Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBryce Osborn Stafford Modified about 1 year ago

1
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov, E.A.Matyushevskiy JINR, Dubna

2
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct The task definition The main task is to provide the design of a magnet with: the working angular acceptance at least of 50° for the height of a gap (1.2 m) and 60° for the width of a gap (1.4 m), and, for the mounting inside the gap MVD/STS detectors, the sizes of its rectangular part should be at least 1.2 x 1.2 m ; the magnetic yoke size along the beam is equal to 1 m; the integral of the magnetic field in the region of the yoke of the magnet along the beam from 1 to 1.2 T*m; the magnetic field distribution, which is similar to the map “FieldMuonMagnet”, that is the current standard for the magnetic field for CBM simulations.

3
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Technical drawing 1. Beam; 2. Rack; 3. Coil; 4. Adapter; 5. Filler; 6. Support of a magnet; 7. Magnetic screens.

4
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct The conceptual project of a magnet

5
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Yoke of the magnet Yoke material: magnetically soft steel with the low content of carbon Yoke sizes: 280 (310) x 260 x 100 [cm] 2.8 m 1.4 m 1.2 m m 1m

6
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Windings («the Cossack saddle») The top part of a winding with cryostat Coil Nitric screen

7
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Cryostat Top part of cryostat (front view) Top & bottom cryostats with connectors (back view) m m two adapters: - current connection; - elements of monitoring systems; - transportation of helium and nitric.

8
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct SC winding cross-section Vacuum casing 4.5˚K < 80˚K 300˚K Nitric screenHelium vessel SC cable Cover of a vacuum casing Helium pipe Support of the nitric screen Hatches Pipe of the nitric screen (circulating liquid nitrogen) 328 mm mm

9
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct General view of the magnet Filler facility: - evacuation of energy; - inputs for submission of liquid helium and liquid nitrogen.

10
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Magnet geometry implementation for TOSCA

11
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Comparison with “MuonMagnet” Used in CBM: “MuonMagnet”New design: “Muon4”

12
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Blue – FieldMuonMagnet Red - FieldMuon4 |By| (z) x=y=0 (target: z=0 cm)

13
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (z,y) x=0 (target: z=0 cm) Vertical plane along the beam:

14
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (z,y) x=0 (target: z=0 cm) Vertical plane along the beam:

15
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=0 (target position) z=0 Vertical plane perpendicular to the beam:

16
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=0 (target position) z=0 Vertical plane perpendicular to the beam:

17
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=50 cm (magnet yoke center) z=50

18
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=50 cm (magnet yoke center) z=50

19
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=50 cm (in the limits of Station 4)

20
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=100 cm (edge of the magnet yoke) z=100

21
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=100 cm (edge of the magnet yoke) z=100

22
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=160 |B| (x,y) z=160 cm (RICH entrance)

23
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| (x,y) z=160 cm (RICH entrance) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

24
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Let us consider Standard and Compact RICH cases: Data obtained from materials published on the site CbmRichMeeting Twiki

25
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=180 |B| (x,y) z=180 cm (photodetector plane for Compact RICH)

26
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=180 cm (photodetector areas for Compact RICH) (->0.04) (0.04->0.036)

27
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=180 |Bxy| z=180 cm (photodetector plane for Compact RICH) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

28
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| z=180 cm (photodetector areas for Compact RICH) (->0.03) (->0.015)

29
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=190 cm (photodetector plane for Standard RICH) z=190

30
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=190 cm (photodetector areas for Standard RICH) (->0.03)0.068 (->0.03) 0.034(->0.029)

31
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| z=190 cm (photodetector plane for Standard RICH) (->0.03) (->0.02)

32
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Geometry implementation for Geant (cbmroot) Yoke +Coils +Nitric Screen +Cryostat +Magnetic Screens & Basement

33
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Compatibility with STS geometry

34
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct I) The suggested engineering design of the superconductive dipole magnet for CBM provides the following characteristics: angular acceptance is 50° for the height of the gap (1.2 m) and 60° for the longest part of the width of the gap (1.4 m), and the sizes of the rectangular part of the gap x 120 cm should be suitable for the mounting of MVD/STS detectors; the magnetic yoke size along the beam is equal to 1 m; the integral of the magnetic field in the region of the yoke of the magnet along the beam is equal to 1.07 T*m when the current through the coils is set to a value MA (in the case of “MuonMagnet” the current equal to MA corresponds to the integral equal to 1.01 T*m); the distribution of By component of the magnetic field along the beam axis is very close to the map “FieldMuonMagnet”; the mean values of the the new magnetic field in the regions, in which the RICH photodetectors are to be placed, are about 300 Gs for the last calculated field map. II) The 3D model of the magnet was developed for TOSCA. The magnetic field map was calculated and converted for cbmroot. A new C++ class was developed to support the changes in the symmetry of the field. III) The Geant geometry of the magnet was created for cbmroot and tested together with the latest available STS geometry. IV) The final decision about the sizes, shape and positions of the magnetic screens and the basement (and material of the basement) will be made after further studies directed to the magnet optimization. Conclusion and outlook

35
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Backup slides …

36
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) z=154

37
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) z=154

38
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

39
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| and |By| (z,y) in linear scale

40
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct “No magnetic screen” vs “Screen” cases

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google