1. How subversive! And how it takes to subvert... Alma Swan SPARC Europe Key Perspectives Ltd Enabling Open Scholarship IGeLU Conference, Oxford, 15-17 September 2014

2. Spirit or soul

4. The Subversive Proposal 27 June 1994 Recommended authors post their papers on anonymous ftp sites arXiv started in 1991 And still flourishes...

5. PROGRESS

6. What happened next World Wide Web

10. Levels of OA in the UK

12. Why so low after 20 years? Authors: –Lack of awareness –Lack of understanding –Overdose of misunderstandings –Fear of repercussions –Reward systems in academia entrench conservative behaviour –Glacial pace of academic adoption of the Web

13. Why so low after 20 years? Publishers (some of them!): –Hindrance –Obstruction –Obfuscation –FUD

14. Why so low after 20 years? Libraries: –Hooked into Big Deals –Budgets frozen –Policy made elsewhere –Varying levels of buy-in to the notion of Open Access –Preoccupation with irrelevant issues

15. What have been the drivers? Advocacy, including gathering an evidence base of the benefits Infrastructure: –Technical (repository networks) –New publishing venues Policy

16. Advocacy Benefits to authors: –Visibility, usage, impact –Part of the new modus operandi for the digital scholar Benefits to institutions: –Mission –Visibility, usage, impact –Monitoring and assessment –Competitive intelligence –Outreach, ROI –Funding Benefits to funders: –Monitoring and assessment –Return on investment

17. Infrastructure

19. Print > electronic Hyperlinking Linked open data(?) Interoperability –Work in progress –Deposit –ID –Licensing –Preservation –etc, etc

20. OA infrastructure for EU research Authors Institutional repositories OpenAIRE Readers Google, etc HARVEST

21. Open Access policies 222 institutional policies 44 sub-institutional policies 90 funder policies Europe: –H2020 Rules have a mandatory OA policy –Recommendation to Member States (2012) US: OSTP directive to federal agencies

22. Open Access policies

23. PROMISE

24. Areas of promise Policy Books (and the humanities in general) Data Institutional responsibility Author interest and activity

25. Policy Growing in number Mandatory Supported by good implementation Convergence, alignment

26. Humanities Huge increase in interest Lots of new developments –OA journals –OA monographs

28. Humanities Huge increase in interest Lots of new developments –OA journals –OA monographs Funder and institutional initiatives –Institutional publishing (university presses) –Covering costs Technical initiatives –e.g hypothes.is

29. Open Data Massive interest Funders developing policy to support Open Data implementation Lots of infrastructure already

31. Open Data Massive interest Funders developing policy to support Open Data implementation Lots of infrastructure already The basis of open scholarship in the future

32. POTHOLES

33. Recent survey of libraries Technical problems Qualitative screening of OA publications Indexing of OA publications Management of Open Access costs Long-term preservation of OA collections Promotion of Open Access resources Miriam Lorenz, IFLA WLIC, 2014 [libraries in Germany, UK, USA]

34. Issues and challenges Humanities (some areas): –esp. the future of university presses (and their relationship with libraries) Data: –Preservation and curation –Development of appropriate data management practices Licensing practices and copyright Sustaining the new system Institutional responsibility

35. Institutional responsibility I: Responsible licensing Do not sign agreements with publishers that limit OA or obstruct its aims: Govern Green OA: research results belong to the research community, not to service industries TDM

36. Institutional responsibility II: Paying for Open Access Manage your APC fund to benefit OA Encourage author responsibility Make sure you get value Don’t let the Big Deal morph into the Big OA Deal Encourage attempts to deconstruct the publishing process and pay for the component services

37. Institutional responsibility III: Sustaining the Open Access system Service infrastructure Many began as projects Sustainability plans not always robust May not be workable in the longer term First steps being taken to address this issue Libraries (and funders) have roles

38. “It is one of the noblest duties of a university to advance knowledge and to diffuse it, not merely among those who can attend the daily lectures, but far and wide.” Daniel Coit Gilman First President, Johns Hopkins University

39. Thank you almaswan3@gmail.com www.spareurope.org www.openscholarship.org www.pasteur4oa.eu