2. 2 Localisation Cap de La Hague COGEMA Cherbourg Barfleur Valognes Les Pieux Carteret La Haye du Puits Carentan

3. 3 Bases of the local nuclear acceptance (Oskarshamn Sweden 1995)  Population’s safety is not negociable  Transparency and rigt to access information for each citizen  Local participation in the decision making process  Responsible radioactive waste management  Sustainable economic development of affected areas

4. 4 Different expectations and challenges for different players  Population and local representatives Economic activity and jobs  Industrial companies Industrial strategy and future of the entreprise  Political parties Elections and governmental coalitions EPR and nuclear at Flamanville or elsewhere

5. 5 To live and work in their native region  The granit quarries : 17th century - 1960  The iron mine : 1855-1962  The nuclear power plant : 1975 

6. 6 The cap of Flamanville

7. 7 The granit quarries

8. 8 The iron mine Exemple : Flamanville Basse Normandie 1,42 MH Manche 481 000 habitants Communauté de commune des Pieux 15 communes 12 700 habitants Flamanville 1 700 habitants

9. 9 The nuclear power plant

10. 10 What we need ? Before : « A franker, more radical and more integral debate » Now : not a lasting debate, but a lasting decision

11. 11 A key for local confidence How to go to the making lasting decision process from the making decision process

12. 12 EPR project, a challenge : EPR : A fully integration into society and environnement