Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Context of Congressional Elections Single member districts Roughly equal size (650,000 souls) First Tuesday in November in even # years Australian ballot.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Context of Congressional Elections Single member districts Roughly equal size (650,000 souls) First Tuesday in November in even # years Australian ballot."— Presentation transcript:

1 Context of Congressional Elections Single member districts Roughly equal size (650,000 souls) First Tuesday in November in even # years Australian ballot Must win 2 elections

2 Social & Political Contexts Amazing Variation – geographic size – Population – Economic base – Ethnicity – Age – Partisanship

3 Incumb Reelect Rates 1832- 1988

4 Incumbency 93% of House incumbents are reelected – 1994, 84% of House Democrats were reelected 77% of Senate incumbents are reelected #1 question to ask for congressional elections, Is there an incumbent? Defining feature of Congress

5 Web Assignment #7 Roll Call- Campaign News – What makes a good candidate? – What makes a close election?

6

7 House of Representatives 61 “competitive” races in 2000 – 193 GOP incumbents won, 4 lost – 199 Dem incumbents won, 2 lost – GOP wins 20 of 25 open seats – Dems with 4 of 10 open seats 17 changes of 435

8

9 Senate in 2000 12 toss up races out of 33 – GOP 13 of 18 incumbents win – Dems 10 of 11 incumbents win – GOP 0 of 1 on open seats – Dems 3 of 4 on open seats 7 changes

10 Sources of Incumbent advantage Institutions are designed by members who want to get reelected. Amazing array of resources – Free mail, trips to district, staff – Free facilities for TV and radio ads – Casework

11 # of Senate Staff, 1830 –1993

12

13

14 Is it the Money Average incumbent gets 64.3% of vote For every $100,00 spent, lose 1.17% of vote For every $100,00 spent by party, lose 2.73% of vote incumbent House winner spends $700,00 incumbent House loser spends 1,300,000

15 Why Incumbents Win Table 5.3, high name recognition Table 5.7, Voters Contact with Candidates Table 5.15 – Personal – Performance/experience – District service – Ideology/Policy

16 Challengers Strategy Table 5.3 name recognition Table 5.11, Campaign expenditures and name recognition Table 5.7, Voters Contact with Candidates – Where do voters learn about challengers Table 5.15, Things liked about challengers – What is #1?

17 The Incumbent’s Strategy Discourage serious electoral competition – Herb Kohl Use casework, trips home, mailings to create perception of invulnerability Ambitious career politicians and campaign funders are rational

18

19 Electoral Competition and Challenger Spending in 1994 Challenger’s party vote in last House election, spending by non-incumbent house candidate <40%, $105,000 40-45%, $322,000 45-49.9%, $433,000 Open seat $580,000

20 Expectations Game Better the electoral odds, better the challenger and more money Weak incumbents and open seats attract well funded quality challengers Strong incumbents attract weak, poorly funded candidates

21 Strategic Politician Hypothesis Best candidates, most money go to marginal incumbents, open seats 2 nd tier candidates, some money go Hopeless, poorly funded candidates run against strong incumbents

22 Who is a marginal incumbent Less than 60% of vote in previous election Scandal in last term Republican in a democratic leaning district First term representative

23 Campaigns ½ of all money is wasted, high uncertainty What issues are important Low turnout Random terror and running scared – Tom Foley, speaker of the house, 15 terms

24 Why do incumbents win? Better known (90% vs 40% Better liked (more familiar) Better funded

25 Why do challengers win? Make voters aware of incumbents’ shortcomings, their own virtues via mass media Are well funded Implications???

26 Reforming the System Term limits – Federal level – State level Increase competitiveness of elections – Campaign finance reform Key Issue, how to get more people to run for office!!!

27 The Two Congresses Representative/elective institution – reelection is never far from members’ minds. Lawmaking institution – First branch of government – Unique among representative institutions

28 Explaining the Behavior of Individual Members Edmund Burke should representative – act like a delegate and follow the wishes of those who have elected him or her? – Or as a Trustee who decides according to his or her own best judgment?

29 Changing Representational Roles Lawmakers District service Constituent assistance

30 3 types of behavior Advertising – Nobody’s senator but yours Credit claiming – Has to be credible – Pork barreling; casework Position taking – Inherently costly

31 reelection tips for legislators keep your perspective speak the right language first impressions are important


Download ppt "Context of Congressional Elections Single member districts Roughly equal size (650,000 souls) First Tuesday in November in even # years Australian ballot."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google