Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 An Analysis of How Instructors Use Library Collections to Support Distance Learners 15th Annual Distance Learning Services Conference – Memphis, Tennessee.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " An Analysis of How Instructors Use Library Collections to Support Distance Learners 15th Annual Distance Learning Services Conference – Memphis, Tennessee."— Presentation transcript:

1  An Analysis of How Instructors Use Library Collections to Support Distance Learners 15th Annual Distance Learning Services Conference – Memphis, Tennessee Michele Behr and Rebecca Hill April 19, 2012

2 Michele Behr  Western Michigan University  Associate Professor, Off Campus Services  269-387-5611  michele.behr@wmich.edu michele.behr@wmich.edu Rebecca Hill  Central Michigan University  Librarian, Off-Campus Library Services  989-774-6080  hill2ra@cmich.edu hill2ra@cmich.edu

3  Budget dollars and buying power are shrinking for academic libraries  Increasing pressure to make the “right” selection decisions Are the materials librarians are buying serving their intended users?

4  The number of students taking online classes continues to rise (Allen & Seaman, 2011) Are library collections effectively supporting that user population?

5  Questions:  Are the materials librarians buy serving their intended populations, and justified within reduced budgets?  As our distance learner population becomes a larger segment of our patrons are our collections effectively serving them?

6  Questions:  Are the materials librarians buy serving their intended populations, and justified within reduced budgets?  As our distance learner population becomes a larger segment of our patrons are our collections effectively serving them?  …in what ways can we try and answer these questions?

7  Faculty-chosen items or readings, mandatory or suggested as part of the curriculum, and available electronically (ALA, 2003)  These items may be a good target for determining whether library collections are being used in support of distance learners

8  Few research studies exist on faculty use of electronic reserve  General trend is to begin with instructor- authored content and move toward licensed and/or open web content  Most common types of e-reserve items to date are book sections and periodical articles  Copyright restrictions weigh heavily on what is placed on electronic reserve

9 WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE OF E-RESERVES? o Increasing or decreasing usage? o If you have an e-reserve system in place does it make it more or less attractive for online classes? o How do your institutions’ copyright policies and procedures effect faculty use of e- reserves? o What types of materials do faculty place on e-reserve?

10  To learn more about the types of materials instructors place on e-reserve by taking a closer look at two institutions  To gain insight to the usefulness of librarians’ collection choices  To inform future collection development decisions at our institutions

11 Western Michigan (WMU)  State-supported research institution  Fall 2011 enrollment of 25,000 1  ~ 2.5 million titles  $7 million, FY 2010-11 3  Major off-campus degree programs: health, education, business Central Michigan (CMU)  State-supported research institution  Fall 2011 enrollment of 28,000 2  ~ 1.3 million titles  $3.8 million, FY 2010-11 3  Major off-campus degree programs: health, education, business 1 WMU Office of Institutional Research, 2011 2 CMU Office of Institutional Research, 2011 3 American Library Directory, 2010

12 Western Michigan (WMU)  Regional sites in Michigan (7)  Long history of serving distance students  Desire2Learn  Resource Sharing Center  ARES (Atlas Systems) for e- reserves data Central Michigan (CMU)  Class centers across North America (60+)  Long history of serving distance students  Blackboard  Course Reserves & Copyright Services office  No automated system

13

14  Extracted e-reserve citations for Fall 2011 semester  Selected a randomized sample for a comparable number of citations (815 WMU; 656 CMU)  Citations analyzed and coded for format, source and (for periodical articles only) scholarly status

15 CodeDefinition BCBook chapter (or book section) from a print book EBE-Book (either section or an entire electronic book) FIFiles (usually PDF or.doc) provided by an instructor JAJournal article (i.e. periodical article) LCLaw cases available on the open web MMMultimedia RReports/Research briefs/Working papers REReference entry (encyclopedia, handbook, etc.) WSWebsites

16 CodeDefinition LCELibrary collection, electronic LCPLibrary collection, print NLNot in library collection OWOpen web

17  Each citation with a format code JA was examined for scholarly status  The citation’s publication (by title/ISSN) was checked in Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory  Refereed code – Y (yes) or N (no)

18

19  Only examined e-reserves from two libraries  Only examined e-reserves from one semester  Two different random sample sizes were needed in order to get comparable numbers

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Refereed Status taken from Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (2011)

27

28

29 Median E-Reserve Publication Dates

30  Format: 87% of total e-reserve citations examined were either periodical articles or sections from a print book  Source: 77% of total e-reserve citations examined were from library collections  Periodical Articles: 71% of total e-reserve citations examined came from scholarly publications  Median Publication Dates: For the most common types of e-reserve citations examined, no median date was more recent than 2004

31  Our collections seem to be serving our users  Items on e-reserve are primarily periodical articles and book sections, followed by instructor files  Few websites and multimedia items  Low use of e-books

32  Overall the results from the two institutions were very similar  A clear majority of periodical articles on e- reserve are from scholarly (refereed) publications  Median date shows that e-reserves are generally about ten years behind

33 WHAT DO YOU THINK? o Are e-reserve materials a good representation of what faculty are using in classes? Or are faculty bypassing the library? o What are barriers to use of e-reserves at your institution? o What other assessments could be done to see how collections are serving distance learners?

34  Look at results over time to gain more meaningful trends  Include other institutions of different sizes, types and locations  More in-depth analysis of items on e-reserve to determine collection gaps  Work with faculty to help improve currency of e-reserve materials

35  An analysis of materials placed on e-reserve is a useful lens through which to view how well our collections are serving our distance learners  E-reserve formats and sources at our institutions reflect what is reported in the literature  Our data will be used to inform future collection development decisions  As electronic formats increase in our collections, the more useful they will become for e-reserve

36  Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Babson College: Babson Survey Research Group.  American Library Association. (November 2003). Statement on fair use and electronic reserves. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/statementfair.cfm http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/statementfair.cfm  American Library Directory. (2010). Medford, NJ: Information Today.  Central Michigan University Office of Institutional Research. (2011). Fall semester enrollment statistics 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cmich.edu/documents/OIR/enrollment/fall_2011_misc_stats.pdfhttp://www.cmich.edu/documents/OIR/enrollment/fall_2011_misc_stats.pdf  Michigan Votes, Mackinac Center for Public Policy. (2012). 2011 Senate bill 178: Appropriations: 2011-2012 higher education. Retrieved from http://www.michiganvotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=133234http://www.michiganvotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=133234  Senate Fiscal Agency, State of Michigan. (2011). FY 2011-12 higher education budget (S.B. 178 (CR-1): Conference Report). Retrieved from Michigan Legislature website: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011- 2012/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2011-SFA-0178-R.pdfhttp://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011- 2012/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2011-SFA-0178-R.pdf  Western Michigan University Office of Institutional Research. (2011). Data on students enrolled fall semester 2011. Retrieved from http://www.wmich.edu/ir/reports/enrollment/dose/201140dose.pdfhttp://www.wmich.edu/ir/reports/enrollment/dose/201140dose.pdf  Woodhouse, K. (2012, March 9). Michigan set to lose $4.2M in federal higher education funding. Ann Arbor.com. Retrieved from http://www.annarbor.com/news/michigan-set-to-lose-42m-in-federal-higher-education-funding/http://www.annarbor.com/news/michigan-set-to-lose-42m-in-federal-higher-education-funding/

37 Michele Behr  Western Michigan University  Associate Professor, Off Campus Services  269-387-5611  michele.behr@wmich.edu michele.behr@wmich.edu Rebecca Hill  Central Michigan University  Librarian, Off-Campus Library Services  989-774-6080  hill2ra@cmich.edu hill2ra@cmich.edu


Download ppt " An Analysis of How Instructors Use Library Collections to Support Distance Learners 15th Annual Distance Learning Services Conference – Memphis, Tennessee."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google