Presentation on theme: "Nuclear reactions determine element abundance… Is the earth homogeneous though? Is the solar system?? Is the universe???"— Presentation transcript:
Nuclear reactions determine element abundance… Is the earth homogeneous though? Is the solar system?? Is the universe???
Earth = anion balls with cations in the spaces… View of the earth as a system of anions packed together By size and abundance, Si and O are the most important If we consider anions as balls, then their arrangement is one of efficient packing, with smaller cations in the interstices Closest packed structures are ones in which this idea describes atomic arrangement – OK for metals, sulfides, halides, some oxides
Closest Packing Coordination number (C.N) - # of anions bonded to a cation larger cation, higher C.N. Anions are much larger than most cations anion arrangements in 3 dimensions = packing Hexagonal Closest Packed (HCP) - spheres lie atop each other– vertical sequence ABABAB Cubic closest packed (CCP) – spheres fill in gaps of layer below – vertical sequence ABCABC Exceptions to closest packing – Body centered cubic (BCC), polyhedra, and others…
Pauling’s Rules for ionic structures 1.Radius Ratio Principle – cation-anion distance can be calculated from their effective ionic radii cation coordination depends on relative radii between cations and surrounding anions Geometrical calculations reveal ideal R c /R a ratios for selected coordination numbers Larger cation/anion ratio yields higher C.N. as C.N. increases, space between anions increases and larger cations can fit Stretching a polyhedra to fit a larger cation is possible
C.N. calculations Application of pythagorean theorem: c 2 =a 2 +b 2 End up with ranges of R c /R a values corresponding to different C.N.
R c /R a Expected coordinationC.N. <0.152-fold coordination2 0.15Ideal triangular3 0.15-0.22Triangular3 0.22Ideal tetrahedral4 0.22-0.41Tetrahedral4 0.41Ideal octahedral6 0.41-0.73Octahedral6 0.73Ideal cubic8 0.73-1.0Cubic8 1.0Ideal dodecahedral12 >1.0dodecahedral12
Pauling’s Rules for ionic structures 2. Electrostatic Valency Principle –Bond strength = cation valence / C.N. –Sum of bonds to a ion = charge on that ion –Relative bond strengths in a mineral containing >2 different ions: Isodesmic – all bonds have same relative strength Anisodesmic – strength of one bond much stronger than others – simplify much stronger part to be an anionic entity (SO 4 2-, NO 3 -, CO 3 2- ) Mesodesmic – cation-anion bond strength = ½ charge, meaning identical bond strength available for further bonding to cation or other anion
Bond strength – Pauling’s 2 nd Rule Si 4+ Bond Strength = 4 (charge)/4(C.N.) = 1 Bond Strength of Si = ½ the charge of O 2- O 2- has strength (charge) to attract either another Si or a different cation – if it attaches to another Si, the bonds between either Si will be identical O 2- Si 4+ O 2-
Mesodesmic subunit – SiO 4 4- Each Si-O bond has strength of 1 This is ½ the charge of O 2- O 2- then can make an equivalent bond to cations or to another Si 4+ (two Si 4+ then share an O) Reason silicate can easily polymerize to form a number of different structural configurations (and why silicates are hard)
Nesosilicates – SiO 4 4- Sorosilicates – Si 2 O 7 6- Cyclosilicates – Si 6 O 18 12- Inosilicates (single) – Si 2 O 6 4- Inosilicates (double) – Si 4 O 11 6- Phyllosilicates – Si 2 O 5 2- Tectosilicates – SiO 2 0
Pauling’s Rules for ionic structures 3. Sharing of edges or faces by coordinating polyhedra is inherently unstable –This puts cations closer together and they will repel each other
Pauling’s Rules for ionic structures 4. Cations of high charge do not share anions easily with other cations due to high degree of repulsion 5. Principle of Parsimony – Atomic structures tend to be composed of only a few distinct components – they are simple, with only a few types of ions and bonds.