resistance to change in professional specialties (as for all technological revolutions)

7. Universities : a double goal 1.Universities want to ensure that the research they support is given the greatest possible impact Handle scientific communication (publication and/or self- archiving) in an alternative way, more widely, more democratically, more rapidly and more efficiently 2.They want to own a complete repertoire of the scientific production they support Maintain a permanent institutional repository

8. Paths to Open Access The Golden Path: all scientific literature is in full OA … a dream… but lots of difficulties, much resistance from publishers and researchers The Green Path: all scientific literature is : –accessible on institutional repositories, –referenced on search engines –available as electronic reprints on request

9. "Green" Open Access What needs to be done ? To convey a strong signal to university members to generate a large movement To reach a consensus among universities, research funding organisations and politicians

10. "Green" Open Access What needs to be done ? To keep reminding scientists about the main OA publishing channels To support initiatives to create new OA journals To support initiatives to bring existing journals to OA To promote institutional or thematic OA repositories and decide on a mandatory depot policy

11. "Green" Open Access Additional ethical reasons for OA To aid the access to Science in developing countries (where some universities have no journal subscriptions at all) Most research is paid for by taxpayers, who have a right to access the results of the work they have funded ( especially professionals, journalists, politicians, civil servants, hobbyists, activists) Even those who do not read scientific literature may wish that their taxpayer’s money leads to research results that are readily available to specialists

12. We need a full repository If we want to be able to collect a complete research record to measure that collection to apply assessment tools

13. Repositories must be mandatory Voluntary deposits fail to reach significant levels –Compliance is difficult to obtain –Even compliant researchers get quickly tired –Or simply forget Mandates must be presented in a positive way –Internal communication is essential –Collective benefits must be stressed But a determinant incentive must be found

14. Repositories must be mandatory Institutional repositories must be declared the only source of publication lists within the university for all internal purposes. –In Belgium: already the case for grants and positions with the National Research Fund –Perfect compatibility is needed with institutional repositories –The EC should be persuaded to align on this process

15. Open Access For all these reasons, we want to follow up on the movement created by the Berlin Declaration and the European Petition and launch an action plan to keep the pressure high : EurOpenScholar

16. EurOpenScholar The Liège Declaration AIMS : 1.open researchers' eyes –to the new ways of spreading knowledge –to the new ways of assessing research progress and performance in the OA era This will contribute to the advancement of research in Europe and to the promotion of European research and European researchers. 2.sensitise research managers, funding agencies, national and local research policy-makers, the R&D industry, the media and the general public to OA and its advantages 3.facilitate synergies and technology transfer 4.provide an effective channel for the communication of real science to the public, either directly or through the media.

17. EOS will : inform European university communities and research centers about opportunities available to researchers today –for providing OA, –to establish an institutional repository (in Liege, "La Digithèque"), allowing publications to be deposited and, wherever possible, made openly accessible to all. be a showcase and a tool for the promotion of OA in Europe be a consortium of European universities resolved to move forward on OA and to try to convince the largest possible number of researchers, their institutions and their European Funding Agencies to engage now in what will undoubtedly be the mode of communication of tomorrow, facilitate and accelerate as much as possible the transition to the OA era. EurOpenScholar The Liège Declaration

18. The EOS website, hosted by the ULg, will provide: a practical resource with helpful documents for universities and research centres on how to develop an OA policy, news on developments with EOS (+ news by e-mail), news at the European level, on both political and research developments, feedback from researchers on their expectations on the path to OA, feedback from researchers on whether they intend to take action in their institution concerning OA, EurOpenScholar The Liège Declaration

19. The EOS website, hosted by the ULg, will provide: an information-gathering service concerning OA institutional repositories and OA journals, tools to measure many aspects of research outputs IF they are collected in an institutional repository and IF they are openly available for analysis a discussion forum on OA and the methods emerging in the field of scientometrics (research performance and impact measurement, ranking and analysis) EurOpenScholar The Liège Declaration

20. Thank you ! brentier@ulg.ac.be