Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

An example story… Questions: –What is the role of selection in diversification? –Can spatial heterogeneity promote the emergence of multiple, coexisting.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "An example story… Questions: –What is the role of selection in diversification? –Can spatial heterogeneity promote the emergence of multiple, coexisting."— Presentation transcript:

1 An example story… Questions: –What is the role of selection in diversification? –Can spatial heterogeneity promote the emergence of multiple, coexisting ecotypes? (Nature 394:69-72)

2 Experimental design Microbe: Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 Inoculated ancestral strain into replicate flasks that were either shaken (homogeneous) or static (heterogeneous) Flasks destructively sampled by mixing and plating dilutions onto solid medium

3 Diversity observed in still medium after 7 days Repeatedly saw multiple colony types: –‘Smooth’ (SM) –‘Wrinkly-spreader’ (WS) –‘Fuzzy-spreader’ (FS) Alone, each occupies a different niche ‘preference’

4 Diversity & cell counts over time in each environment Diversity only arises in still environment Complex dynamics seen repeatedly in still medium Strong diversifying selection StillShaken

5 Maintenance of high diversity requires continued heterogeneity Diversity declined, but did not completely disappear shaken still shaken still

6 Fitness of each is ‘frequency- dependent’ Rate of invasion when rare (10 -2 ) –Used pantothenate auxotroph (  panB) –Competition assay All but one pair have a fitness advantage when rare Tradeoffs underlie coexistence – competition caused radiation

7 Caveat… Biggest issue: What is the true relationship between colony phenotypes and genetic (or other phenotypic) diversity? Could there be at least some ‘cryptic’ diversity within shaken flasks?

8 And a world was created in 7 days… Things to be thinking about looking forward –How much is fitness context dependent? –How rapid can adaptation occur? –Role of population size & mutation rate? –How repeatable is evolution? –Are there tradeoffs in adapting to each niche? If so, is this specialization irreversible? –Genetic basis? –Quantitative predictions based on physiological models? –Phenotypic diversity/epigenetics? –Are ecotypes from adaptive radiations stable? Equal to species? –Co-evolve specificity? –Are the WS cooperating? Are there cheaters?

9 Evolution before Darwin Aristotle: Scala Naturae –“Great chain of being” –Ordered gradation from inanimate - barely animate - plants/invertebrates - higher forms Linnaeus: Systema Naturae (1735) –“Undertaken in hope of discovering the pattern of God’s creation” (Futuyma, p.17) Species are constant though time, and no extinction (imperfection)

10 Evolution before Darwin Lamarck: Philosophie Zoologique (1809) –Species change through time (no extinction) –Inheritance of acquired characteristics But also drew evolution as a tree… –Extant organisms as ancestors?

11 Darwin & Wallace Darwin spent 5 years on HMS Beagle (1831- 1836) On September 28 th, 1838 (29 years old), made connection between Malthus and organisms In June 1858 received manuscript from Wallace “On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely form the Original Type” Rushed to present his work at the same time, then wrote a 490 page abstract… (1859)

12 Darwin & natural selection Two major tenets: –“[A]ll species, living and extinct have descended without interruption from one (or a few) original forms of life” (Futuyma, p.21) –“[I]f variations useful to any organic being ever occur, assuredly individuals thus characterised will have the best chance of being preserved in the struggle for life; and from the strong principle of inheritance, these will tend to produce offspring similarly characterised. This principle of preservation, or the survival of the fittest, I have called natural selection.” (Darwin, 1859)

13 After Darwin Big problem: no mechanism for generation of heritable variation Solution: Mendel’s peas (1863, but not discovered until 1900) In the 30s and 40s, the genetics was fully brought into the fold in the “Modern Synthesis” –Fisher, Haldane, Wright, Mayr, Huxley, Stebbins, Simpson, Dobzhansky…

14 Futuyma outlines 20 main points: 1.Phenotype due to genotype and environment 2.Environmental effects not inherited* 3.Heredity due to discrete genes 4.Genes mutate to new alleles 5.Environment does not bias mutations 6.Evolution is a population process (change in genotype or allele frequencies) 7.Changes in frequencies can be due to drift or selection 8.Small selective differences matter 9.Selection can alter populations beyond original variation due to recombination between alleles 10.Natural populations are genetically variable Modern synthesis

15 Futuyma outlines 20 main points: 11.Geographic differences can have a genetic basis 12.Phenotypic differences often due to sum of many small genetic changes 13.Natural selection continues to act today 14.Geographic differences are often adaptive 15.Phenotypic differentiation can occur within a species; species represent distinct gene pools 16.Degree of differentiation is a continuum 17.Speciation is often linked with geographic isolation* 18.Differences between higher taxa sum of small differences 19.Gaps in fossil record due to incompleteness, but also show intermediate forms 20.Paleontology is concordant with evolutionary theory


Download ppt "An example story… Questions: –What is the role of selection in diversification? –Can spatial heterogeneity promote the emergence of multiple, coexisting."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google