Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Feature Selection, Feature Extraction**

2
Need for reduction Classification of leukemia tumors from microarray gene expression data1 72 patients (data points) 7130 features (expression levels of different genes) Text mining, document classification features are words Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) features are molecular descriptors, there exist plenty of them 1 Xing, Jordan, Karp, Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Genomic Microarray Data, 2001

3
**QSAR biological activity Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR)**

an expression describing the beneficial or adverse effects of a drug on living matter Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) hypotheses that similar molecules have similar activities molecular descriptor mathematical procedure transforms chemical information encoded within a symbolic representation of a molecule into a useful number

4
**Molecular descriptor adjacency (connectivity) matrix**

total adj. index AV – sum all aij measure of the graph connectedness 2.183 Randic connectivity indices measure of the molecular branching The total adjacency index is a measure of the graph connectedness delta – vertex degree

5
QSAR Form a mathematical/statistical relationship (model) between structural (physiochemical) properties and activity. The mathematical expression can then be used to predict the biological response of other chemical structures. biological activity descriptor

6
**Selection vs. Extraction**

In feature selection we try to find the best subset of the input feature set. In feature extraction we create new features based on transformation or combination of the original feature set. Both selection and extraction lead to the dimensionality reduction. No clear cut evidence that one of them is superior to the other on all types of task. - Motivating idea: try to find a simple, “parsimonious” model Occam’s razor: simplest explanation that accounts for the data is best

7
Why to do it? We’re interested in features – we want to know which are relevant. If we fit a model, it should be interpretable. facilitate data visualization and data understanding reduce experimental costs (measurements) We’re interested in prediction – features are not interesting in themselves, we just want to build a good predictor. faster training defy the curse of dimensionality

8
**Feature selection (FS)**

9
**Classification of FS methods**

Filter Assess the relevance of features only by looking at the intrinsic properties of the data. Usually, calculate the feature relevance score and remove low-scoring features. Wrapper Bundle the search for best model with the FS. Generate and evaluate various subsets of features. The evaluation is obtained by training and testing a specific ML model. Embedded The search for an optimal subset is built into the classifier construction (e.g. decision trees).

10
**Filter methods Two steps (score-and-filter approach) Advantages:**

assess each feature individually for ist potential in discriminating among classes in the data features falling beyong threshold are eliminated Advantages: easily scale to high-dimensional data simple and fast independent of the classification algorithm Disadvantages: ignore the interaction with the classifier most techniques are univariate (each feature is considered separately)

11
**Scores in filter methods**

Distance measures Euclidean distance Dependence measures Pearson correlation coefficient χ2-test t-test AUC Information measures information gain mutual information complexity: O(d) - chi squared test:

12
Wrappers Search for the best feature subset in combination with a fixed classification method. The goodness of a feature subset is determined using cross-validation (k-fold, LOOCV) Advantages: interaction between feature subset and model selection take into account feature dependencies generally more accurate Disadvantages: higher risk of overfitting than filter methods very computationally intensive

13
Exhaustive search Evaluate all possible subsets using exhaustive search – this leads to the optimum subset. For a total of d variables, and subset of size p, the total number of possible subsets is complexity: O(2d) (exponential) Various strategies how to reduce the search space. They are still O(2d), but much faster (at least 1000-times) e.g. “branch and bound” e.g. d = 100, p = 10 → ≈2×1013

14
Stochastic Genetic algorithms Simulated Annealing

15
**Difficulty in Searching Global Optima**

starting point descend direction local minima global minima barrier to local search Local search techniques, such as steepest descend method, are very good in finding local optima. However, difficulties arise when the global optima is different from the local optima. Since all the immediate neighboring points around a local optima is worse than it in the performance value, local search can not proceed once trapped in a local optima point. We need some mechanism that can help us escape the trap of local optima. And the simulated annealing is one of such methods. Introduction to Simulated Annealing, Dr. Gildardo Sánchez ITESM Campus Guadalajara

16
**Consequences of the Occasional Ascents**

Help escaping the local optima. desired effect Might pass global optima after reaching it adverse effect However, like swords have two edges, there are two consequences of allowing occasional ascent steps. On one hand, it fulfills our desire to let the algorithm proceed beyond local optima. On the other hand, we might miss the global optima by allowing the search process to pass through it. To maintain the desired effect and reduce the adverse effect, we need a sophisticated scheme to control the acceptance of occasional ascents, which is the heart of simulated annealing. Introduction to Simulated Annealing, Dr. Gildardo Sánchez ITESM Campus Guadalajara

17
Simulated annealing Slowly cool down a heated solid, so that all particles arrange in the ground energy state. At each temperature wait until the solid reaches its thermal equilibrium. Probability of being in a state with energy E: The name of simulated annealing origins from the simulation of annealing process of heated solids. “In condensed matter physics, annealing denotes a physical process in which a solid in a heat bath is heated up by increasing the temperature of the heat bath to a maximum value at which all particles of the solid randomly arrange themselves in the liquid phase, followed by cooling through slowly lowering the temperature of the heat bath. In this way, all particles arrange themselves in the low energy ground state of a corresponding lattice.” (quoted from Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications) In solving combinatorial optimization problems, we make an analogy to the aforementioned process. The basic idea is that by allowing the search process to proceed in an unfavorable direction occasionally, we might be able to escape the trap of local optima and reach the global optima. E … energy T … temperature kB … Boltzmann constant Z(T) … normalization factor

18
**Cooling simulation At a fixed temperature T :**

Metropolis, 1953 Metropolis algorithm At a fixed temperature T : Perturb (randomly) the current state to a new state E is the difference in energy between current and new state If E < 0 (new state is lower), accept new state as current state If E 0 , accept new state with probability Eventually the systems evolves into thermal equilibrium at temperature T When equilibrium is reached, temperature T can be lowered and the process can be repeated

19
Simulated annealing Same algorithm can be used for combinatorial optimization problems: Energy E corresponds to the objective function C Temperature T is parameter controlled within the algorithm

20
**Algorithm initialize; REPEAT perturb ( config.i config.j, Cij);**

IF Cij < 0 THEN accept ELSE IF exp(-Cij/T) > random[0,1) THEN accept; IF accept THEN update(config.j); UNTIL equilibrium is approached sufficient closely; T := next_lower(T); UNTIL system is frozen or stop criterion is reached

21
Parameters Choose the start value of T so that in the beginning nearly all perturbations are accepted (exploration), but not too big to avoid long run times At each temperature, search is allowed to proceed for a certain number of steps, L(k). The function next_lower (T(k)) is generally a simple function to decrease T, e.g. a fixed part (80%) of current T. - k … loop index

22
At the end T is so small that only a very small number of the perturbations is accepted (exploitation). The choice of parameters {T(k), L(k)} is called the cooling schedule. If possible, always try to remember explicitly the best solution found so far; the algorithm itself can leave its best solution and not find it again.

24
**Deterministic Sequential Forward Selection (SFS)**

Sequential Backward Selection (SBS) “ Plus q take away r ” Selection Sequential Forward Floating Search (SFFS) Sequential Backward Floating Search (SBFS)

25
**Sequential Forward Selection**

SFS At the beginning select the best feature using a scalar criterion function. Add one feature at a time which along with already selected features maximizes the criterion function. A greedy algorithm, cannot retract (also called nesting effect). Complexity is O(d)

26
**Sequential Backward Selection**

SBS At the beginning select all d features. Delete one feature at a time and select the subset which maximize the criterion function. Also a greedy algorithm, cannot retract. Complexity is O(d).

27
**“Plus q take away r” Selection**

At first add q features by forward selection, then discard r features by backward selection Need to decide optimal q and r No subset nesting problems Like SFS and SBS

28
**Sequential Forward Floating Search**

SFFS It is a generalized “plus q take away r” algorithm The value of q and r are determined automatically Close to optimal solution Affordable computational cost Also in backward disguise

29
Embedded FS The feature selection process is done inside the ML algorithm. Decision trees In final tree, only a subset of features are used Regularization It effectively “shuts down” unnecessary features. Pruning in NN.

30
**Feature extraction (FE)**

31
**FS – indetify and select the “best” features with respect to the target task.**

Selected features retain their original physical interpretation. FE – create new features as a transformation (combination) of original features. Usually followed by FS. May provide better discriminatory ability than the best subset. Do not retain the original physical interpretation, may not have clear meaning.

32
**Principal Component Analysis (PCA)**

33
x2 x1

34
x2 Make data to have zero mean (i.e. move data into [0, 0] point). centering x1

36
x2 This is a line given by equation w0 + w1x1 + w2x2 This is another line w’0 + w’1x1 + w’2x2 x1

37
**The variability in data is highest along this line**

The variability in data is highest along this line. It is called 1st principal component. x2 And this is 2nd principal component. x1

38
x2 Principal components (PC’s) are linear combinations of original coordinates. The coefficients of linear combination (w0, w1, …) are called loadings. In the transformed coordinate system, individual data points have different coordinates, these are called scores. w0 + w1x1 + w2x2 w’0 + w’1x1 + w’2x2 x1

39
PCA - orthogonal linear transformation that changes the data into a new coordinate system such that the variance is put in order from the greatest to the least. Solve the problem = find new orthogonal coordinate system = find loadings PC’s (vectors) and their corresponding variances (scalars) are found by eigenvalue decompositions of the covariance matrix C = XXT of the xi variables. Eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is 1st PC. The 2nd eigenvector (the 2nd largest eigenvalue) is orthogonal to the 1st one. … Eigenvalue decomposition is computed using standard algorithms: eigen decomposition of covariance matrix (e.g. QR algorithm), SVD of mean centered data matrix.

40
Interpretation of PCA New variables (PCs) have a variance equal to their corresponding eigenvalue Var(Yi)= i for all I = 1…p Small i small variance data changes little in the direction of component Yi The relative variance explained by each PC is given by li / li

41
How many components? Enough PCs to have a cumulative variance explained by the PCs that is >50-70% Kaiser criterion: keep PCs with eigenvalues >1 Scree plot: represents the ability of PCs to explain de variation in data

Similar presentations

OK

Principal Component Analysis Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University.

Principal Component Analysis Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on wastage of time energy and money Ppt on holographic technology stocks Ppt on multiplication for class 2 Free ppt on crop production and management Ppt on extranuclear inheritance Ppt on formal education system Civil engineering ppt on environmental Download ppt on historical places in india Ppt on real numbers for class 9th result Ppt on underground metro rail in india