Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights Reserved Bells are tolling for Slightly Edited Condensation of Sister Teresa Forcades’

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights Reserved Bells are tolling for Slightly Edited Condensation of Sister Teresa Forcades’"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Copyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights Reserved Bells are tolling for Slightly Edited Condensation of Sister Teresa Forcades’ Swineflu

3 My name is Teresa Forcades i Villa. I’m a Benedictine nun at Sant Benet of Montserrat’s monastery. Before joining the monastery I practiced medicine for several years. I’m a physician specialized in internal medicine, and I have a PHD in Public Health at Barcelona’s University. I carried out the specialization in the USA, at the State University of NY.

4 We have A, B and C types of known flu viruses affecting humans. “A” type viruses are part of the yearly common flu... the seasonal flu.“A” type viruses are part of the yearly common flu... the seasonal flu. “C” virus normally only affects a smaller proportion of the population & is not used for yearly vaccines.“C” virus normally only affects a smaller proportion of the population & is not used for yearly vaccines. Therefore, every year, the seasonal flu vaccine is a mixture of “A” and “B” type virus.Therefore, every year, the seasonal flu vaccine is a mixture of “A” and “B” type virus. The so-called “new swine flu” is not new just because it’s an “A” type.The so-called “new swine flu” is not new just because it’s an “A” type. Nor because of the antigens of the A- H1N1 virus... the hem agglutinin (H) and the neuraminidase (N).Nor because of the antigens of the A- H1N1 virus... the hem agglutinin (H) and the neuraminidase (N).

5 A-H1N1 was the same flu virus group that in 1918 caused the terrible pandemic It killed more than 20 million people worldwide.It killed more than 20 million people worldwide. It existed amongst the population until around the mid 50s.It existed amongst the population until around the mid 50s. In 1957 it seems to disappear from the known seasonal flu viruses.In 1957 it seems to disappear from the known seasonal flu viruses. But it reappeared in the year 1977But it reappeared in the year 1977

6 WHY? The A-H1N1 virus returned because it had been re-synthesized in a LAB! Re-synthesized, because in 1977 they went to exhume the body of an Inuit Eskimo woman who died from this flu in 1918.Re-synthesized, because in 1977 they went to exhume the body of an Inuit Eskimo woman who died from this flu in As her body remained under the ice it was possible to recover from the tissues the necessary elements to produce again, or to re-synthesize this virus.As her body remained under the ice it was possible to recover from the tissues the necessary elements to produce again, or to re-synthesize this virus. From 1977 A-H1N1 was part of the pool of seasonal flu viruses again.From 1977 A-H1N1 was part of the pool of seasonal flu viruses again. according to “The New England Journal of Medicine” this is an established fact.according to “The New England Journal of Medicine” this is an established fact.

7 Well, what is then new this year? The novelty is this year’s viral strain (S- OIV) unknown until now, first diagnosed April, 17th (2009)The novelty is this year’s viral strain (S- OIV) unknown until now, first diagnosed April, 17th (2009) First scientific fact: Two first cases on record were first diagnosed in California.First scientific fact: Two first cases on record were first diagnosed in California. Second scientific fact: From April until September 15th the statistics recorded 137 deaths in Europe, and 3,559 deaths worldwide. (According to W.H.O!)Second scientific fact: From April until September 15th the statistics recorded 137 deaths in Europe, and 3,559 deaths worldwide. (According to W.H.O!) Can we trust them?—As they don’t analyze each case anymore whether it is seasonal or swine flu! -- PPS EditorCan we trust them?—As they don’t analyze each case anymore whether it is seasonal or swine flu! -- PPS Editor

8 Many declarations, but I’ll quote two… 1. J. Dupre’, member of the National Medical Ethics Committee of France, 2. Rodriquez Sendin, president of the General Spanish Medical Association.1. J. Dupre’, member of the National Medical Ethics Committee of France, 2. Rodriquez Sendin, president of the General Spanish Medical Association. Both prestigious doctors based on scientific data confirmed that this new virus has a lower mortality rate than the common flu & seasonal viruses.Both prestigious doctors based on scientific data confirmed that this new virus has a lower mortality rate than the common flu & seasonal viruses. I end this scientific part with an important piece of data fully accredited in medical literature saying that it seems that people older that 60, have already 33% immunity against this new virus.I end this scientific part with an important piece of data fully accredited in medical literature saying that it seems that people older that 60, have already 33% immunity against this new virus. These are important objective facts to take into account before getting into an in- depth assessment.These are important objective facts to take into account before getting into an in- depth assessment.

9 Two irregularities have taken place in the way or consequences so far of the discovery of this relatively new strain. Two irregularities, to my understanding & of any objective observer, have remained un- clarified, and are too serious to remain un- clarified. First: Investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister, born in Switzerland with Austrian & Irish citizenship, heard about the following, & made this information available. [TC: Jane pressed bioterrorism & mass murder attempt charges against the WHO, the UN, & some CEOs of companies, and governments], Anyone can verify that the information that I'm going to disclose is accurate and objective.

10 So What Happened? In January 2009, before H1N1 was discovered, Baxter Pharmaceutical, a USA company from its Austrian subsidiary company proceeded to distribute via 4 neighboring European countries (Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany), to 16 different laboratories, 72kg of vaccination material for flu, to be given in February & March to those countries, as seasonal flu virus vaccine.In January 2009, before H1N1 was discovered, Baxter Pharmaceutical, a USA company from its Austrian subsidiary company proceeded to distribute via 4 neighboring European countries (Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany), to 16 different laboratories, 72kg of vaccination material for flu, to be given in February & March to those countries, as seasonal flu virus vaccine. 72 kg of this material makes thousands & thousands of doses.72 kg of this material makes thousands & thousands of doses. Through one of life's coincidences, situations or plans are revealed which would have otherwise remained in the dark.Through one of life's coincidences, situations or plans are revealed which would have otherwise remained in the dark. One of the lab technicians of Czech Republic company BioTest, recipient of this material, decided on his own initiative, being qualified but not obliged to do, to carry out an extra security test on the vaccination material before proceeding to distribute.One of the lab technicians of Czech Republic company BioTest, recipient of this material, decided on his own initiative, being qualified but not obliged to do, to carry out an extra security test on the vaccination material before proceeding to distribute. The technician inoculated this vaccine into weasels/ferrets, small mammals used since 1918 to test flu vaccines, and all of them died.The technician inoculated this vaccine into weasels/ferrets, small mammals used since 1918 to test flu vaccines, and all of them died. Observing that the vaccine shouldn't have caused the death of the weasels, he immediately raised the alarm and began checks to establish what this Baxter material contained, because being a vaccine, the death of the animals was inexplicable...Observing that the vaccine shouldn't have caused the death of the weasels, he immediately raised the alarm and began checks to establish what this Baxter material contained, because being a vaccine, the death of the animals was inexplicable... On TVN24 in Poland Baxter has admitted they contaminated 72 KG of vaccine material with the live bird flu virus.

11 Test results showed that in the Baxter material for those 16 laboratories, 2 live viruses coexisted. The bird flu virus appeared in 2005, had a high mortality rate, but infected just a few people. The number of deaths Worldwide, was around 250 but around 60% of those infected died! The mortality rate of this virus is very high, while its infection rate is minimal. BIRDFLU was mixed with seasonal flu that has an extremely low mortality rate, less than 0.01%, but a high degree of transmission/ a highly contagious infection rate. One was the bird flu virus.

12 If you mix these two viruses and then distribute it to thousands of people… you’re maximizing the probabilities for these two viruses to merge, to recombine, and for a new virus to appear, very lethal and very infectious!you’re maximizing the probabilities for these two viruses to merge, to recombine, and for a new virus to appear, very lethal and very infectious! That the 72 Kg of the material contained a mix of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses is a fact! Admitted by Baxter.That the 72 Kg of the material contained a mix of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses is a fact! Admitted by Baxter. They didn’t say “No, this is not true... this is just what by Jane Burgermeister says or whoever, or this material wasn’t there...”They didn’t say “No, this is not true... this is just what by Jane Burgermeister says or whoever, or this material wasn’t there...” Baxter admitted that contamination took place but not that the material was destined for human use.Baxter admitted that contamination took place but not that the material was destined for human use. (Claiming protection behind confidentiality rights, they haven’t disclosed information about its destination).(Claiming protection behind confidentiality rights, they haven’t disclosed information about its destination).

13 72 Kg material contained a mix of live bird flu & seasonal flu! Could this have happened by chance? IT IS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY, because in Science the word impossible... is something we never say. Extremely unlikely means that laboratories handling this kind of viruses have Bio Security Levels in place.IT IS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY, because in Science the word impossible... is something we never say. Extremely unlikely means that laboratories handling this kind of viruses have Bio Security Levels in place. Bio Security Level 3 is the highest & the one that must be applied in this laboratory! Based on known facts the Scientific probability that this may have happened by chance, is extremely low!Bio Security Level 3 is the highest & the one that must be applied in this laboratory! Based on known facts the Scientific probability that this may have happened by chance, is extremely low! Not only this, but also because, mixing two different live viruses, flu vaccine is made with attenuated viruses.Not only this, but also because, mixing two different live viruses, flu vaccine is made with attenuated viruses. So it’s perfectly normal for flu vaccine to contain live virus. This is no exception. But attenuated means that the virus must go through a radiation procedure.So it’s perfectly normal for flu vaccine to contain live virus. This is no exception. But attenuated means that the virus must go through a radiation procedure. These viruses in the whole Baxter material in the Czech Republic hadn’t been attenuated. The odds of it happening by chance, scientifically or from a humanly prudent standpoint, we can’t say it’s 100% impossible but it’s important to let it be known how unlikely it is for an accident to occur under these circumstances.These viruses in the whole Baxter material in the Czech Republic hadn’t been attenuated. The odds of it happening by chance, scientifically or from a humanly prudent standpoint, we can’t say it’s 100% impossible but it’s important to let it be known how unlikely it is for an accident to occur under these circumstances. In any case, this has happened and it’s under investigation.In any case, this has happened and it’s under investigation. UPDATE: The case has now been dropped by Austria’s legal department. Huh?UPDATE: The case has now been dropped by Austria’s legal department. Huh?

14 Jane Burgermeister has pressed charges not just against Baxter, but also against the W.H.O… (World Heath Organization) …and governments of important countries, because it’s more likely to think in terms of malicious intent!…and governments of important countries, because it’s more likely to think in terms of malicious intent! This is what Jane denounces rather than think that there have been a series of chance events almost impossible to conceive.This is what Jane denounces rather than think that there have been a series of chance events almost impossible to conceive. But it’s very important to separate objective facts from those which haven’t been proven yet.But it’s very important to separate objective facts from those which haven’t been proven yet. It’s good that this information we are facilitating, may reach the wider public, the more the better, and to reach those who hearing all this, about the existence of plans from a World elite that wants part of the population to disappear—say, “but... where’s all this coming from? This is science fiction, I’ve never heard about this”.It’s good that this information we are facilitating, may reach the wider public, the more the better, and to reach those who hearing all this, about the existence of plans from a World elite that wants part of the population to disappear—say, “but... where’s all this coming from? This is science fiction, I’ve never heard about this”.

15 I know there are people who have been studying this (population control) for a while, but… I would that my message reached someone who says... “Look I don’t know anything about that stuff, but I’ve just heard that there was a laboratory that delivered contaminated vaccine and that interestingly is one of the laboratories in charge of making flu vaccines this year.” This fact alone makes it justifiable to think that “Until such time as an explanation is given about why this contamination took place I won’t wish it on me, on my child nor on anyone close to me”. I don’t know if I’ve been clear enough about this point. Because I think it’s important to make it clear.

16 A SECOND irregularity, even more scandalous than the first one, happened as follows... What I’ve just said about Baxter happened in February, and on April 17 we had the first diagnosis of the new flu.What I’ve just said about Baxter happened in February, and on April 17 we had the first diagnosis of the new flu. Then on April 29, 12 days after those 2 first cases were discovered, W.H.O Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan (WHO is part of the United Nations), made a public appearance and announced a Level 5 Worldwide state of alert for the prevention of a pandemic.Then on April 29, 12 days after those 2 first cases were discovered, W.H.O Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan (WHO is part of the United Nations), made a public appearance and announced a Level 5 Worldwide state of alert for the prevention of a pandemic. What does this mean? Level 5 is quite a high level, after 5 there is only Level 6 left. Level 6 means a pandemic is already happening.What does this mean? Level 5 is quite a high level, after 5 there is only Level 6 left. Level 6 means a pandemic is already happening. What does a pandemic mean?What does a pandemic mean?

17 How come Dr. M. Chan & the whole World Health Organization declare a pandemic??? On April 29 they say Level 5, just after the appearance of the first cases on April 17th, and a month and a half later, on June 11th... Dr. Chan announces Level 6, the WHO declared a Level 6 Pandemic, the maximum level of health alert. Since then we have a global pandemic of the A-H1N1 virus. How could WHO declare a pandemic, taking into account that this virus has a mortality rate lower than the yearly virus? Then how come there isn’t a pandemic every year, if the yearly virus is worse that this new virus? How come we don’t declare a pandemic every year?

18 Well, it’s quite simple. The answer is that in May 2009 the WHO changed the definition of pandemic from its then current definition of “an infection by an infectious agent simultaneously present in different countries at the same time and with a significant mortality ratio to the proportion of infected population”…Well, it’s quite simple. The answer is that in May 2009 the WHO changed the definition of pandemic from its then current definition of “an infection by an infectious agent simultaneously present in different countries at the same time and with a significant mortality ratio to the proportion of infected population”… …into removing from the definition this mortality characteristic. Therefore the new definition went to describe a pandemic as……into removing from the definition this mortality characteristic. Therefore the new definition went to describe a pandemic as… “a simultaneous infection present in various countries and carrying an infectious agent showing any novelty characteristic thus leaving us unable to know the type of immunity present within the population.”“a simultaneous infection present in various countries and carrying an infectious agent showing any novelty characteristic thus leaving us unable to know the type of immunity present within the population.” “Why don’t we declare a pandemic every year?”

19 So this amended definition is from May this year. IF the mortality requirement disappears from the definition of pandemic…then we should ask ourselves. Well…what prevents the annual common flu from being declared a pandemic?So this amended definition is from May this year. IF the mortality requirement disappears from the definition of pandemic…then we should ask ourselves. Well…what prevents the annual common flu from being declared a pandemic? And the answer is that... with this definition in place, nothing prevents it.And the answer is that... with this definition in place, nothing prevents it. With this definition... what we are seeing now, with this investment... and I’ll get now into the political consequences, which is in fact where I wanted to get to.With this definition... what we are seeing now, with this investment... and I’ll get now into the political consequences, which is in fact where I wanted to get to. With this new definition, and it is a definition... I’m quoting it from the “British Medical Journal” I insist that all this information that I’m giving doesn’t come from the alternative press, for whom I have great respect, but I think it’s important to know that all this information comes from the most prestigious magazines and absolutely “mainstream” as they say in English, free from any possible suspicion of tendentiousness anyway.

20 All that’s happening now seems to be justifiable because of its exceptional nature, under the new definition, It wouldn’t present anything exceptional about it. So this would be the situation year after year, and this is just with the flu, not to mention other diseases with the same characteristics...It wouldn’t present anything exceptional about it. So this would be the situation year after year, and this is just with the flu, not to mention other diseases with the same characteristics... One may say... wait a minute... Isn’t it true that this virus is less lethal... that it presents a lower mortality rate than the annual seasonal virus?One may say... wait a minute... Isn’t it true that this virus is less lethal... that it presents a lower mortality rate than the annual seasonal virus? And this fact can be read everywhere, everybody says so...even our minister (Health MP) here... They admit this is the case.And this fact can be read everywhere, everybody says so...even our minister (Health MP) here... They admit this is the case. Well if this is the case...how can it be that a pandemic has been declared bearing in mind the serious political consequences?Well if this is the case...how can it be that a pandemic has been declared bearing in mind the serious political consequences? So this is perhaps the new piece of information that I’m giving that...and I insist it’s from the “British Medical Journal”: that the definition of pandemic has changed, but this can be seen by anyone by asking WHO to send you the pandemic definition from 2008 and 2009, and there you can see that this change exists. It can also be read on their web site, etc.

21 Due to the 11th June pandemic declaration because of the new virus, the US declared Public Health National Emergency This emergency declaration also carries political consequences. It was possible in the US having in April 20 cases of infection and 0 deaths.This emergency declaration also carries political consequences. It was possible in the US having in April 20 cases of infection and 0 deaths. With 20 cases of people infected, all of them documented, it’s important to know that the documentation is not so reliable, and not being carried out now, because WHO said to stop verifying with lab tests who had swine flu or not.With 20 cases of people infected, all of them documented, it’s important to know that the documentation is not so reliable, and not being carried out now, because WHO said to stop verifying with lab tests who had swine flu or not. In the UK it’s done by phone consultation where a person reports the flu symptoms, then they note down swine flu. This is how it’s done now!In the UK it’s done by phone consultation where a person reports the flu symptoms, then they note down swine flu. This is how it’s done now! So when they say there are 12, ,000 cases... it’s important to know the way in which these figures are worked out. These objective facts can be verified on the official web site.So when they say there are 12, ,000 cases... it’s important to know the way in which these figures are worked out. These objective facts can be verified on the official web site. Therefore we’re assuming that every flu case is a case. In some countries they make surveys... based on... “we had 100 and 50 were swine flu cases, so we assume the rest is also that way”Therefore we’re assuming that every flu case is a case. In some countries they make surveys... based on... “we had 100 and 50 were swine flu cases, so we assume the rest is also that way” But this survey or generalization lacks sufficient data at least on the ones I’ve seen in the books.But this survey or generalization lacks sufficient data at least on the ones I’ve seen in the books. [Thus far the irregularities.][Thus far the irregularities.] In the document that I’m disseminating I also quote an article from an American journal, where they explain that after visiting the WHO website they commented “Listen, here it says that high mortality is a pre-requisite for a pandemic and here nobody dies...” They told them, wait a minute... and they changed the definition on the web... this article has been quoted and it’s from CNN which is not a source under suspicion in this sense. Therefore the WHO irregularity seems even more serious to me, because it’s equally objective, clear and easy to verity, and it brings us closer to the possible real consequences so it’s not just about elaborating on possible intentions or who did what. As you’ve seen I’ve stopped there, because I like to distinguish between what I can prove from what I cannot but about what is already happening now because of this definition.In the document that I’m disseminating I also quote an article from an American journal, where they explain that after visiting the WHO website they commented “Listen, here it says that high mortality is a pre-requisite for a pandemic and here nobody dies...” They told them, wait a minute... and they changed the definition on the web... this article has been quoted and it’s from CNN which is not a source under suspicion in this sense. Therefore the WHO irregularity seems even more serious to me, because it’s equally objective, clear and easy to verity, and it brings us closer to the possible real consequences so it’s not just about elaborating on possible intentions or who did what. As you’ve seen I’ve stopped there, because I like to distinguish between what I can prove from what I cannot but about what is already happening now because of this definition.CNN

22 PART 3: Focus on The Political Consequences of a Pandemic Declaration. WHO is an international organization that normally issues recommendations... “WHO’s recommendations are...”WHO is an international organization that normally issues recommendations... “WHO’s recommendations are...” Then each sovereign country applies or not the recommendations following its own criteria, its own circumstances, and its own internal research.Then each sovereign country applies or not the recommendations following its own criteria, its own circumstances, and its own internal research. In 2005 this changed allowing an exception precisely in case of a pandemic,In 2005 this changed allowing an exception precisely in case of a pandemic, This means that in case of a pandemic WHO doesn’t make recommendations, it gives orders.This means that in case of a pandemic WHO doesn’t make recommendations, it gives orders. This means that countries—this is a verifiable & objective fact—in case of a pandemic... and a pandemic is something very serious, as in the old definition, a real serious threat to the health of the whole population, that justifies this medical emergency. It does within the context of the old definition, but not in the new one we have now!This means that countries—this is a verifiable & objective fact—in case of a pandemic... and a pandemic is something very serious, as in the old definition, a real serious threat to the health of the whole population, that justifies this medical emergency. It does within the context of the old definition, but not in the new one we have now! Therefore with the present definition, the title has remained the same, global pandemic, but its contents have totally changed, because the significant mortality rate doesn’t exist.Therefore with the present definition, the title has remained the same, global pandemic, but its contents have totally changed, because the significant mortality rate doesn’t exist. But the political consequences remain because of the heading! There the law says, “in case of a pandemic”... or the internal rules, or WHO’s regulations within their treaties and agreements with the member countries.But the political consequences remain because of the heading! There the law says, “in case of a pandemic”... or the internal rules, or WHO’s regulations within their treaties and agreements with the member countries.

23 Since 2005 when faced with a pandemic W.H.O DOESN’T recommend but ORDERS member countries which actions to take. That’s why we hear from the authorities in Spain, “Were awaiting WHO’s recommendations...”That’s why we hear from the authorities in Spain, “Were awaiting WHO’s recommendations...” Perhaps that’s a manner of speech... but it’s not just that they are waiting for them because they think it’s the right thing to do, but because they have to abide by them, not as recommendation but as order from the moment that it’s issued.Perhaps that’s a manner of speech... but it’s not just that they are waiting for them because they think it’s the right thing to do, but because they have to abide by them, not as recommendation but as order from the moment that it’s issued. You may ask, “Well, what terrible thing may happen?”You may ask, “Well, what terrible thing may happen?” Well... the mandatory vaccination. This is the most important point to me!Well... the mandatory vaccination. This is the most important point to me! It’s so important to spread this information so that even if vaccination is offered on a voluntary basis, the more people know about the circumstances surrounding this vaccine and all the facts the better, so that each one of us can make an informed decision.It’s so important to spread this information so that even if vaccination is offered on a voluntary basis, the more people know about the circumstances surrounding this vaccine and all the facts the better, so that each one of us can make an informed decision.

24 Next point: About the real possibility that this vaccine was issued, or distributed, or announced as a mandatory vaccine. How can it be possible that I’m forced to accept a vaccine that I don’t wish to have?How can it be possible that I’m forced to accept a vaccine that I don’t wish to have? Well the reasoning is quite clear... IF we are in a global pandemic situation, although I insist even if in the present case it doesn’t qualify..., it seems that there’s a risk that if a person doesn’t take the shot this may put other people’s health at riskWell the reasoning is quite clear... IF we are in a global pandemic situation, although I insist even if in the present case it doesn’t qualify..., it seems that there’s a risk that if a person doesn’t take the shot this may put other people’s health at risk Therefore the member countries are under obligation to ensure that the law is obeyed.Therefore the member countries are under obligation to ensure that the law is obeyed. If this is the law, what would this mean?If this is the law, what would this mean? Well, the same as usual: Fine or prison!Well, the same as usual: Fine or prison! Talking about fines. It seems that in Massachusetts, a document has already been made public in preparation for a possible mandatory vaccination,Talking about fines. It seems that in Massachusetts, a document has already been made public in preparation for a possible mandatory vaccination, Massachusettsdocument Massachusettsdocument If this was the case, the fine would be or could reach up to 1,000 Dollars a day.If this was the case, the fine would be or could reach up to 1,000 Dollars a day. So it works this way, You say: “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars daily from civil service for every day you don’t take the vaccine.”So it works this way, You say: “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars daily from civil service for every day you don’t take the vaccine.”

25 You say: “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars fine, for every day you don’t get the vaccine!” Other ways are happening already now, but without a law of compulsory nature! There are companies that say to their workers, “if you don’t take the shot, I fire you.”Other ways are happening already now, but without a law of compulsory nature! There are companies that say to their workers, “if you don’t take the shot, I fire you.” There are open lawsuits in different countries, in the US, UK, France, because there are people that have already faced this dilemma, and have tried to refuse, and in some cases in private companies, where there’s no collective labour agreement, in US for instance!There are open lawsuits in different countries, in the US, UK, France, because there are people that have already faced this dilemma, and have tried to refuse, and in some cases in private companies, where there’s no collective labour agreement, in US for instance! This has already made people lose their job for refusing to accept this vaccine. And you may say: “but there’s no vaccine yet.”This has already made people lose their job for refusing to accept this vaccine. And you may say: “but there’s no vaccine yet.” Not yet, but the one already in distribution, we already have, the seasonal flu. This has been delivered sooner. Because WHO has recommended to give, the seasonal one and then, in most of the cases, in two doses, the new flu one.Not yet, but the one already in distribution, we already have, the seasonal flu. This has been delivered sooner. Because WHO has recommended to give, the seasonal one and then, in most of the cases, in two doses, the new flu one.

26 Then, what might happen to a person who refuses to get this vaccine? If the vaccine is not mandatory, as it isn’t in any country now, then nothing will happen! You say ‘no’, and sign a document if necessary, and the same for your children, they don’t get it and no problem.If the vaccine is not mandatory, as it isn’t in any country now, then nothing will happen! You say ‘no’, and sign a document if necessary, and the same for your children, they don’t get it and no problem. In case the vaccine is mandatory, a fine or prison sentence must be applied in a country. If there’s a law, it must be obeyed, otherwise it’d be a joke.In case the vaccine is mandatory, a fine or prison sentence must be applied in a country. If there’s a law, it must be obeyed, otherwise it’d be a joke. Let’s see, facing this, this daily 1,000 Dollars fine, or the possibility of a prison sentence, one would say, “OK, let’s not exaggerate, I got the vaccine every year! Or: Not me but my father has, or I know people who get it, so we simply get it this year, and it’s alright. Look a disaster, they’re making money, as always, as happened with the papilloma, but what can I say, I’m not paying a 1,000 Dollars a day, or I’m not risking going to prison”.Let’s see, facing this, this daily 1,000 Dollars fine, or the possibility of a prison sentence, one would say, “OK, let’s not exaggerate, I got the vaccine every year! Or: Not me but my father has, or I know people who get it, so we simply get it this year, and it’s alright. Look a disaster, they’re making money, as always, as happened with the papilloma, but what can I say, I’m not paying a 1,000 Dollars a day, or I’m not risking going to prison”. Facing this possible answer, it is important to know THREE FACTORS that make the vaccine of swine flu, of this year’s flu, DIFFERENT from EVERY year’s vaccine! I mean, this argument of it “being the same as every year’s vaccine, but this time it’s for the swine virus. Well then we’ll take it, we’ve been fooled once again, politicians or whoever”,…Facing this possible answer, it is important to know THREE FACTORS that make the vaccine of swine flu, of this year’s flu, DIFFERENT from EVERY year’s vaccine! I mean, this argument of it “being the same as every year’s vaccine, but this time it’s for the swine virus. Well then we’ll take it, we’ve been fooled once again, politicians or whoever”,… BUT IT’S NOT GOING TO BE THE LAST TIME!BUT IT’S NOT GOING TO BE THE LAST TIME!

27 Three novelties, that this vaccine has, in contrast with the yearly vaccine. WHY IS THIS VACCINE NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME AS EVERY YEAR?WHY IS THIS VACCINE NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME AS EVERY YEAR? The first novelty is, I have already said it, because WHO recommends, most of the pharmaceuticals that are producing this vaccine, recommend it to be given IN TWO DOSES. That’s the novelty!The first novelty is, I have already said it, because WHO recommends, most of the pharmaceuticals that are producing this vaccine, recommend it to be given IN TWO DOSES. That’s the novelty! Nobody has ever heard before that flu vaccines come in two doses. Normally it’s given once and that’s all... next year you take it again, but it’s never given in two doses. This year it comes in two doses, and also as I said, WHO has already recommended, in fact, the vaccine delivery has already arrived at senior care homes, monasteries and other places, so that everybody takes the vaccine for the seasonal virus.Nobody has ever heard before that flu vaccines come in two doses. Normally it’s given once and that’s all... next year you take it again, but it’s never given in two doses. This year it comes in two doses, and also as I said, WHO has already recommended, in fact, the vaccine delivery has already arrived at senior care homes, monasteries and other places, so that everybody takes the vaccine for the seasonal virus. IF the WHO’s recommendations are followed this year, those who follow them, will end up receiving THREE FLU VACCINATIONS, the seasonal one, the first dose for swine flu...and the 2 nd one! I’ve also heard that some laboratories produce it just in one, but most of them have announced it will be a vaccine in two doses...IF the WHO’s recommendations are followed this year, those who follow them, will end up receiving THREE FLU VACCINATIONS, the seasonal one, the first dose for swine flu...and the 2 nd one! I’ve also heard that some laboratories produce it just in one, but most of them have announced it will be a vaccine in two doses... Therefore, the seasonal one, that is already available this month, the first dose for the swine flu, and the second dose.Therefore, the seasonal one, that is already available this month, the first dose for the swine flu, and the second dose. That way, the possibility of secondary effects is multiplied by three, theoretically it’s multiplied by three, and these vaccines do have secondary effect.That way, the possibility of secondary effects is multiplied by three, theoretically it’s multiplied by three, and these vaccines do have secondary effect. But this is only theoretical, in practice, nobody knows what could happen, because it’s never been done before. Because no one has ever before received three doses of the virus, three shots with alive viruses of the flu, and from different types... one after the other, in the middle of a supposed pandemic or flu season.But this is only theoretical, in practice, nobody knows what could happen, because it’s never been done before. Because no one has ever before received three doses of the virus, three shots with alive viruses of the flu, and from different types... one after the other, in the middle of a supposed pandemic or flu season. THIS IS THE FIRST NOVELTY, THIS IS NEW!THIS IS THE FIRST NOVELTY, THIS IS NEW!

28 2nd novelty: the untested co-adjuvants. The National Nurse Labour Union of France has published a document that you can also check where they talk about the company Glaxo Smith Kline, one of the Pharmaceuticals that produce the vaccine, in fact is responsible for the research with children that it’s done in Spain, the pioneer country of the world that has accepted that children from 6 months to 17 years old, try an experimental vaccine, and thus see what the secondary effects may be, or what point they reach!The National Nurse Labour Union of France has published a document that you can also check where they talk about the company Glaxo Smith Kline, one of the Pharmaceuticals that produce the vaccine, in fact is responsible for the research with children that it’s done in Spain, the pioneer country of the world that has accepted that children from 6 months to 17 years old, try an experimental vaccine, and thus see what the secondary effects may be, or what point they reach! GSK is the company that promotes this research. This company is using a co-adjuvant in those flu vaccines, that’s never been used before. And this, in different ways, all companies that produce swine flu vaccines have announced that they use these kinds of stronger co-adjuvants than the kinds that are normally used every year for flu vaccines.GSK is the company that promotes this research. This company is using a co-adjuvant in those flu vaccines, that’s never been used before. And this, in different ways, all companies that produce swine flu vaccines have announced that they use these kinds of stronger co-adjuvants than the kinds that are normally used every year for flu vaccines. What is a co-adjuvant? A co-adjuvant is a substance that’s generally added to the flu vaccine. The objective of the co-adjuvant being added, is to stimulate and excite the immune system to produce a higher immune system response. This is mainly done for the vaccine to be more effective. But in this case, French nurses have denounced that this co-adjuvant will be multiplied ten times. This is the intention in the first studies, to multiply ten times the immune system response! Excite the immune system of the person so much that it produces a response ten times higher than the normal common one.What is a co-adjuvant? A co-adjuvant is a substance that’s generally added to the flu vaccine. The objective of the co-adjuvant being added, is to stimulate and excite the immune system to produce a higher immune system response. This is mainly done for the vaccine to be more effective. But in this case, French nurses have denounced that this co-adjuvant will be multiplied ten times. This is the intention in the first studies, to multiply ten times the immune system response! Excite the immune system of the person so much that it produces a response ten times higher than the normal common one.

29 2nd novelty: The Anthrax Co-adjuvants. This co-adjuvant seems to mix polysorbate with the excipient, or the co-adjuvant squalene, which is the same one used against Anthrax, and was given to the soldiers in the Gulf War.This co-adjuvant seems to mix polysorbate with the excipient, or the co-adjuvant squalene, which is the same one used against Anthrax, and was given to the soldiers in the Gulf War. There are many studies that prove that they had serious secondary effects, in terms of central neurological system, paralysis and arthritis!There are many studies that prove that they had serious secondary effects, in terms of central neurological system, paralysis and arthritis! That’s squalene! This new co-adjuvant is, therefore, the second novelty.That’s squalene! This new co-adjuvant is, therefore, the second novelty. These are co-adjuvants still untested, and pharmaceutical companies justify that precisely because they’ve asked to produce millions and millions, in fact billions, 4.6 billion doses of this vaccine! It’s what has been set up, to vaccinate the whole population.These are co-adjuvants still untested, and pharmaceutical companies justify that precisely because they’ve asked to produce millions and millions, in fact billions, 4.6 billion doses of this vaccine! It’s what has been set up, to vaccinate the whole population. Rich countries and those pharmaceuticals have already announced that they are making donations of millions of doses to third world countries that couldn’t afford it.Rich countries and those pharmaceuticals have already announced that they are making donations of millions of doses to third world countries that couldn’t afford it. SO THE PLAN IS TO VACCINATE THE WHOLE WORLD POPULATION.SO THE PLAN IS TO VACCINATE THE WHOLE WORLD POPULATION.

30 2nd novelty: Co-adjuvants are dangerous! These production conditions, some pharmaceutical companies justify using still untested co-adjuvants, so that they can add fewer antigens. -They save. They can save antigen and in each injected dose of vaccine fewer antigens and more co- adjuvant. Which means, less natural immune system excitation, and more artificial excitation to compensate for the lack of antigen to produce vaccines.These production conditions, some pharmaceutical companies justify using still untested co-adjuvants, so that they can add fewer antigens. -They save. They can save antigen and in each injected dose of vaccine fewer antigens and more co- adjuvant. Which means, less natural immune system excitation, and more artificial excitation to compensate for the lack of antigen to produce vaccines. This is the official explanation. This is the second novelty; The co-adjuvant is not the same as every year. Therefore nobody knows to what degree this artificial excitation of the immune system is going to cause autoimmune diseases.This is the official explanation. This is the second novelty; The co-adjuvant is not the same as every year. Therefore nobody knows to what degree this artificial excitation of the immune system is going to cause autoimmune diseases. In fact there’s one, the ascending paralysis of Guillain-Barre’. This is known from or associated with the administering of Swine flu vaccines in At that time it just affected the US, in a similar campaign we’re living through now, also via the mass media and politicians.In fact there’s one, the ascending paralysis of Guillain-Barre’. This is known from or associated with the administering of Swine flu vaccines in At that time it just affected the US, in a similar campaign we’re living through now, also via the mass media and politicians. In that campaign they ended up vaccinating 48 million US citizens. Among those 48 million there were around 3,000 complaints of paralysis with the Guillain- Barre’ syndrome. And this is accepted as a consequence.In that campaign they ended up vaccinating 48 million US citizens. Among those 48 million there were around 3,000 complaints of paralysis with the Guillain- Barre’ syndrome. And this is accepted as a consequence. In fact the CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States (www.cdc.gov), have already announced that it is inevitable that there will be paralysis cases if the whole of the population gets the vaccine, but, despite this, they’re going ahead with it.In fact the CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States (www.cdc.gov), have already announced that it is inevitable that there will be paralysis cases if the whole of the population gets the vaccine, but, despite this, they’re going ahead with it.www.cdc.gov While I insist we must always keep in mind that this swine flu virus is more benign than the usual virus, therefore considering all pros and cons as the French nurses did in their document, the option of spending a few days at home with flu, like every year, in fact less than every year, OR the possibility of suffering a creeping paralysis, which in some cases people recover from but in many cases don’t, that can even lead to death, then... at least THIS INFORMATION MUST REACH EVERYBODY SO EVERYONE TAKES RESPONSIBILITY.While I insist we must always keep in mind that this swine flu virus is more benign than the usual virus, therefore considering all pros and cons as the French nurses did in their document, the option of spending a few days at home with flu, like every year, in fact less than every year, OR the possibility of suffering a creeping paralysis, which in some cases people recover from but in many cases don’t, that can even lead to death, then... at least THIS INFORMATION MUST REACH EVERYBODY SO EVERYONE TAKES RESPONSIBILITY.

31 And the last, THIRD novelty regarding this year’s vaccines: Non-Liability Agreements!!! Third novelty is that pharmaceutical companies, because they’ve been asked, supposedly, to make this extraordinary effort to produce such a vast amount of doses in record time, they are forcing agreements, and in the US it’s official that this agreement has been signed, AGREEMENTS TO ABSOLVE THEM OF ANY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CASE THAT THIS VACCINE HAS ADVERSE SECONDARY EFFECTS OR EVEN IF IT CAUSES DEATH.Third novelty is that pharmaceutical companies, because they’ve been asked, supposedly, to make this extraordinary effort to produce such a vast amount of doses in record time, they are forcing agreements, and in the US it’s official that this agreement has been signed, AGREEMENTS TO ABSOLVE THEM OF ANY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CASE THAT THIS VACCINE HAS ADVERSE SECONDARY EFFECTS OR EVEN IF IT CAUSES DEATH. In the US, the Secretary of Health, Sibelius, signed a document that gives immunity, political immunity.In the US, the Secretary of Health, Sibelius, signed a document that gives immunity, political immunity.signed It won’t be possible to ask for responsibilities nor compensation, nor from the involved politicians nor from the pharmaceutical companies.It won’t be possible to ask for responsibilities nor compensation, nor from the involved politicians nor from the pharmaceutical companies. This is a the novelty that I think is very significant, for money can’t buy health or life, but if the pharmaceutical company or the responsible person is not willing to financially compensate... we can take it as guarantee that it is not unforeseen to have an avalanche of complaints.This is a the novelty that I think is very significant, for money can’t buy health or life, but if the pharmaceutical company or the responsible person is not willing to financially compensate... we can take it as guarantee that it is not unforeseen to have an avalanche of complaints. If the responsible person makes sure, with objective, clear, and verifiable public documents, that it won’t be possible to bring a lawsuit against them, he is taking from us a guarantee that this vaccine is not going to have adverse secondary effects.If the responsible person makes sure, with objective, clear, and verifiable public documents, that it won’t be possible to bring a lawsuit against them, he is taking from us a guarantee that this vaccine is not going to have adverse secondary effects.

32 To Sum Things Up! What happened with Baxter and those vaccines proven to be contaminated, we don’t know why or how, but that they were contaminated we DO know for sure,…What happened with Baxter and those vaccines proven to be contaminated, we don’t know why or how, but that they were contaminated we DO know for sure,… IF this contamination hadn’t been discovered by chance in February 2009, today we would have had this terrible pandemic! But they’re talking about this pandemic without a real or objective basis.IF this contamination hadn’t been discovered by chance in February 2009, today we would have had this terrible pandemic! But they’re talking about this pandemic without a real or objective basis. If it hadn’t been discovered by chance by this Czech researcher or lab technician who carried that test, which he didn’t have to, today we would have had this pandemic that is being announced.If it hadn’t been discovered by chance by this Czech researcher or lab technician who carried that test, which he didn’t have to, today we would have had this pandemic that is being announced.

33 Why Did the Media Black Out The Baxter Affaire? Knowing this, and keeping in mind the current WHO legislation, and the irregularities for instance, how is it possible that, what happened in February, has not been discussed in the international press? How is it possible that politicians haven’t talked about it? THIS HASN’T HAD ANY POLITICAL OR MEDIA IMPACT. THEY MUCH PREFER TO PRINT THIS KIND OF SCARE PROPA- GANDA. The Irish “Sunday S**t Rag!”

34 A Real Risk That Vaccines May be Contaminated How is all this possible? Keeping in mind that the pandemic would have happened if this hadn’t been discovered by chance, I think it’s very important to state that the real threat, that those vaccines, which will arrive very soon, are or may be contaminated!How is all this possible? Keeping in mind that the pandemic would have happened if this hadn’t been discovered by chance, I think it’s very important to state that the real threat, that those vaccines, which will arrive very soon, are or may be contaminated! And that despite the fact they may be contaminated, a coercive legislation could be imposed that could force all of the population to take this vaccine by law, I think this is a risk that cannot be and must not be minimized.And that despite the fact they may be contaminated, a coercive legislation could be imposed that could force all of the population to take this vaccine by law, I think this is a risk that cannot be and must not be minimized. But promoting, spreading & sharing information like I’m doing, may be important as we still have time for a reaction!But promoting, spreading & sharing information like I’m doing, may be important as we still have time for a reaction! That’s why I think this initiative is so important. Therefore don’t minimize it.That’s why I think this initiative is so important. Therefore don’t minimize it. This is just a risk! I can’t say for sure that vaccines will be contaminated, I haven’t made nor analyzed them! I don’t think it’s going to be easy either, to get access to this vaccine in order to analyze it independently. If possible we’ll try have help to do it. But I don’t know anybody who is able to do it.This is just a risk! I can’t say for sure that vaccines will be contaminated, I haven’t made nor analyzed them! I don’t think it’s going to be easy either, to get access to this vaccine in order to analyze it independently. If possible we’ll try have help to do it. But I don’t know anybody who is able to do it.

35 Don’t panic! But what happens, when more people start dying?! Or if there’s a mutation?! What happens if more people start dying now? Or like was announced, that a second wave is coming and a mutation is coming? It’s very important to know that swine flu virus has not mutated in 70 years!What happens if more people start dying now? Or like was announced, that a second wave is coming and a mutation is coming? It’s very important to know that swine flu virus has not mutated in 70 years! Then how is it possible to announce a mutation this year when this virus is not known to have ever mutated during a period of 70 years?Then how is it possible to announce a mutation this year when this virus is not known to have ever mutated during a period of 70 years? What we didn’t have for 70 years is a flu coming in two waves with different viruses. This is also an irregularity.What we didn’t have for 70 years is a flu coming in two waves with different viruses. This is also an irregularity. But let’s assume that many people start dying now, because of the flu or with compatible symptoms, then it will be even more important to refuse this vaccination, for TWO REASONS: First because if this virus starts giving an increased mortality, it’s because it’s not the same. That is, it will have mutated although it’s something that doesn’t agree with up-to-date data.But let’s assume that many people start dying now, because of the flu or with compatible symptoms, then it will be even more important to refuse this vaccination, for TWO REASONS: First because if this virus starts giving an increased mortality, it’s because it’s not the same. That is, it will have mutated although it’s something that doesn’t agree with up-to-date data. IF it has mutated, the vaccine that’s been produced now, is not of USE anymore! This is why every year a different vaccine is produced, because there are mutations, we have to produce a vaccine adapted to the new mutation.IF it has mutated, the vaccine that’s been produced now, is not of USE anymore! This is why every year a different vaccine is produced, because there are mutations, we have to produce a vaccine adapted to the new mutation. So if an important amount of population doesn’t die, it is not necessary to take the vaccine, because the risk is very high, the risk may be higher than the benefit.So if an important amount of population doesn’t die, it is not necessary to take the vaccine, because the risk is very high, the risk may be higher than the benefit.

36 Only 2 Possible Reasons For a High Rate of Mortality! If we start seeing a high rate of mortality caused by this flu, or because of compatible symptoms, then, this surprise could only be due to two reasons.If we start seeing a high rate of mortality caused by this flu, or because of compatible symptoms, then, this surprise could only be due to two reasons. The first is that the virus has mutated, therefore the vaccine is not good.The first is that the virus has mutated, therefore the vaccine is not good. Or second, It is another virus or other viruses, and therefore, the vaccine is not good either,Or second, It is another virus or other viruses, and therefore, the vaccine is not good either, And it could even be the vaccine itself the means of transmission of those new viruses, according to what happened with Baxter in February. This is where my thoughts lead me.And it could even be the vaccine itself the means of transmission of those new viruses, according to what happened with Baxter in February. This is where my thoughts lead me. My proposal is very clear. Stay calm, take your usual precautions to not get infected, common sense precautions, and do not get the vaccination this year because there are all those circumstances.My proposal is very clear. Stay calm, take your usual precautions to not get infected, common sense precautions, and do not get the vaccination this year because there are all those circumstances. This is my recommendation, but is also the recommendation of common sense...This is my recommendation, but is also the recommendation of common sense... I appeal from this document & visual platform, to activate urgently all civil citizenship and legal resources, to avoid two things in our country. First. That no one can force anybody in this country to get a vaccine they do not want to get. And Second, that those who of their own will desire to get the vaccination, won’t be deprived of their right to ask for responsibilities of financial compensation in case the vaccine causes them serious disease or death! So….

37 Rise Up & Take Action! And visit the TODAY!

38 'Be Still and Know that I AM GOD‘ Psalm 46:19 And Pray & trust in the greatest doctor in the Universe!


Download ppt "Copyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights Reserved Bells are tolling for Slightly Edited Condensation of Sister Teresa Forcades’"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google