1. ENAEE: A network to ensure quality and accredit engineering programmes of European Universities; the EUR-ACE® label the EUR-ACE® system [May 2007] Giuliano Augusti Coordinator, EUR-ACE-IMPLEMENTATION project President, ENAEE

2. in GREAT BRITAIN and IRELAND, accreditation standards and procedures are the responsibility of professional Institutions, and Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) are only involved through the assessment of education programmes, although sometimes they have to adapt the curricula in order that their programmes be accredited; in FRANCE, since as early as 1934, “habilitation” is granted to engineering programmes and HEIs by the “Commission des Titres d‘ Ingénieur” (CTI), in which the academic world, the profession and the employers are represented on a parity basis; 2 Educational Systems in Europe are very different from each other, because of historical reasons. Also, significance and procedures for accreditation of engineering education vary greatly from one European country to the other. Typical examples (1-2):

3. Educational Systems in Europe are very different from each other, because of historical reasons. Also, significance and procedures for accreditation of engineering education vary greatly from one European country to the other. Typical examples (3-4): in ITALY, like in some other “continental” countries, the conformity of an academic programme to rules set by the Ministry of Education (or another national authority) is seen as making an HE programme automatically accredited (fortunately, this viewpoint is changing and QA is being introduced…); in GERMANY, the “new” Bachelor and Master programmes must be accredited (for “old” programmes accreditation is voluntary): the governmental “German Accreditation Council” authorizes independent Agencies to accredit programmes (meta- accreditation). ASIIN (formerly, ASII) is one of these Agencies, specialized in engineering, informatics and science programmes. 3

4. This was the basic motivation behind the EUR-ACE project (EURopean ACcredited Engineer) and ENAEE European Network for Accreditation of EE 4 Europe lacks an accreditation system of engineering education accepted on the continental scale. This fact, notwithstanding the prestige of many National systems and of some Academic titles, in a global job market puts the European engineer in a objectively weak position, when confronted with the several international recognition agreements, existing or on the making.

5. Accreditation of an Engineering Education Programme (according to EUR-ACE and ENAEE) Result of a process to ensure suitability of programme as entry route to the xxxxx profession Periodic assessment against accepted standards Peer review of written and oral information by trained and independent panels including academics and professionals Accreditation of programme, not of Department or University Accreditation of education, not of whole formation 5 Quality of accredited degrees guaranteed at all “levels”

6. The EUR-ACE project (2004/2006) proposed an European accreditation system that should ensure consistency between existing national “engineering” accreditation systems; add an European “quality label” to accreditation; introduce “accreditation” in other countries; and thus improve quality of education facilitate trans-national recognition facilitate (physical and virtual) mobility 6 EUR-ACE has been supported by the European Commission (DG EaC) within SOCRATES and TEMPUS programmes

7. Main EUR-ACE output document: A1) EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes (including a Template for Publishing Results) These “Framework Standards” specify the Programme Outcomes that must be satisfied. They: Are valid for all branches of engineering and all profiles Distinguish between First and Second Cycle programmes, as defined in the European Qualification Framework Are applicable also to “integrated programmes”, i.e. programmes that are designed to lead directly to a Second Cycle degree Describe what is to be achieved but not how Can accommodate national differences of educational and accreditation practice 7

8. Six categories of Programme Outcomes Knowledge and Understanding Engineering Analysis Engineering Design Investigations Engineering Practice Transferable (personal) Skills 8 For each category, the EUR-ACE Framework Standards list the Programme Outcomes of First Cycle and Second Cycle

9. EUR-ACE Standards EUR-ACE Standards Knowledge and Understanding First cycle Knowledge and understanding of the scientific and mathematical principles underlying their branch of engineering. A systematic understanding of the key aspects and concepts of their branch of engineering. Coherent knowledge of their branch of engineering including some at the forefront of the branch. Awareness of the wider multidisciplinary context of engineering. Second cycle An in-depth knowledge and understanding of the principles of their branch of engineering; A critical awareness of the forefront of their branch. 9

10. EUR-ACE Standards Engineering Analysis First cycle The ability to apply their knowledge and understanding to to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems using established methods. to analyse engineering products, processes and methods. The ability to select and apply relevant analytic and modelling methods. Second cycle The ability to solve problems that are unfamiliar, incompletely defined, and have competing specifications. to formulate and solve problems in new and emerging areas of their specialization. to use their knowledge and understanding to conceptualise engineering models, systems and processes. to apply innovative methods in problem solving. 10

11. EUR-ACE Standards Engineering Design First cycle The ability to apply their engineering knowledge and understanding to develop and realize designs to meet defined and specified requirements. Understanding of design methodologies, and ability to use them. Second cycle An ability to use their engineering knowledge and understanding to design solutions to unfamiliar problems, possibly involving other disciplines. An ability to use creativity to develop new and original ideas and methods. An ability to use their engineering judgment to work with complexity, technical uncertainty and incomplete information. 11

12. EUR-ACE Standards Investigations …be able to use appropriate methods to pursue research or other detailed investigations of technical issues consiste with their level of knowledge and understanding… …be able to use appropriate methods to pursue research or other detailed investigations of technical issues consistent with their level of knowledge and understanding… First cycle The ability to conduct searches of literature, and to use data bases and other sources of information. The ability to design and conduct appropriate experiments, interpret the data and draw conclusions. Workshop and laboratory skills. Second cycle The ability to identify, locate and obtain required data. The ability to design and conduct analytic, modelling and experimental investigations. The ability to critically evaluate data and draw conclusions. The ability to investigate the application of new and emerging technologies in their branch of engineering. 12

13. EUR-ACE Standards Engineering Practice First cycle The ability to select and use appropriate equipment, tools and methods. The ability to combine theory and practice to solve engineering problems. An understanding of applicable techniques and methods, and of their limitations. An awareness of the non-technical (ethical, environmental, commercial and industrial) implications of engineering practice. Second cycle The ability to integrate knowledge from different branches, and handle complexity. A comprehensive understanding of applicable techniques and methods, and of their limitations. A knowledge of the non-technical implications of engineering practice. 13

14. EUR-ACE Standards Transferable (Personal) Skills First cycle Function effectively as an individual and as a member of a team. Use diverse methods to communicate effectively with the engineering community and with society at large. Demonstrate awareness of the health, safety and legal issues and responsibilities of engineering practice, the impact of engineering solutions in a societal and environmental context, and commit to professional ethics, responsibilities and norms of engineering practice. Demonstrate an awareness of project management and business practices, such as risk and change management, and understand their limitations. Recognize the need for, and have the ability to engage in independent, life- long learning. Second cycle Fulfill all the requirements of a First Cycle graduate at the more demanding level of Second Cycle. Function effectively as leader of a team that may be composed of different disciplines and levels. Work and communicate effectively in national and international contexts. 14

15. The EUR-ACE project elaborated also another document A2) Organization and Management of the EUR-ACE Accreditation System: a proposal which we are now trying to implement. 15 First step for implementation: the European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education ENAEE was established in 2006 as an international no-profit Association.

16. ENAEE: how was it born ? 1998-2000: Three EWAEPs: European Workshops on Accreditation of Engineering Programmes, promoted by wg2 of Thematic Network H3E Paris, 9 September 2000: the representatives of six Associations sign an Agreement “intended to build confidence in systems of accreditation of engineering degree programmes within Europe […], […] to assist national agencies and other bodies in planning and developing such systems […] to facilitate systematic exchange of know-how in accreditation and permanent monitoring of the educational requirements in engineering formation” 16 SOME HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

17. 17 The agreement established also the European Standing Observatory for the Engineering Profession and Education ESOEPE Founding members UK: EC FR: CTI DE: ASII (now ASIIN) PT: OE (Ordem...) IT: CoPI EU: E4 (now TREE) Later members EU: FEANI EU: SEFI RO: CNEAA RO: UAICR RU: RAEE IE: IEI

18. April 2004: ESOEPE is instrumental in preparing and submitting the EUR-ACE project application 18 October 2005: In view of EUR-ACE, it is decided to transform ESOEPE from an “observatory” into a not-for-profit registered Association: The EUR-ACE accreditation system is being set up within ENAEE, monitored by an ad-hoc Working Group (EUR-ACE Label Committee)

19. 19 Official birth date: 8 February 2006 Membership defined by the Statutes: Full Members: now 14 (founding) + 2 – 1 (withdrawn) a) Accreditation organizations for engineering programmes within the European Higher Education Area; b) other organizations having the development of engineering education accreditation procedures among their main objectives and organizations whose mission is to foster the interests of the profession of engineers. Associate Members: none at present a) Educational and training institutions and their associations. b) Organisations representing engineering students

20. 20 Official birth date: 8 February 2006 Founding members: FEANI (acting Secretariat)RAEE (RU) SEFI CoPI (IT) UNIFI/TREEIEI-EngineersIreland EUROCADRESOE (Ordem...) (PT) EC (UK) UAICR (RO) CTI (FR) IDA (DK) ASIIN (DE) FOTEP (CH)

21. 21 First General Assembly: 30 March 2006 Second “ “ : 17 November 2006 New members admitted at the Second General Assembly (17 November 2006) CLAIU MÜDEK

22. 22 General Assembly One voting delegate of each Full Member One non-voting delegate of each Associate Member The GA elects: The Administrative Council (5 to 7 members: 3 years) The President and the Treasurer (among AC members)

23. 23 Official birth date: 8 February 2006 First General Assembly: 30 March 2006 Administrative Council (2006/09) G.Augusti (IT, President), A.Chuchalin (RU), C.Forslund (SE), A.Pugh (UK), J.M.Siwak (FR), I.Wasser (DE), P.Wauters (BE, Treasurer)

24. 24 At present, ENAEE is an essential partner of two projects: Under the “Socrates” programme: EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION (in the EU) Under the “Tempus-Tacis” programme: PRO-EAST: PROmotion and implementation of the EUR-ACE Standards (in Russia) and is involved in a project under “Tempus-Meda” programme: LEPAC: Creation of a Lebanese Engineering Programs Accreditation Commission

25. EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION A project aimed at implementing the EUR-ACE system in the EU (1 September 2006 / 31 July 2008) 25 Contracting Institution: UNIFI (C.Borri, Legal Representative) Partner Institutions: ENAEE (G.Augusti, Coord.) IEI: Engineers Ireland FEANI CoPI (IT) SEFICRUI (IT) EUROCADRESNVAO (NL) EUAOE (PT) IDA (DK)EC (UK) ASIIN(DE)UAICR (RO) AUA (USAEE)MUDEK (TR) C.T.I. (FR)RAEE (RU) ; OPET/BBT (CH)

26. In parallel to EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION, a project under the TEMPUS-TACIS programme: PROmotion and implementation of the EUR-ACE Standards [ PRO-EAST ] (15 October 2006-14 October 2007) Participating Institutions: UNIFI, RAEE, FEANI, CoPI, SEFI, TPU Project coordinator: Oleg Boev Deputy coordinator for EU: Giuliano Augusti External experts: Iring Wasser, Ian Freeston. Main aims: dissemination of the EUR-ACE results Award of the first EUR-ACE labels in Russia 26

27. Contracting Inst.: FEANI (Philippe Wauters: Legal Repr.) Project coordinator: Haissam Ziade Grant Coordinator: Giuliano Augusti Participating Inst. from EU: ASIIN, CTI, UNIFI, TUAachen Participating Institutions from Lebanon: - Ministry of Education, Directorate for HE - Orders of Architects and Engineers, Beirut & Tripoli - 4 Lebanese Universities ENAEE and the three projects work in close collaboration 27 Another relevant project within the TEMPUS-MEDA programme started in January 2007: LEPAC: Creation of a Lebanese Engineering Programs Accreditation Commission

28. 28 From the ENAEE General Policy Statement (General Assembly, 17 Nov. 2006) [1] ENAEE will actively contribute to running the EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION and PRO-EAST projects, in full coherence with the objectives indicated in the Final Documents of the EUR-ACE project, to which ENAEE is fully committed. Therefore, in accord with the quoted EUR-ACE objectives, ENAEE will try and establish gradually a bottom-up European system for accreditation of engineering education, as wide as possible and consistent with the general indication of the Bologna process, and in particular with the ENQA “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the EHEA” and the “Framework for Qualifications in the EHEA”.

29. 29 From the ENAEE General Policy Statement (General Assembly, 17 Nov. 2006) [2] In the EUR-ACE system, national or regional agencies will accredit the educational programmes, and ENAEE, on the advice of an appropriate Committee, will authorize them to add the EUR-ACE quality label to the accreditation. The EUR-ACE label will be distinguished into “EUR-ACE Bachelor” (“European Accredited Engineering Bachelor”) and “EUR-ACE Master” (“European Accredited Engineering Master”) respectively when the programme is accredited at the FC or SC level. ENAEE will monitor and respond to the development of all future degree programmes that may come within its scope.

30. Implementing the EUR-ACE system Once more, remember KEY POINTS: NOT an European Directive NOT an European Accreditation Board A bottom-up agreement towards a decentralized accreditation system in which: Accreditation is awarded by (present and future) National (or Regional) Agencies that satisfy the EUR-ACE Standards. The EUR-ACE label is “added” to the “national” accreditation, thus giving it an added value, and is recognized by all participating Agencies 30

31. Six Agencies fulfill already the EUR-ACE Standards: ASIIN (DE) EC (UK) IEI-EngineersIreland CTI (FR) OE (PT) RAEE (RU) These Agencies will be the initial “core” of the EUR-ACE system; their representatives sit in the EUR-ACE Label Committee Higher Educations Institutions in these six countries can apply to get the EUR-ACE Label in addition to the national accreditation. 31

32. a)In countries without any accreditation system: Create a new Engineering Accreditation Agency. In the meantime, programmes can be accredited by an Agency already operative in the system. b)In countries with established “general” accreditation agencies, these can be authorized to award the EUR-ACE label if they apply the EUR-ACE Standards when accrediting engineering programmes. 32 Two main ways to enlarge the EUR- ACE system beyond the initial core:

33. To implement the procedures, the EUR-ACE Label Committee has elaborated three documents. The final version has been confirmed by the ENAEE Administrative Council on 3 May 2007: Fundamental one: ENAEE Standards and Guidelines for Accreditation Agencies (SGA) that will be applied a) to confirm the authorization to the six Agencies of the initial “core”, b) to examine applications from other Agencies, members of ENAEE and not. 33 EUR-ACE system:

34. 34

35. 35 Implementing the EUR-ACE system:

36. 36 Implementing the EUR-ACE system: (an internal operative document)

37. Большое спасибо за внимание from Giuliano Augusti President of ENAEE Coordinator of EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION giuliano.augusti@uniroma1.it eur-ace@unifi.it Tel.(+39)06.4458.5155; mobile:(+39)320.4271831 www.enaee.eu

38. Many thanks for your attention from Giuliano Augusti President of ENAEE Coordinator of EUR-ACE IMPLEMENTATION giuliano.augusti@uniroma1.it eur-ace@unifi.it Tel.(+39)06.4458.5155; mobile:(+39)320.4271831 www.enaee.eu