Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Experience from PV system performance (including comparison of on-roof and façade systems in Prague) Vitezslav Benda, Zdenek Machacek CTU Prague, Faculty.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Experience from PV system performance (including comparison of on-roof and façade systems in Prague) Vitezslav Benda, Zdenek Machacek CTU Prague, Faculty."— Presentation transcript:

1 Experience from PV system performance (including comparison of on-roof and façade systems in Prague) Vitezslav Benda, Zdenek Machacek CTU Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering

2 radiationtemperature datalogger In the year 2001, a 3kW p demonstration, on-grid connected photovoltaic system has been built at the Czech Technical University in Prague on the roof of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering.

3

4 Installed peak power: 3320 W p Total module area: 26 m 2 Number of modules: 30 (3 fields of 10) Latitude: 50.07 ° N Altitude: 205 m http://k313.feld.cvut.cz/solarsys/

5 Module typeP max (W p )Vpm (V)Vpm (V)Ipm (A)Ipm (A)V OC (V)I SC (A)  cell (%)  module (%) RADIX72-112111,517,46,4121,57,0414,912,8 RADIX72-108107,817,16,2921,56,9814,412,4 Parameters of PV modules at radiation power 1000W/m2, spectrum AM 1,5 and temperature 25°C PV fieldTilt angleModule typeP m (W p ) 145°RADIX72-1121120 2variableRADIX72-1121120 390°RADIX72-1081080 Parameters of individual PV fields

6 Parameters of Sunrise inverters Type of inverterSunrise MiniSunrise Micro Input voltage120 - 300 V Nominal input voltage170 V Maximum input voltage 350 V Output voltage230 V,+10/-15% Output frequency50 Hz,+/-0,2 Hz Output nominal current 4,4 A3,2 A Output nominal power1000 W750 W Harmonic distortion< 3%< 5% Maximum effectivity93%92% Dark consumption0 W

7 A comparison of estimated and measured energy production in period from January 2002 to December 2005

8 Energy produced by individual PV fields in period from January 2002 to December 2005

9

10 This gives the efficiency decrease of about 0.6% per 1K, which is higher than supposed decrease of cell efficiency (about 0.4% per 1K). It means that an increase of losses with increasing temperature in other parts of system cannot be neglected. Temperature dependence of energy conversion efficiency

11 August January

12 Temperature distribution over the PV field areas roof facade June, ambient temperature 32 °C Tilt angle: 45° Tilt angle: 90°

13 Temperature distribution over the PV field areas December, ambient temperature -6 °C roof

14 Shadowing effect PV field 1 PV field 2

15 Conclusions Facade PV system applications can produce about 66% of electrical energy produced by the roof (45° tilted) one Efficiency of PV systems is strongly influenced by temperature PV field constructions should allow an effective cooling of PV modules


Download ppt "Experience from PV system performance (including comparison of on-roof and façade systems in Prague) Vitezslav Benda, Zdenek Machacek CTU Prague, Faculty."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google