Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting
5-6 June, 2014 (MGNREGA Division)

MGNREGA: Physical Achievements at a glance
FY FY FY FY FY FY Total Job Card issued (in Cr.) 10.01 11.25 11.98 12.50 12.79 13.13 Employment provided to households (in Cr.) 4.51 5.26 5.49 5.06 4.98 4.76 Employment provided to Individuals (in Cr.) 8.20 8.00 7.35 Persondays (in Cr.) Total 216.32 283.59 257.15 218.76 229.86 218.10 SCs 63.36 [29%] 86.45 [30%] 78.76 [31%] 48.47 [22%] 50.96 49.26 [23%] STs 55.02 [25%] 58.74 [21%] 53.62 40.92 [19%] 40.75 [18%] 37.22 [17%] Women [48%] 136.40 [48%] 122.74 105.27 117.93 [51%] 115.15 [53%] Others 97.95 [45%] 138.40 [49%] 124.78 129.38 [59%] 138.14 [60%] 131.18 Persondays per HH 48 days 54 days 47 days 43 days 46 days 46 days

MGNREGA: Financial Achievements at a glance
FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 TOTAL Budget Outlay (In Rs Crore) 11300 12000 30000 39100 40100 31000 30287 33000 226787 Central Release Total available fund (In Rs. Crore) Expenditure [% against available funds] [73%] [82%] [73%] [76%] [88%] [89% Expenditure on Wages [68%] [70%] [69%] [72%] [74%] Expenditure on Material [32%] [30%] [31%] [28%] [26%]

Persondays Generated (in Cr)
MGNREGA Outcome: Persondays Generated (in Cr) MGNREGA Outcome: Persondays generated (in Cr) 10

Average Persondays per HH
MGNREGA Outcome: Average Persondays per HH MGNREGA Outcome: Persondays generated (in Cr) 10

Women Persondays (%age of total persondays)
MGNREGA Outcome: Women Persondays (%age of total persondays) 60% 54% 51% 50% 48% 48% 48% 48% 40% 40% 43% Increased total women workers in the workforce (Census 2011) 30% 20% 10% 0% (estimated) 11

Average wage per personday (in Rs.)
MGNREGA Outcome: Average wage per personday (in Rs.) MGNREGA Outcome: Persondays generated (in Cr) Increased general wage levels in rural areas. Enhanced welfare effects to the poor. 10

Average wage income per HH (in Rs.)
MGNREGA Outcome: Average wage income per HH (in Rs.) MGNREGA Outcome: Persondays generated (in Cr) 10

Category-wise works taken-up
FY

works Category-wise expenditure (Rs. In Cr)
FY

MGNREGA Performance FY

Group-I: LB Vs Achievement of FY 13-14 (Persondays)

Group-II: LB Vs Achievement of FY 13-14 (Persondays)

Group-I: Women participation rate in FY 13-14 (in PDs generation)

Group-II: Women participation rate in FY 13-14
(in PDs generation)

Group-I: SC/ST Participation against registered (FY 13-14)
S.No State HHs issued jobcards (In Lakh) HHs Provided Employment (In Lakh) % of HHs Provided Employment SCs STs Total SC & ST 1 NAGALAND 0.04 3.89 3.92 3.82 3.86 100% 98% 2 ARUNACHAL Pd. 0.00 1.72 1.30 76% 3 MEGHALAYA 4.40 4.44 0.03 3.29 3.32 80% 75% 4 SIKKIM 0.32 0.37 0.24 0.27 64% 74% 73% 5 CHHATTISGARH 14.30 18.70 2.43 9.18 11.60 55% 62% 6 WEST BENGAL 32.71 9.06 41.77 19.18 5.59 24.77 59% 7 HP 3.20 0.71 3.91 1.53 1.91 48% 52% 49% 8 RAJASTHAN 18.05 17.37 35.42 7.21 8.56 15.77 40% 45% 9 AP 36.01 16.78 52.79 14.79 7.58 22.37 41% 42% 10 UTTARAKHAND 2.19 0.38 2.57 0.11 0.81 32% 28% 11 ODISHA 12.06 18.12 30.18 2.93 6.34 9.27 24% 35% 31% 12 KARNATAKA 9.59 4.68 14.27 2.35 1.09 3.44 25% 23% 13 MAHARASHTRA 7.23 10.03 17.26 1.06 2.22 15% 22% 19% 14 GOA 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.02 14% 15 BIHAR 34.17 2.23 36.41 5.74 0.43 6.16 17% National 279.01 178.08 457.10 109.40 77.50 186.90 39% 44%

Group-II: SC/ST Participation against registered (FY 13-14)
S.No State HHs issued jobcards (In Lakh) HHs Provided Employment (In Lakh) % of HHs Provided Employment SCs STs Total SC & ST 1 MANIPUR 0.10 2.35 2.45 0.08 2.29 2.38 83% 97% 2 TRIPURA 1.18 2.53 3.70 1.09 2.40 3.49 93% 95% 94% 3 MIZORAM 0.00 2.22 1.77 0% 79% 4 TAMIL NADU 26.88 1.52 28.40 18.26 0.88 19.14 68% 58% 67% 5 KERALA 3.37 0.63 3.99 2.11 0.38 2.48 63% 60% 62% 6 J & K 0.81 1.67 0.42 0.97 1.39 52% 56% 7 PUNJAB 7.99 3.19 40% 50% 8 UP 47.13 1.55 48.68 16.60 0.49 17.09 35% 32% 9 ASSAM 2.52 6.71 9.23 0.78 2.26 3.03 31% 34% 33% 10 MP 17.02 26.67 43.69 5.37 8.84 14.21 11 JHARKHAND 5.21 15.02 20.24 1.40 4.53 5.93 27% 30% 29% 12 GUJARAT 2.97 12.96 15.94 0.41 2.54 2.95 14% 20% 18% 13 HARYANA 3.91 1.56 National 279.01 178.08 457.10 109.40 77.50 186.90 39% 44% 41%

Group-I: Average Persondays per HH (FY 13-14)

Group-II: Average Persondays per HH (FY 13-14)

Unmet demand as %age of total demand (FY 13-14)

Group-I: Work Completion Rate since inception till FY 13-14
State No. of Works started No. of Works started whose estimated completion date is over Out of Coln(3) No. of Work Completed Work Completion Rate 1 2 3 4 5 UTTARAKHAND 165520 163330 138811 85 HIMACHAL PRADESH 282062 276807 215471 78 CHHATTISGARH 643206 609828 460274 75 NAGALAND 41912 41593 30505 73 WEST BENGAL 963723 ANDHRA PRADESH 69 SIKKIM 10296 10124 6925 68 ODISHA 537184 521075 339174 65 RAJASTHAN 843221 823061 524579 64 MEGHALAYA 48456 47544 29517 62 KARNATAKA 928021 57 GOA 2305 2257 1274 56 BIHAR 884215 748911 400970 54 MAHARASHTRA 597224 531432 229465 43 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5775 5619 398 7 National Total

Group-II: Work Completion Rate since inception till FY 13-14
State No. of Works started No. of Works started whose estimated completion date is over Out of Coln(3) No. of Work Completed Work Completion Rate 1 2 3 4 5 TRIPURA 425301 421624 389894 92 HARYANA 71904 69346 57147 82 KERALA 564883 523726 418564 80 GUJARAT 357443 349941 277797 79 JHARKHAND 505917 496041 372067 75 PUNJAB 55146 53245 39669 MADHYA PRADESH 74 UTTAR PRADESH MIZORAM 25557 24825 17690 71 TAMIL NADU 459295 447534 300261 67 ASSAM 151083 146540 88233 60 MANIPUR 27872 27229 13881 51 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 276680 271791 125331 46 National Total 69

Items for discussion/consultation
Discussion Paper on (1) Quality of asset (2) reducing Delay in payments and (3) preparation of District Plan. Implementation of 150 days for FRA beneficiaries. Demand Registration: Alternate provisions (IVRS, CSO, Kiosk, website) Relative performance report – ranking States/Districts/GPs based on performance. Fund flow mechanism.

Discussion Point Universalization of e-FMS [Letter: 13th May, 14] Direct Benefit Transfer under MGNREGA Drive to verify and freeze A/c information & Aadhaar number of Workers. [Letter: 6th May, 14] H. Provision of Mobile Interface (10, 000 Tablets) in case of 9 States. [Letter: 21st April, 14] I. Capacity building – DRT/BRTs J. IEC plan K. Appropriate Technologies in buildings

Items for discussion/consultation

Discussion on Quality of Assets Created under MGNREGA
Special emphasis on quality of assets in terms of their design, utility and durability. The following are suggested: Creation of durable and quality assets through convergence with other Schemes Capacity Building of RD and Panchayat Raj functionaries Community monitoring of works State Quality Monitors Completion of works Maintenance of Assets Monitoring of the Assets Impact and Quality Evaluation

Group I : Status of State Convergence Plan (SCP)
SCP submitted and approved by MoRD SCP submitted, observation sent/being examined Not submitted SCP Not conducted convergence workshop Sikkim Bihar Meghalaya Arunachal Pd. Chhattisgarh Rajasthan Nagaland HP West Bengal Goa Karnataka Uttarakhand Maharashtra Andhra Pradesh Odisha

Group II : Status of State Convergence Plan (SCP)
SCP submitted and Approved by MoRD SCP submitted, observation sent/being examined Not submitted SCP Not conducted convergence workshop Tamil Nadu Assam Punjab Gujarat Tripura Haryana Manipur Uttar Pradesh Mizoram Kerala A&N J & K MP Jharkhand Lakshadweep Puducherry

Action point for SCP Timeline for submission of SCP ( Revised and New)
Category 1 State(14 States /UTs) by 4th June : Assam, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Karnataka, Haryana, Kerala, Karnataka, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Manipur, Bihar, A&N islands, Category 2 State(7 States /UTs) by 20th June : Maharashtra, UP, Jammu and Kashmir, Gujarat, GOA, Punjab, Lakshadweep Process of approval of SCP: All states were advised that SCP should be approved by appropriate competent authority, i.e. CS /ACS , SEGC etc. After approval of competent authority, SCP should be sent to the Ministry for examination. Schedule States Workshop dates: Gujarat -17th June, Lakshadweep -1st week of July, UP 11th June and J&K in the process of finalising the date.

Discussion on Reducing Delays in Wage Payments
As per Section 3(3) of Act, “the disbursement of daily wages shall be made on a weekly basis or in any case not later than a fortnight after the date on which such work was done”. Some of the major reasons for the delay in wage payments: delay in closure of Muster Roll (MR) and its computerization Inadequate staff for taking measurement of work done Inordinate delay in measurement of work in spite of dedicated staff Excessive time taken to link MRs with the measurement book. Delayed generation of wage lists. Generation of Fund Transfer Orders (FTOs)and their uploading where e-FMS has been made operational. Poor network coverage of banks and post offices. Measures to address delay in wage payment Cash Payments: Identify blocks on criteria of low or nil internet connectivity and non-existence of banks/Post Offices for cash payment. Trained Mates for measurement of work: Deployment of Barefoot Engineers: Suitable persons from the families of workers or one of the best performing workers from the local community may be identified. Monthly review by SRD: Monthly review on the delays in wage payments.

Delay Compensation system (DCS)
DCS: MGNREGA workers are entitled to receive delay compensation at a rate of 0.05% of the unpaid wages per day for the duration of the delay beyond the sixteenth day of the closure of the MR. Formulae for calculation in NREGASoft is : No. of Days delayed = {Date of payment – Date of Closure of Muster Roll(end date of MR)}- 15 Delay compensation = {No. of Days delayed * Total Cash paid for the beneficiary * 0.05}/100 State DBAs are required to make an entry of the following in the MIS:- Different sub process involved in making the payments, Fix & map the responsibility of each sub process with MGNREGA officials and Number of days to complete the sub processes. Payment in DSC: PO is required to either (a) Approve, or disapprove with reasons or (b) Generate Pay Order.

Group-I: Delayed Payment Compensation (FY 13-14)
State Payable PDs Payable Amount [In Lakh Rs.] Approved (In Delay Days) Rejected (In Delay Days) Compensation Paid [In Lakh Rs.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 ANDHRA PRADESH ARUNACHAL PRADESH 112.08 BIHAR CHHATTISGARH 632873 GOA 55099 0.66 HIMACHAL PRADESH 241.97 KARNATAKA MAHARASHTRA 961.57 66 14.31 MEGHALAYA 474.16 NAGALAND 394.51 ODISHA 580.17 RAJASTHAN SIKKIM 42.18 UTTARAKHAND 364.33 WEST BENGAL National

Group-II: Delayed Payment Compensation (FY 13-14)
State Payable PDs Payable Amount [In Lakh Rs.] Approved (In Delay Days) Rejected (In Delay Days) Compensation Paid [In Lakh Rs.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 ASSAM 133.60 GUJARAT 280.83 HARYANA 105.87 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 705.62 JHARKHAND 23.55 KERALA MADHYA PRADESH 47 MANIPUR 111.39 MIZORAM 880 0.01 PUNJAB 309.95 TAMIL NADU 785.29 298512 TRIPURA 34.41 UTTAR PRADESH 920.66 National 14.31

Discussion on Preparation of District Plan under MGNREGA
MGNREGA works to emerge from an integrated plan for local development with focus on (a) Natural Resource Management especially on a micro watershed basis and, (b) agriculture and allied activities. For this purpose, a District Plan under MGNREGA (DPM) for period of 5 years should be developed. The Labour Budget will be derived from the DPM itself. The following steps are suggested for preparation of the DPM: Environment Creation and Awareness Building Identification of needs at the Gram Panchayat level Identification of Technical and Financial Resource Envelope Preparation of Draft Plans Approval of Gram Sabha Plan Consolidation

DEMAND REGISTRATION: ALTERNATE PROVISIONS FOR WORKERS
As per the amendment in Schedule 2 Application for work can be oral or written and made either through the Ward member/GP/ PO/any person authorized by the State Govt. or using the following ICT tools: IVRS System (Telephone / Mobile) Call Centre / Helpline Internet using any of the following mechanism enabled under MGNREGA MIS Kiosk (call center login): States may use the new/ existing call centers to register demand of workers. Using this Individual demand can be registered. The call center login and password has been shared with States. CSO login: CSOs may be registered themselves after which they can register the individual or group demand. Before registering group demand CSOs are required to create groups for which demand is to be registered. Worker module: Worker may use this provision of NREGASoft to register his/her demand. Worker needs to enter the job card number for registering the demand. Worker may also access the details of his/ her employment and entitlement under the scheme.

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE FOR RANKING
Enable states to analyze the performance of their districts, Blocks and GPs for taking the corrective measures. In addition to this, relative performance among states can also be done to know the performance across country. Relative performance based on following indicators : % of PersonDays Generated against last year performance Average days per HH % of HHs Completed 100 days % of Work with Convergence Work Completion Rate % of SC/ST HH provided employment against registered SC/ST % of wage paid with-in 15 days The reports have been categorized in the following four:- State wise Relative Performance: District wise Relative Performance: All MGNREGA Districts Block wise Relative Performance: Top/ Bottom 50 Gram Panchayat wise Relative Performance: Top/ Bottom 100 Details of these reports & method to access is shared through a detailed note circulated

Status of e-FMS implementation
S.No. State Total Blocks Blocks where e-FMS started (as on 30/01/14) Blocks where eFMS started (as on 28/5/14) New Blocks added since 30/01/14 under eFMS %age of Blocks where eFMS started 1 HARYANA 125 105 20 100 2 KERALA 152 3 KARNATAKA 176 4 TAMIL NADU 385 212 173 5 MP 313 6 ODISHA 314 7 AP 1098 8 RAJASTHAN 249 242 248 9 GUJARAT 223 213 222 10 JHARKHAND 260 89 258 169 99 11 UTTAR PRADESH 823 324 814 490 12 MAHARASHTRA 354 306 348 42 98 13 PUNJAB 151 142 146 97 14 CHHATTISGARH 113 139 26 95 15 HP 78 51 72 21 92 16 ASSAM 238 180 160 76 17 PUDUCHERRY 75 18 TRIPURA 58 27 47 19 WEST BENGAL 341 50 33 UTTARAKHAND BIHAR 534 National Total 6611 3916 5085 1168 77

e-FMS Plan of Action for extending to non e-FMS areas
MoRD shared the block wise action plan letter dated 13th May, 14 Status of connectivity Number of Blocks % Action plan Blocks having Broadband 4,322 65% Continue in implementation level and implement all modules No broadband, but there are CSCs with broadband 1, 906 29% Allow data entry through CSCs and bring them under the eFMS from August 2014. No broadband, no CSC 261 4% Request DEITY to set up VSAT (we share the costs of the equipment and DEITY provides the satellite bandwidth). Can be brought under eFMS from October 2014. Not participated in survey 112 2% 06 block where there was no expenditure. 49 blocks where FTO generated but e-FMS not implemented. 11 block where expenditure was through line dept. Total Blocks 6,601 100%

e-FMS Plan of Action for extending to non eFMS areas with Connectivity issues
State were requested to share their comments/ observations by 30th May, 2014 on Details / status of connectivity in non – eFMS blocks Functioning of the CSCs in the blocks which have otherwise no broadband connectivity. Only States which have shared comment are :- Haryana, Kerala, Meghalaya, Sikkim and A&NB Remaining States may send the information by 10th June, 2014

Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) under MGNREGA
All States to implement e-FMS and/or make a transition from NEFT/RTGS e-payments to Aadhaar enabled payments (Aadhaar Based Payments System- APB). S STEPS : AADHAAR ENABLED PAYMENTS 1 Drive to open Bank/ Post office Account of the workers and Verification & freezing information of accounts in bank and post offices in MIS 2 Expedite Aadhaar enrolment and Aadhaar Seeding and its verification & freezing by PO/MoRD (AUA/ASA – Authentication agency) 3 Aadhaar seeding in Banks/ PO followed by its mapping in the NPCI mapper 4 Readiness of the Banks and State/MoRD 5 Simultaneously , follow up with Banks/ PO to place BCs ( AEPS enabled micro ATMs) CURRENT STATUS 9.76 Cr. Bank & PO Accounts 9.76 Cr accounts are of 12.4 Crore workers. Out of 12.4 Cr, 8.6 Cr (69%) a/c information of workers frozen. 1.89 Cr Aadhaar seeded in MIS ; 1 Cr Aadhaar sent for demo-auth. 30% verified & frozen by MoRD ; Remaining 70% to be verified and frozen by PO

Group-I: A/c information Freezing of Active Workers
S.No States Active worker with Account Information (In Lakhs) Total %age Frozen Bank Post Office Commercial and RRB's Cooperative and others 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KARNATAKA 58.19 0.01 1.42 59.62 95% 0% 93% ANDHRA PRADESH 35.21 0.00 68.02 103.23 75% 99% 91% 3 HIMACHAL PRADESH 3.70 3.36 0.33 7.39 92% 47% 90% 4 RAJASTHAN 11.39 30.28 25.29 66.97 82% 89% CHHATTISGARH 19.05 3.60 34.38 57.03 64% 87% GOA 0.07 0.02 0.09 83% UTTARAKHAND 3.22 1.01 1.54 5.77 46% 79% ODISHA 25.19 0.30 10.49 35.98 40% 73% BIHAR 10.54 0.26 22.31 33.10 5% 43% 54% WEST BENGAL 47.31 5.99 51.41 104.71 15% 32% 51% MAHARASHTRA 13.71 3.99 15.65 33.35 70% 31% 48% SIKKIM 0.32 0.29 0.91 78% 33% 7% 13 MEGHALAYA 0.04 0.44 0.77 14% 1% 6% 9% 14 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0.35 0.20 0.22 13% 15 NAGALAND National Total 498.72 65.87 294.61 859.21 62% 68% 76%

Group-II: Status of Account information Freezing of Active Workers
S.No States Active worker with Account Information (In Lakhs) Total %age Frozen Bank Post Office Commercial and RRB's Cooperative and others 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 TAMIL NADU 78.66 0.01 0.00 78.67 92% 0% 8% 17 KERALA 16.40 1.43 1.35 19.18 96% 6% 90% 89% 18 PUNJAB 5.23 0.21 0.39 5.83 51% 45% 88% 19 MADHYA PRADESH 54.04 7.27 18.54 79.85 67% 84% 87% 20 HARYANA 5.17 1.32 0.33 6.82 94% 46% 77% 21 JHARKHAND 4.40 0.43 19.77 24.60 20% 78% 79% 22 UTTAR PRADESH 69.18 0.96 2.17 72.31 74% 36% 1% 71% 23 GUJARAT 6.93 0.13 8.97 16.03 54% 56% 70% 24 ASSAM 11.11 0.34 7.91 19.36 69% 44% 42% 57% 25 TRIPURA 7.45 3.03 1.38 11.86 32% 29% 28% 26 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 9.69 1.27 0.19 11.14 16% 14% 27 MANIPUR 0.09 0.89 2.26 10% 5% 28 MIZORAM 0.11 0.02 0.90 1.03 National Total 498.72 65.87 294.61 859.21 83% 62% 68% 76%

Group-I: Status of Aadhaar seeding
S.No. States Registered Workers Active Workers Total With Aadhaar No. % With Aadhaar No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 861865 596676 69% SIKKIM 173454 74285 94949 59130 62% ANDHRA PRADESH 54% GOA 44236 4099 8621 1955 23% MAHARASHTRA 980559 530078 13% RAJASTHAN 904045 579824 8% KARNATAKA 872542 441702 7% 8 CHHATTISGARH 55429 45426 1% 9 UTTARAKHAND 3246 671222 1879 0% 10 WEST BENGAL 23734 19346 11 ODISHA 6661 3972 12 BIHAR 38 13 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 441329 169546 14 MEGHALAYA 582883 15 NAGALAND 697105 463263 National Total 14%

Group-II: Status of Aadhaar seeding
S.No. States Registered Workers Active Workers Total With Aadhaar No. % With Aadhaar No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 KERALA 75% 17 PUNJAB 464655 623707 276521 44% 18 JHARKHAND 39% 19 TRIPURA 463124 442157 37% 20 HARYANA 197766 720734 136612 19% 21 TAMIL NADU 9% 22 MADHYA PRADESH 428894 274151 3% 23 GUJARAT 35804 24392 1% 24 MANIPUR 2998 585531 2434 0% 25 UTTAR PRADESH 31325 25254 26 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 27 ASSAM 28 MIZORAM 514911 219045 National Total 14%

Provision given in PO Login
S No. State No. of Aadhars sent to PO for verification PO Verification Status Verified Rejected 1 ASSAM 21 2 BIHAR 38 3 CHHATTISGARH 42375 4 GOA 2579 5 GUJARAT 31174 6 HARYANA 107306 7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 535755 23 8 JHARKHAND 45 9 KERALA 43 10 MADHYA PRADESH 363501 157 11 MAHARASHTRA 655538 12 MANIPUR 2809 13 ODISHA 3713 14 PUNJAB 183729 15 RAJASTHAN 667136 16 SIKKIM 40983 17 TAMIL NADU 969681 18 TRIPURA 248024 19 UTTAR PRADESH 19937 20 UTTARAKHAND 2055 WEST BENGAL 11561 22 PUDUCHERRY 50729 Total 295 VERIFICATION OF AADHAAR BY PO In case if the demo-auth fails, PO are requested to verify the aadhaar numbers of the workers. Provision given in PO Login States have been requested to expedite the process.

Provision Of Mobile Interface
S.No States Amount Released 1st Instalment (In Rs lakh) Total number of Tablets 1 Bihar 32.05 641 2 Andhra Pradesh 181.61 3632 3 Maharastra 88.72 1774 4 Himachal Pradesh 28.34 567 5 Madhya Pradesh 53.78 1076 6 Rajasthan 12.15 243 7 Sikkim 8.80 176 8 Jharkhand 66.10 1322 9 Chhattisgarh 28.45 569 TOTAL 500.00 10000 State are requested to share the status of the procurement process and methodology adopted

Calendar for Meeting with State Nodal Officers
Meeting at MORD Video Conferencing State Nodal Officers for Convergence 30th June 2014 30th July 2014 27th August2014 26th September 2014 State Nodal Officer for IEC 1st July 2014 28th August 2014 26th September2014

Group-I: DRTs and BRTs States that have conducted training for DRTs
States that have conducted training for BRTs: 1. Chhattisgarh 2. Goa 3. Rajasthan 4. Sikkim 5. Nagaland 1. Goa 2. Sikkim 3. Nagaland Maharashtra has conducted only one day training for DRTs. Maharashtra has conducted training for BRTs in only 10 districts out of 33 districts.

Group-II: DRTs and BRTs
States that have conducted training for DRTs States that have conducted training for BRTs: Gujarat Jammu & Kashmir Kerala Jharkhand 1. Jammu & Kashmir Haryana has conducted only one day training for DRTs. Manipur has conducted only one training for DRTs . Madhya Pradesh, training on MIS issues for District and Block level functionaries is under progress (12 May to 10 June, 2014)

DRTs and BRTs Assam Madhya Pradesh Mizoram Punjab Tripura Tamil Nadu
States that have not conducted training for DRTs States that have not conducted training for BRTs: Assam Madhya Pradesh Mizoram Punjab Tripura Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Gujarat Haryana Jharkhand Kerala Manipur

Contd. Training for DRTs and BRTs to be completed by 30th June, 2014.
States to provide following details: Indicate training dates for DRTs and BRTs (last date was 3rd June, 2014, MoRD letter dated ). Submit detailed training report along with photographs (if training has already been conducted). Roadmap for the training of MGNREGA functionaries

IEC Activities

IEC Activities ‘Rozgar Divas’ being integrated into the IEC Strategy of MGNREGA to dovetail with grassroot level IEC activities Some States requested to re-submit their IEC Action Plan for FY incorporating the programme plan for Rozgar Divas

Approved IEC Plans (as on 27th May 2014)
Tripura Manipur West Bengal Chhattisgarh Sikkim Odisha Approved plans are available on the website of MGNREGA

States those submitted IEC plans integrating Rozgar Divas
States those submitted IEC plans integrating Rozgar Divas. These are being examined by the MoRD MP Mizoram A&NB Rajasthan Andhra Pradesh UP Assam Maharashtra Bihar Punjab Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Lakshadweep Karnataka Meghalaya Tamil Nadu MP Jharkhand Uttrakhand

STATUS OF SUBMISSION OF IEC PLAN
NOT SUBMITTED ANY IEC PLAN Goa Aru. Pradesh Nagaland States those have not submitted the IEC plans integrating ‘Rozgar Divas’ and the inputs given by the Ministry J&K Kerala Haryana

IEC: Contribution towards upcoming publications
States may share good quality photographs of sustainable assets. This is for the upcoming compilation of photographs of sustainable assets created under MGNREGA across the country. States may share news items/success stories for the upcoming quarterly Newsletter on MGNREGA

IEC: Good initiatives Maharashtra constituting a Social Communication Unit for focusing on IEC activities. Communication professionals are being recruited. Karnataka inviting EoI from creative agencies to develop IEC materials on various key messages of MGNREGA

APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES IN CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS UNDER MGNREGA & IAY OBJECTIVES & ROAD MAP

(Low cost is not low quality)
SCHEDULE -1, MGNREGA Para 13(a), that “ For all works involving construction, cost effective, labour intensive technologies and usage of local materials shall be employed as far as possible.” (Low cost is not low quality)

DIFFERENT TYPE OF BUILDINGS PERMITTED UNDER MGNREGA
1) Gram Panchayat (covered area-130 sq. m.) 2) Anganwadi centres (covered area at least -600 sq.ft.) 3) Food Grain Storage Structures 4) Village Haats 5) Crematoria

DIFFERENT TYPE OF BUILDINGS PERMITTED UNDER MGNREGA
6) Women self-help groups’ federation 7) Cyclone shelter 8) Common work-sheds for livelihood activities of self-help groups 9) Post harvest facilities including pucca storage facilities for agricultural produce 10) houses sanctioned under the IAY ( minimum built up area at least 20 sq.m.)

SUITABLE BUILDING MATERIAL WHICH CAN BE USED
Produced at the site of construction (using the MGNREGA workers) labour component in the building closer to 40% of the total cost utilisation of the local conventional materials, such as: Mud blocks Stone and renewable wood (e.g. casuarina) Compressed and stabilised earth blocks (after due treatment and curing)

SUITABLE BUILDING MATERIAL WHICH CAN BE USED
Bamboo Fal-G bricks using the fly ash Filler blocks Ferro-cement roofing channels RCC door & window frame Micro Concrete wall & floor tiles Ferro –cement Girders & wall panels, etc.

APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES FOR BUILDINGS
Stub foundations or arch foundations or under reamed piles, with suitable design and specifications to address the needs of the relevant seismic zone. Avoiding the use of columns and beams wherever the span of construction is less than 4 meters and where the soils permit by using alternate appropriate technologies. Use of rat-trap bond in all walling work using bricks or blocks 250 mm X 120 mm X 85 mm or equivalent sizes as locally adopted. Avoiding cement plastering to the extent possible on both sides of the wall.

APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES FOR BUILDING
Use of filler slabs using tiles or local material to reduce the concrete. Avoiding RCC sunshades (chajjas) and replacing with stone/ferro-cement or suitable materials locally available. Replace windows with honeycomb structures wherever local climate permits. Use of local material like stone or precast units etc. for door and window frames and minimise the use of wood. Use of local material like stone, bricks etc. for flooring. Use of appropriate mud- based technologies, etc.

EFFORTS MADE SO FAR FOR THE USE OF APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES
National Workshop held at Thrissur (Kerala) in which 21 States participated 5 Regional workshop on the subject held at Wardha, Delhi, Imphal, Chennai and Bhuj.

OUTCOME FROM THESE WORKSHOPS
The State groups, with the guidance of Mentors has finalised and made presentation on: designs for model building under MGNREGA using appropriate construction technologies for various regions in the State including the: 1) methodology for producing/sourcing local building material locally, 2) design, 3) bill of quantities, 4) estimate as per SoR and 5) action plan for training and capacity building 6) Proposal for starting the Centre for Appropriate Technology (CAT) for the State.

States (with the assistance of NIRD)
FOLLOW UP States (with the assistance of NIRD) Approve and communicate their proposal/design on all the 6 issues and type of model building by 15th June, 2014 Construct at least one model building in any area incorporating the above appropriate technologies. The proposed location of model building has been decided by the State Groups. State has to approve the location and communicate to the Ministry before 10th June 2014. To be used as training centre. Approve the list of suitable/ available building material to be produced on work site under MGNREGA, by 10th June, 2014 so that production can begin by July 2014.

Payment of Unemployment Allowance
Non payment of UA is a violation of provision of the Act UA is automatically calculated by NREGASoft PO can approve/ reject UA for recorded reasons Incorrect rejections would call for action States not yet formulated UA rules should notify before July 2014

Group-I: Unemployment Allowances due (FY 13-14)
State Payable Days Payable Amount (In Lakhs) Approved (In Days) Rejected (In Days) 1 2 3 4 5 ANDHRA PRADESH * ARUNACHAL PRADESH 735.87 BIHAR 24 222 CHHATTISGARH 367658 268.39 306 GOA 1114 0.99 HIMACHAL PRADESH 136057 106.51 KARNATAKA MAHARASHTRA 204613 165.74 18 MEGHALAYA 662196 480.09 NAGALAND 849.36 ODISHA 300780 215.06 RAJASTHAN SIKKIM 62833 42.41 UTTARAKHAND 139626 99.13 WEST BENGAL 862238 650.99 National 242 87720 * AP: Approved:- Rs Lakh, Rejected:- Rs Lakh

Group-II: Unemployment Allowances due (FY 13-14)
State Payable Days Payable Amount (In Lakhs) Approved (In Days) Rejected (In Days) 1 2 3 4 5 ASSAM 188952 143.60 142 10 GUJARAT 299868 220.40 78969 HARYANA 3761 4.02 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 852.85 JHARKHAND 293047 202.20 354 KERALA 257930 232.14 MADHYA PRADESH 547032 399.33 MANIPUR 77771 59.49 MIZORAM 428042 316.75 PUNJAB 110910 102.04 TAMIL NADU 58 7859 TRIPURA 34510 23.29 UTTAR PRADESH 556320 394.99 National 242 87720 * AP: Approved:- Rs Lakh, Rejected:- Rs Lakh

Unemployment Allowance Rules –Status
Notified Not Notified Andhra Pradesh Assam Maharashtra Arunachal Pradesh Sikkim GOA West Bengal Haryana Karnataka Himachal Pradesh Tripura Jharkhand Chhattisgarh Kerala Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Manipur Odisha Meghalaya Rajasthan Mizoram Punjab Tamil Nadu Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand Nagaland Jammu and Kashmir

Thanks

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback