Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting
13-14 Jan, 2015 (MGNREGA Division)

IPPE: Identification of Blocks and Training of Planning Teams
2457 Blocks identified against proposed 2500 Blocks. About 100,000 Gram Panchayats under the IPPE in these blocks Training of State Level Resource Persons 9 different locations An estimated 250,000 rural youth have been trained

State of Completion grassroots work on IPPE
Other States reporting Significant Completion All selected IPPE Blocks Arunachal Pradesh Tamil Nadu (88 out of the 98 identified blocks) Bihar Chhattisgarh Odisha (81 out of the 180 identified blocks) Madhya Pradesh Manipur Others in various stages of completion. Meghalaya Mizoram Maharashtra to complete by 15th January, Gujarat by and Tripura by 31st of January. Sikkim West Bengal

State of Data Entry As on 11th January, data entry process has started in 911 of the identified IPPE Blocks. Data entry has started in 21,516 Gram Panchayats out of the 92,176 Gram Panchayats marked as covered under IPPE Some states have reported that Data Entry would be completed by 15th of January. West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Manipur, Sikkim Most other states have reported that ata Entry would be completed by 31st of Janaury Tripura (7th Feb), Gujarat (15th Feb) and Tamil Nadu (15th Feb) are the only states that have sought time in to February.

States with highest percentage of Blocks having started Data Entry
Number of IPPE Blocks Identified Number of Blocks started Data Entry % of Blocks started Data Entry 1 KERALA 22 100% 2 TAMIL NADU 98 96 98% 3 WEST BENGAL 124 111 90% 4 MIZORAM 15 12 80% 5 SIKKIM 6 RAJASTHAN 64 50 78% 7 CHHATTISGARH 105 78 74% 8 UTTARAKHAND 18 13 72% 9 UTTAR PRADESH 403 257 64% 10 HARYANA 23 14 61%

States with highest percentage of Gram Panchayats having started Data Entry
Number of IPPE Gram Panchayats Identified Number of Gram Panchayats started Data Entry % of Gram Panchayats started Data Entry 1 KERALA 146 136 93% 2 SIKKIM 35 26 74% 3 WEST BENGAL 1187 861 73% 4 MIZORAM 515 329 64% 5 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 813 461 57% 6 CHHATTISGARH 7126 3597 50% 7 TAMIL NADU 3230 1459 45% 8 RAJASTHAN 2473 1109 9 HARYANA 1048 442 42% 10 UTTAR PRADESH 26066 10906

Group-I: Status of LB Data entry in IPPE Blocks
State No. of IPPE Blocks No. of IPPE Blocks mapped by the State No. of Blocks Started entry No. of Panchayats in declared blocks No. of Panchayats Started Entry Demand Projection New works ARUNACHAL PRADESH 61 60 28 16 813 283 102 BIHAR 293 53 9 4699 182 26 CHHATTISGARH 105 76 15 7126 3374 232 GOA 1 HIMACHAL PRADESH 11 2 425 7 KERALA 22 5 146 136 MAHARASHTRA 138 134 10850 191 MEGHALAYA 8 416 NAGALAND 24 389 96 ODISHA 180 21 3174 64 RAJASTHAN 37 2473 713 85 SIKKIM 4 35 23 UTTARAKHAND 18 12 3 1636 487 40 WEST BENGAL 124 107 19 1187 798 95 National Total 2500 2327 783 155 92177 18220 2021 - LB meetings will be held on Feb, 2015 for States where data entry will be completed by then

Group-I: Status of Data entered in IPPE Blocks (PDs in Lakhs)
States Demand Side Supply Side (Works) Estimated Demand (PDs) by vulnerable Jobcard Holders Estimated Demand (PDs) from other HHs Total demand (PDs) PDs can be generated from Ongoing Works* Estimated PDs from new works Total PDs From Agri. related works From other works ARUNACHAL PRADESH 38.25 0.10 38.35 9.33 5.81 BIHAR 21.59 5.78 27.37 0.23 1.91 CHHATTISGARH 315.81 108.37 424.19 10.90 1.77 GOA 0.00 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.55 0.02 0.56 KERALA 172.33 22.25 194.58 0.04 MAHARASHTRA 3.26 8.75 12.01 MEGHALAYA 0.01 NAGALAND 28.96 0.03 28.99 ODISHA 6.75 1.22 7.98 0.69 0.66 RAJASTHAN 102.23 110.16 212.39 1.23 1.08 SIKKIM 4.84 3.93 8.78 347.71 UTTARAKHAND 19.14 3.50 22.63 0.34 1.95 WEST BENGAL 515.40 139.33 654.73 53.95 26.09 National Total 642.84 143.18 63.10 *States are requested to correct the estimated PDs in ongoing works

Group-II: Status of LB Data entry in IPPE Blocks
State No. of IPPE Blocks No. of IPPE Blocks declared by the State No. of Blocks Started entry No. of Panchayats in declared blocks No. of Panchayats Started Entry Demand Projection New works ANDHRA PRADESH 116 2541 ASSAM 130 GUJARAT 77 42 4 1 2538 5 HARYANA 23 13 2 1048 439 10 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 27 11 791 39 JHARKHAND 171 2503 8 KARNATAKA 69 9 2220 207 6 MADHYA PRADESH 180 12231 MANIPUR 26 15 2131 516 105 MIZORAM 12 515 319 18 PUNJAB 1301 93 TAMIL NADU 98 84 7 3230 909 TELANGANA 78 76 1430 TRIPURA 3 262 UTTAR PRADESH 403 224 45 26067 9327 1274 National Total 2500 2327 783 155 92177 18220 2021 - LB meetings will be held on Feb, 2015 for States where data entry will be completed by then

Group-II: Status of Data entered in IPPE Blocks (PDs in Lakhs)
States Demand Side Supply Side (Works) Estimated Demand (PDs) by vulnerable Jobcard Holders Estimated Demand (PDs) from other HHs Total demand (PDs) PDs can be generated from Ongoing Works Estimated PDs from new works Total PDs From Agriculture related works From other works ANDHRA PRADESH 0.00 ASSAM GUJARAT 0.39 HARYANA 4.45 4.06 8.51 0.90 1.20 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 7.38 0.95 8.33 JHARKHAND 0.41 0.10 0.51 KARNATAKA 64.01 4.10 68.11 1.96 0.15 MADHYA PRADESH 0.13 MANIPUR 57.46 18.05 75.51 45.57 15.19 MIZORAM 54.78 0.01 54.79 2.11 0.18 PUNJAB 1.54 2.05 TAMIL NADU 266.71 59.35 326.06 1.36 2.56 TELANGANA TRIPURA UTTAR PRADESH 293.47 152.25 445.72 14.57 4.56 National Total 642.84 143.18 63.10 *States are requested to correct the estimated PDs in ongoing works

Impact on Demand Estimation and Planning
Demand: Some enhancement in the demand for employment compared to Labour Budget for Works: Data Entry is slower for Works. About 70% of all works are agriculture related works. This is much higher than the proposed minimum of 60% of all works. Higher participation in the planning processes. Barefoot Engineers can further enhance planning and estimation of works.

Labour Budget 2015-16 Examination of LB will be done by Secy RD
Pre-requisites for calling for LB discussion: Completion of IPPE exercise as per guidelines Completion of data entry of IPPE /Non-IPPE areas Matching of demand-supply (works) – Report 20.2 Compliance to the 60% works in agriculture Detailed steps for operationalising convergence

Group-I: Performance against agreed to LB (%age of PDs generated against LB upto Dec, 14)

Group-II: Performance against agreed to LB (%age of PDs generated against LB upto Dec, 14)

Group-I: Performance against Previous Year (PDs generated in lakhs)
State upto Dec, 13 upto Dec, 14 %age Change ARUNACHAL PRADESH 32.9 6.7 -79.58 BIHAR 596.0 329.1 -44.78 CHHATTISGARH 738.7 551.1 -25.40 GOA 0.7 1.4 98.55 HIMACHAL PRADESH 190.6 135.0 -29.21 KERALA 592.1 315.3 -46.74 MAHARASHTRA 356.6 411.5 15.41 MEGHALAYA 173.5 59.8 -65.54 NAGALAND 142.1 49.9 -64.86 ODISHA 427.8 368.6 -13.84 RAJASTHAN 1216.8 1360.9 11.84 SIKKIM 26.6 15.4 -41.95 UTTARAKHAND 126.0 52.6 -58.26 WEST BENGAL 987.1 1214.7 23.06 NATIONAL -16.41 -States are requested to share the reasons of decline in employment generation

Group-II: Performance against Previous Year (PDs generated in lakhs)
State upto Dec, 13 upto Dec, 14 %age Change ANDHRA PRADESH 1390.5 1276.2 -8.22 ASSAM 196.8 145.9 -25.84 GUJARAT 149.1 139.2 -6.58 HARYANA 82.9 46.6 -43.76 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 206.2 40.8 -80.23 JHARKHAND 313.8 313.3 -0.17 KARNATAKA 416.1 298.2 -28.34 MADHYA PRADESH 555.2 1106.6 99.31 MANIPUR 89.0 78.0 -12.34 MIZORAM 83.5 24.6 -70.53 PUNJAB 71.6 50.8 -28.96 TAMIL NADU 2952.8 2124.3 -28.06 TELANGANA 884.4 838.5 -5.19 TRIPURA 319.9 217.8 -31.92 UTTAR PRADESH 1442.6 771.9 -46.49 NATIONAL -16.41 -States are requested to share the reasons of decline in employment generation

Group-I: Delayed Payment (FY 14-15 & 13-14) (% of wages paid after 15 days of closure of MR)

% Delay in payment of wages
Group-I: Delayed Payment (FY 14-15) (period wise % of payment of wages) State with in 15 days % Delay in payment of wages 15 to 30 days 30 to 60 days 60 to 90 days more than 90 days ARUNACHAL PRADESH 50.55 17.30 17.00 10.04 5.11 BIHAR 28.40 14.79 21.05 14.65 21.11 CHHATTISGARH 29.81 15.45 17.69 13.53 23.52 GOA 42.30 43.85 10.81 2.92 0.11 HIMACHAL PRADESH 23.57 29.38 31.43 11.54 4.08 KERALA 16.47 22.99 37.37 17.93 5.24 MAHARASHTRA 22.43 31.48 27.86 11.25 6.98 MEGHALAYA 23.55 26.00 11.06 15.82 NAGALAND 30.88 9.98 25.45 26.51 7.19 ODISHA 24.72 29.72 26.15 9.80 9.60 RAJASTHAN 38.91 42.80 15.94 2.06 0.30 SIKKIM 44.69 11.01 17.36 14.73 12.21 UTTARAKHAND 74.74 8.55 3.50 3.62 WEST BENGAL 8.26 12.26 22.67 24.11 32.70 NATIONAL 28.22 27.91 24.44 10.49 8.94

Group-II: Delayed Payment (FY 14-15 & 13-14) (% of wages paid after 15 days of closure of MR)

% Delay in payment of wages
Group-II: Delayed Payment (FY 14-15) (period wise % of payment of wages) State with in 15 days % Delay in payment of wages 15 to 30 days 30 to 60 days 60 to 90 days more than 90 days ANDHRA PRADESH 30.29 44.73 22.69 1.44 0.85 ASSAM 36.49 20.20 25.57 11.68 6.06 GUJARAT 48.06 26.80 16.76 5.24 3.15 HARYANA 16.92 19.45 31.63 19.72 12.29 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 22.61 11.53 18.65 14.01 33.20 JHARKHAND 68.11 18.79 9.55 2.73 0.83 KARNATAKA 13.79 16.65 24.79 17.36 27.42 MADHYA PRADESH 18.20 28.04 31.53 13.29 8.94 MANIPUR 91.70 7.85 0.34 0.08 0.04 MIZORAM 97.00 3.00 0.01 0.00 PUNJAB 8.22 3.21 9.00 10.50 69.07 TAMIL NADU 28.54 29.64 29.49 9.89 2.45 TELANGANA 21.35 44.40 28.52 3.50 2.23 TRIPURA 84.00 10.37 4.05 1.25 UTTAR PRADESH 19.80 22.40 27.73 17.40 12.66 NATIONAL 28.22 27.91 24.44 10.49

Group-I: Agriculture related works (FY 2014-15)

Group-II: Agriculture related works (FY 2014-15)

Rural Sanitation IHHLs continue in MGNREGA as stand-alone:
Segregation of GPs between SBM-R and MGNREGS (to be done by District Collectors) Rs. 12,000 per IHHL Water provision mandatory Identified GPs to become ODF Plans to be prepared before 31st March

Number convergence partner Ministries /Dept
State Name Number convergence partner Ministries /Dept Contribution from MGNREGA(In Rs cr) Contribution from Line Dept(In Rs cr) Total Project Cost % contribution from line dept ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR 11 12.2 0.56 12.8 4.38 CHHATTISGARH 13 595 381 976 39 GUJARAT 282 507 789 64.3 HARYANA 14 125 74.6 200 37.4 HIMACHAL PRADESH 8 85.8 123 209 59 KARNATAKA 10 807 452 1259 35.9 MADHYA PRADESH 7 8965 1564 10529 14.9 MAHARASHTRA 308 1130 1438 78.6 MANIPUR 2 2.96 9.6 12.6 76.4 MEGHALAYA 9 56.6 126 182 68.9 MIZORAM 4 56.8 25.5 82.3 31 ODISHA 941 225 1166 19.3 RAJASTHAN 408 340 748 45.4 SIKKIM 3 33.2 68.2 101 67.2 TAMIL NADU 1321 444 1765 25.2 TRIPURA 227 567 40 UTTARAKHAND 19 65 37 102 36.3 WEST BENGAL 6 1315 2844 4159 68.4 UTTAR PRADESH 601.45 20.41 BIHAR 15 35.22 JHARKHAND 12 346.14 423.63 779.95 54.32 Total - 34.39

Percentage of works under convergence(FY:14-15)

Exp on convergence for major works sanctioned in 2014-15
Category Total Expenditure Exp. Cov works % Rural Connectivity 10.8 Renovation of traditional water bodies 1.02 Water Conservation and Water Harvesting 699.78 0.66 Land Development 2.51 Category IV 1.55 Micro Irrigation Works 1.63 5

Convergence: Category-wise works Approved in FY 2014-15
SNo. Category No. of Approved Works Total Works Works with Convergence % of Works with Convergence 1 Anganwadi 3604 343 9.52 2 Coastal Areas 233 6 2.58 3 Drought Proofing 178302 8599 4.82 4 Rural Drinking Water 2590 13 0.5 5 Food Grain 185 30 16.22 Flood Control and Protection 68381 321 0.47 7 Fisheries 3689 131 3.55 8 Micro Irrigation Works 269145 1302 0.48 9 Works on Individuals Land (Category IV) 457521 43331 9.47 10 Land Development 205528 4267 2.08 11 Other Works 74624 1168 1.57 12 Play Ground 1545 0.58 Rural Connectivity 353624 20673 5.85 14 Rural Sanitation 344264 16.31 15 Bharat Nirman Rajeev Gandhi Sewa Kendra 3622 18 16 Water Conservation and Water Harvesting 162982 1194 0.73 17 Renovation of traditional water bodies 95537 1093 1.14 Total 426762 10.69

Convergence: Category-wise expenditure on works Approved in FY 2014-15 (Rs. In Lakh)
SNo. Category Exp. on total works taken Up Exp. on total works takenUp under convergence % of Exp. with Convergence 1 Anganwadi 308.19 95.86 31.10 2 Coastal Areas 42.74 1.04 2.43 3 Drought Proofing 4.33 4 Rural Drinking Water 403.87 1.48 0.37 5 Food Grain 83.02 16.43 19.79 6 Flood Control and Protection 283.14 0.85 7 Fisheries 72.65 3.84 8 Micro Irrigation Works 1.63 9 Works on Individuals Land (Category IV) 1.55 10 Land Development 2.51 11 Other Works 66.62 0.39 12 Play Ground 595 1.34 0.23 13 Rural Connectivity 10.78 14 Rural Sanitation 19.88 15 Bharat Nirman Rajeev Gandhi Sewa Kendra 90.23 6.55 16 Water Conservation and Water Harvesting 699.78 0.66 17 Renovation of traditional water bodies 1.02 Total 4.95

State wise expenditure details: Group-I
Sr. No. States Approved state convergence SCP Performance of SCP Contribution from Total project cost Total expenditure MGNREGA line dept. (in lakh) from MGNREGA for from line dept. for against on SCP convergence project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1.96 BIHAR 891.25 CHHATTISGARH 59500 38085 97585 441.71 0.24 441.96 GOA HIMACHAL PRADESH 8576 12331 20907 78.76 KERALA 469.32 MAHARASHTRA 30784 113017 143801 50.3 MEGHALAYA 5656 12556 18212 44.83 9 NAGALAND 10 ODISHA 94129 22483 116612 340.14 11 RAJASTHAN 40812 33987 74799 12 SIKKIM 3324 6816 10140 539.02 73.71 612.73 13 UTTARAKHAND 6503 3703 10206 40.98 0.53 41.51 14 WEST BENGAL 131509 284397 415906 120.93

State wise expenditure details: Group-II
Sr. No. States Approved state convergence SCP Performance of SCP Contribution from Total project cost Total expenditure MGNREGA line dept. (in lakh) from MGNREGA for from line dept. for against on SCP convergence project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANDHRA PRADESH ASSAM GUJARAT 28181 50749 78930 HARYANA 12492 7462 19954 1.61 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 112.13 JHARKHAND 661.1 KARNATAKA 80663 45228 125891 MADHYA PRADESH 896500 156400 9 MANIPUR 296 960 1256 10 MEGHALAYA 5656 12556 18212 44.83 11 MIZORAM 5679 2553 8232 257.44 12 PUNJAB 99.15 13 TAMIL NADU 132105 44399 176504 695.38 14 TELANGANA 15 TRIPURA 34040 22694 56734 100.69 16 UTTAR PRADESH 6.47

Issues for discussions
Non submission of SCP in required format/ with requisite approval – Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Goa, Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Kerala, Nagaland and Telangana uploading of data Best practices Internal Monitoring mechanism Number of joint Guidelines issued

States to operationalise this convergence on priority
IWMP Convergence Watershed treatment a high priority under MGNREGA Guidelines for convergence with IWMP issued on 11th Aug 2014 Watersheds under MGNREGA: Comprehensive plan covering all needed areas Training of the TAs by SLNA at MGNREGA cost Convergence in IWMP Blocks: Already under implementation Extra NRM works required but couldn’t be taken up for want of IWMP funds Technical inputs will come from WDTs at a cost New IWMP projects All labour intensive NRM works under MGNREGA Other works under IWMP States to operationalise this convergence on priority

Progress of Road-side plantation on PMGSY roads
State Length planted (Kms) Number of plants planted West Bengal Andhra Pradesh 3762 752536 Jharkhand 17089 512670 Karnataka 2383 477000 Assam 692.47 461647 Tamil Nadu 1500 300000 Arunachal Pradesh 1100 290000 Madhya Pradesh 817 281100 Chhattisgarh 269.08 151263 Bihar 270 100000 Orissa 500 Nagaland Uttar Pradesh 1000 Meghalaya 465 68224 Puducherry* 165 50000 Telangana 300 49459 All India total 39685 1,19,90,545

Group-I: Expected vs Actual Outcome (FY 2014-15)
State No. of Works with "expected outcome" filled No. of Works completed with "actual outcome" recorded No. of Works where actual outcome > 10% of expected outcome No. of Works where actual outcome < - 10% of expected outcome ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2103 11 BIHAR 221646 30081 236 198 CHHATTISGARH 60159 22579 90 139 GOA 351 18 HIMACHAL PRADESH 66546 22127 168 221 KERALA 115128 11956 71 150 MAHARASHTRA 166546 80725 1176 697 MEGHALAYA 5745 345 1 NAGALAND 2511 41 ODISHA 180676 22101 119 145 RAJASTHAN 300579 99301 1211 753 SIKKIM 1921 333 5 3 UTTARAKHAND 29344 9656 15 30 WEST BENGAL 304885 27080 88 165 India Total 762926 6636 6234

Group-II: Expected vs Actual Outcome
State No. of Works with "expected outcome" filled No. of Works completed with "actual outcome" recorded No. of Works where actual outcome > 10% of expected outcome No. of Works where actual outcome < - 10% of expected outcome ANDHRA PRADESH NA ASSAM 35947 13385 98 171 GUJARAT 68035 12436 95 199 HARYANA 7928 2278 11 36 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 19354 3076 4 8 JHARKHAND 81761 17828 162 245 KARNATAKA 716777 52533 452 542 MADHYA PRADESH 325017 137753 1477 1119 MANIPUR 7710 289 3 5 MIZORAM 5208 3343 1 PUNJAB 6074 1732 TAMIL NADU 232373 66350 580 921 TELANGANA TRIPURA 64605 8340 13 48 UTTAR PRADESH 364066 117226 558 436 India Total 762926 6636 6234

Group-I: Status of indication, releases and balances available (Rs
Group-I: Status of indication, releases and balances available (Rs. In Lakh) States Fund Allocation based on BE Total Central funds released Balance to be released Arunachal Pradesh 890.60 Bihar Chhattisgarh Goa 38.78 36.95 1.83 Himachal Pradesh Kerala Maharashtra Meghalaya Nagaland Odisha Rajasthan Sikkim Uttarakhand West Bengal National

Group-II: Status of indication, releases and balances available (Rs
Group-II: Status of indication, releases and balances available (Rs. In Lakh) States Fund Allocation based on BE Total Central funds released Balance to be released Andhra Pradesh Assam Gujarat Haryana Jammu and Kashmir Jharkhand Karnataka Madhya Pradesh Manipur Mizoram Punjab Tamilnadu Telangana 169660 Tripura Uttar Pradesh National

Group-I: State funds yet to be released
Shortfall in State release (Rs. In Lakhs) ARUNACHAL PRADESH 938.06 BIHAR CHHATTISGARH GOA HIMACHAL PRADESH KERALA MAHARASHTRA MEGHALAYA NAGALAND ODISHA 645.54 RAJASTHAN SIKKIM UTTAR PRADESH WEST BENGAL NATIONAL

Group-II: State funds yet to be released
Shortfall in State release (Rs. In Lakhs) ANDHRA PRADESH ASSAM GUJARAT HARYANA 3753.8 JAMMU AND KASHMIR JHARKHAND KARNATAKA MADHYA PRADESH MANIPUR MIZORAM 832.61 PUNJAB TAMIL NADU TELANGANA TRIPURA UTTARAKHAND NATIONAL

Certain directions issued
State to implement all payment modules (wages, material & Admin) through eFMS before 1st April, 2015. Postal Dept has to be brought fully under eFMS. Only one eFMS account at the State level. All other accounts to be closed, amounts pooled. Link of State treasuries with PFMS

Group-I: Status of eFMS implementation
State Total Blocks Total GP's % of GPs (for wages) % of GPs (for Material) % of GPs (for Admin) ARUNACHAL PRADESH 112 1827 0.0 BIHAR 534 8529 100.0 CHHATTISGARH 146 9815 GOA 11 190 HIMACHAL PRADESH 78 3243 96.7 KERALA 152 978 MAHARASHTRA 354 28572 MEGHALAYA 39 1823 NAGALAND 74 1175 ODISHA 314 6232 RAJASTHAN 249 9177 SIKKIM 31 180 10.0 UTTARAKHAND 95 7999 95.7 WEST BENGAL 341 3349 Total 6790 248069 93.1 58.7 44.3

Group-II: Status of eFMS implementation
State Total Blocks Total GP's % of GPs (for wages) % of GPs (for Material) % of GPs (for Admin) ANDHRA PRADESH 655 12997 100.0 ASSAM 238 2644 4.2 5.3 GUJARAT 223 14233 0.0 HARYANA 125 6141 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 320 4162 JHARKHAND 260 4435 43.6 25.8 KARNATAKA 176 5632 MADHYA PRADESH 313 23013 MANIPUR 42 3102 MIZORAM 26 828 PUNJAB 146 13116 99.9 TAMIL NADU 385 12524 TELANGANA 443 8866 TRIPURA 58 1135 UTTAR PRADESH 823 52033 Total 6790 248069 93.1 58.7 44.3

Status of eFMS expansion implementation
State Total Blocks No. of Blocks under eFMS expansion plan Total GP's in eFMS exp. plan eFMS Implemented GPs for wages % of eFMS Implemented GPs for wages ARUNACHAL PRADESH 112 97 1682 0.0 ASSAM 238 7 94 100.0 BIHAR 534 8529 GOA 11 190 HIMACHAL PRADESH 78 3243 3137 96.7 J & K 320 148 4133 JHARKHAND 260 48 803 MAHARASHTRA 354 298 23664 23661 MANIPUR 42 41 3028 MEGHALAYA 39 1823 MIZORAM 26 828 NAGALAND 74 1175 PUNJAB 146 22 1833 1832 99.9 SIKKIM 31 30 171 10 5.8 TAMIL NADU 385 317 10644 TRIPURA 58 1135 UTTARAKHAND 95 7888 7555 95.8 WEST BENGAL 341 318 3138 Total 3144 2264 74110 57400 77.5

Group-I: Aadhaar Seeding & Conversions to APBS
State Total Worker Total No. of Aadhaar seeded in MIS % of Aadhaar seeded in MIS No. of Aadhaar pending for PO Verification Total Number of Aadhaar Confirmed Total Number of Workers Converted into APB Ar. Pd 174511 0.0 BIHAR 79 19 9 CHHATTISGARH 309699 4.9 212573 77914 4187 GOA 10958 4880 44.5 1609 3253 HP 915515 765992 83.7 17894 714800 389381 KERALA 82.3 613423 194040 MAHARASHTRA 47.6 790419 122086 MEGHALAYA 592920 1 NAGALAND 484513 ODISHA 255565 6.3 135075 106722 RAJASTHAN 34.1 50079 SIKKIM 97887 68092 69.6 15021 52818 UTTARAKHAND 745431 2796 0.4 1448 1337 WEST BENGAL 13.6 809102 767042 National Total 29.1

Group-II: Aadhaar Seeding & Conversion to APBS
State Total Worker Total No. of Aadhaar seeded in MIS % of Aadhaar seeded in MIS No. of Aadhaar pending for PO Verification Total Number of Aadhaar Confirmed Total Number of Workers Converted into APB ANDHRA PRADESH 87.0 ASSAM 4 0.0 GUJARAT 142373 7.2 80337 54436 HARYANA 764913 454059 59.4 101382 344543 97322 J & K 1 JHARKHAND 65.8 401424 169039 KARNATAKA 40.9 115343 MADHYA PRADESH 11.2 618667 486321 58898 MANIPUR 603042 4168 0.7 1810 2357 MIZORAM 237842 PUNJAB 678532 619609 91.3 31672 561360 276781 TAMIL NADU 30.6 586723 TELANGANA 85.5 TRIPURA 574271 47.6 128079 444038 UTTAR PRADESH 30309 0.3 14779 14680 3077 National Total 29.1

Group-I: Status of Technical Assistants (TAs)
State Esti. TAs required ( Active JC) TAs in place ARUNACHAL PRADESH 66 21 BIHAR 1354 1078 CHHATTISGARH 1255 879 GOA 4 HIMACHAL PRADESH 275 1060 KERALA 761 28 MAHARASHTRA 911 1075 MEGHALAYA 170 93 NAGALAND 167 89 ODISHA 982 1441 RAJASTHAN 2095 556 SIKKIM 29 UTTARAKHAND 243 92 WEST BENGAL 3159 809 NATIONAL 26516 27802

Group-II: Status of Technical Assistants (TAs)
State Esti. TAs required ( Active JC) TAs in place ANDHRA PRADESH 1655 2452 ASSAM 802 70 GUJARAT 423 504 HARYANA 194 55 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 370 566 JHARKHAND 765 68 KARNATAKA 962 1181 MADHYA PRADESH 1976 60 MANIPUR 209 44 MIZORAM 92 135 PUNJAB 222 115 TAMIL NADU 3362 385 TELANGANA 936 (?)9039 TRIPURA 252 344 UTTAR PRADESH 2827 5542 NATIONAL 26516 27802

Cluster Facilitation Team: Progress
Deliverables: 1st Deliverable is preparation of Integrated Watershed Development Plans by 2nd October 2014. Planning Activities: - Planning process in CFT blocks has been dovetailed with IPPE /250 CFT blocks selected for IPPE. - Monitoring format sought on preparation of plans from each block /250 CFT blocks sent format. Funds for Year 1: 100%: Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, West Bengal, Rajasthan, Telengana, Bihar. 5%: Andhra Pradesh. 0%: Uttar Pradesh.

Cluster Facilitation Team: Status
Blocks Monitoring Format CSO's CFT's State Sanctioned Blocks Operational Blocks Deliverable of Integrated Plan No of CSOs registered on MIS No of CFTs registered on MIS for Year 1 Andhra Pradesh 7 0/7 0/1 0/21 Bihar 25 25/25 1/1 29/29 Chhattisgarh 26 23/26 9/9 31/53 Jharkhand 76 76/76 24/28 62/186 Madhya Pradesh 32 9 0/32 4/5 3/57 Maharashtra 13 12/13 11/11 30/31 Odisha 22 19/22 13/13 17/17 Rajasthan 15 0/15 7/13 3/29 Telangana 5 5/5 1/15 Uttar Pradesh 11 0/11 0/33 West Bengal 18 17/18 3/3 10/48 Total 250 209 177/250 74/86 188/519

Next Steps for State Governments
Sanctions: Ensure district administration provides timely sanctions for the plans prepared. Orders: Issue orders to recognise technical inputs by CFTs as required. Barefoot Engineers: Ensure 1 BE placed for every 2500 active job card holders. Capacity Building: Organise state level trainings to build capacity of all CFT members in basics of MGNREGS and SRLM norms for SHG’s and convergence.

Complete Basic Requirements: Ensure required number of CFTs are set up, personnel recruited and data entry done in the MIS. Next review: On other deliverables of: 100 days employment to all active SC/ST job cards & 75% wages to be paid on time.

Next Steps for CFTs Planning: Complete plan preparation of all GP’s of cluster. Gram Sabha’s: Ensure Gram Sabha’s conducted to pass plans and prioritise works. Awareness Activities: Conduct activities for awareness of entitlements. Ensure Rozgar Diwas is be conducted in every ward. Labour Groups: Start formation of Labour Groups to access entitlements. Capacity Building: Continuous capacity building of SHG members, PRI functionaries, NREGA workers, front line functionaries.

Barefoot Engineers: Concepts
Definition: BEF is an educated person from MGNREGS worker household. Scope: 1 BEF placed for every 2500 active job cards holders in IPPE Blocks. Tasks: Identify works, conduct technical surveys, assist in planning and estimate preparation, give lay out for works, supervise work execution, record measurement. Supervision: BEFs will be guided by technical assistant/Junior Engineer/Assistant Engineer. Their recorded measurements will be check measured by Junior Engineer Payment: Paid as skilled workers through 1% of work estimate via muster roll.

Barefoot Engineers: Progress so far
Development of National Occupational Standards (NOS): On Barefoot Engineers drafted in conjunction with ILO, DDU-GKY, National Skill Development Corporation. Ratification of NOS: Consultation to ratify NOS with technical persons in state governments held in December 2014. Guidelines on Barefoot Engineers: Issued on 2nd January 2015 detailing definition, scope of work, eligibility, identification, selection etc.

Barefoot Engineers: Next Steps
Identification of areas: State governments to identify those areas in 2500 IPPE blocks which require Barefoot Engineers by 31st January 2015. Selection of Candidates: State governments to identify suitable candidates meeting eligibility criteria by 28th February Preference to be given to SC/ST and women candidates. Training of Selected Candidates: First phase of training for Barefoot Engineers based on NOS via DDU-GKY from April – June 2015. Certification of Barefoot Engineers: On conclusion of training DDU-GKY with certify BEF’s as per NOS and recognised by National Skills Development Council. Deployment: State Governments to recognise trained BEF’s and deploy them in identified areas.

Labour Groups Mandate:
As per Section 28 of Schedule I of the Act, state governments are to undertake the task of organising MGNREGS workers into Labour Groups. Minimum Principles: To operationalise this provision, a draft of Principles on Organisation of Workers has been shared with States for comments.

Labour Groups: Main Provisions
Definition: Labour group will consist of households with jobcards which has worked for 10 days in the previous year and contiguous to neighbourhood level (i.e. hamlet, tola) Role: Ensure worker entitlements as per the Act & strengthen community monitoring of the implementation of the program. Process of formation: Programme Officers to undertake the task of labour group formation with assistance of GRS and records group details on MIS.

Labour Groups: Main Provisions
Functioning: Labour groups will have two leaders and meet regularly. Mandated regular meetings between labour group leaders and GP officials to be institutionalised for redress of grievances. Existing Labour Groups: May be approached to assist state governments in an advisory role and interaction formalised through regular meetings such as samvaads etc.

Labour Groups: Next Steps
State governments to initiate labour group formation in 2500 IPPE Blocks. Process: List of eligible HHs (10 days work) on website Organised habitation-wise Meeting of these HHs at habitation level in Jan/Feb Voluntary formation of group based on homogeneity Identification of two leaders within the group Registration of group in the website by the PO Completion of formation of groups by October 2015 – to be monitored monthly by States

Status of roll out of Special Project for Social Audit
Out of 28 States, 18 States have not set up SAUs as per the Audit of Scheme Rules Resource persons State level: Sanctioned: 149 Filled : 63 Vacant: 86 (notifications issued for only 12) District level: Sanctioned: 1182 Filled: 582 Vacant: 600 (notification issued only for 38 vacancies)

Synergy with C&AG Meeting held with the C&AG on 1/12/2014 to review the implementation of the Audit of Scheme Rules, 2011. Following decisions taken: a) The C&AG will undertake a Compliance Audit on the implementation of the Audit of Scheme Rules, 2011 b) Principal Accountant General/his nominee would participate as a member in the Governing Bodies of State Social Audit Units and advise the Units on ways to strengthen social audits in the State c) Conducting a National Workshop with Directors, State Social Audit Units; Principal Secretaries, Department of Rural Development and Principal Accountant Generals of all States on 13th March 2015

Recent Developments Government of Bihar to undertake a Social Audit Campaign in partnership with MoRD and local CSOs in 200 GPs (2nd Feb-19th Feb 2015) Government of Jharkhand to undertake a Social Audit Campaign in partnership with MoRD and local CSOs in 50 GPs (8th Feb-28th Feb 2015) Monthly Video Conference to review the status of compliance with Audit of Scheme Rules, 2011

Skilling MGNREGA workers
Eligibility: 15 days work Types: Agricultural labour cooperatives Construction labour cooperatives Skilling for job placement Identification of agencies by DDU-SKY Time lines proposed in the Note – to be finalised after discussion

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback