Presentation on theme: "Science According to the National Academy of Sciences, Science is the use of evidence to construct testable explanations and predictions of natural phenomena,"— Presentation transcript:
Science According to the National Academy of Sciences, Science is the use of evidence to construct testable explanations and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated through this process. Phenomena are the events that are observed to happen. Evidence are observable facts and measurements of the natural world that can be used to evaluate hypotheses, theories, and other scientific explanations.
Scientific Method How is Science different from other fields of study? Science uses the scientific inquiry, or the scientific method Deductive Reasoning- general to specific reasoning from general theories to account for specific experimental results (theory-data collection-analysis) Inductive Reasoning- specific to general reasoning from specific observations and experiments to more general theories (data collection-analysis-theory)
Scientific Method How is Science different from other fields of study? Science uses scientific inquiry, or the scientific method Deductive Reasoning- general to specific reasoning from general theories to account for specific experimental results (theory-data collection-analysis) Inductive Reasoning- specific to general reasoning from specific observations and experiments to more general theories (data collection-analysis-theory)
Scientific Method Observations Question Formulate Hypothesis Conduct Experiment to test Hypothesis Analyze Results Conclusions Publish
Observation: The car won’t start when I turn the ignition. Question: Hypothesis: Test hypothesis: Analyze Results: Draw Conclusion: New hypothesis:
Scientific Method Observations –Suggest questions to investigate Question –Why does something happen Research the question Hypothesis –A testable explanation for an observation
Scientific Method Conduct Experiment –Process of testing a hypothesis or prediction by gathering data under controlled conditions –Control vs Experimental Group Control group: a group that has not been exposed to some factor (variable). It is used to compare the experimental group. Experimental group: a group that has been exposed to the factor (variable) Independent variable (IV): the variable you manipulate that you believe will affect the DV Dependent variable (DV): the outcome variable, i.e., variable you measure
Collect, organize, analyze data –Determine whether data is reliable –Determine whether data supports or does not support the hypothesis or prediction –May use statistics Compare data from other studies Determine relationships Determine experimental error Scientific Method
Drawing Conclusions –To understand something not previously understood –To produce a model Construct a representation of an object, a system, or a process to help show relationships given the data A model is an explanation supported by data Use the model to generate new hypotheses or predictions Scientific Method
The last step of the Scientific Method is to publish the work. Scientist publish their work so that other scientist can replicate their work. If other scientist can not replicate the work, the conclusions will not be accepted by the scientific community.
Biased sampling: A sampling technique that does not give you a representative sample. Confounding factors: factors that were not accounted for in the design that may affect the Independent Variable Method for Reducing Bias: Randomization in sample selection Replication:This is necessary to estimate the degree of chance variation among samples. Randomization: Ensures that each subject in a population or each site used for sampling has an equal opportunity of being selected. Experimental Design
Sample Size: The larger the sample size, the better. A larger sample size tends to give you a closer estimate of the true population mean. Experimental Design
A theory is a broad powerful explanation of events in the natural world, supported by the results of many experiments. –Unifying explanations for a broad range of observations –Based on testing a collection of related hypotheses –The solid foundation of science –Can be revised given new evidence Scientific Method- Theory
Scientific Hypothesis A tentative scientific explanation that attempts to answer questions asked about natural phenomena. A proposed explanation made on the basis of observation, used to begin a scientific experiment A tentative scientific explanation that attempts to answer questions asked about natural phenomena. A proposed explanation made on the basis of observation, used to begin a scientific experiment
Hypothesis Based on opinion and observation Can NOT be proven true and can only be supported NEVER EVER EVER can we call them true
Practice Bart believes that mice exposed to microwaves will become extra strong (maybe he's been reading too much Radioactive Man). He decides to perform this experiment by placing 10 mice in a microwave for 10 seconds. He compared these 10 mice to another 10 mice that had not been exposed. His test consisted of a heavy block of wood that blocked the mouse food. Independent variable (IV):_(The thing that is changed) ____________ ____________________________________________________________ Dependent variable (DV):__(The thing that will be measured) ___________________________________________________________ Constants: _(The things that will kept the same) ___________________________________________________ Control: ___(The things that will be kept the same ___________________________________________________ Hypothesis: If… _____________________________________________________ then… ___________________________________________________
Scientific Theory A widely accepted, well documented statement that addresses and explains many independent observations of nature. A broad, powerful explanation of events in the natural world, supported by the results of many experiments A widely accepted, well documented statement that addresses and explains many independent observations of nature. A broad, powerful explanation of events in the natural world, supported by the results of many experiments
Scientific Theory A theory explains how nature works 1.should be rational and logical 2.should be relevant 3.should be extensible A theory explains how nature works 1.should be rational and logical 2.should be relevant 3.should be extensible
Ptolemy (170 A.D.)- geocentric universe, earth centered universe Copernicus (1500’s)- heliocentric universe; sun centered universe not accepted until 100 years after his death Galileo (1600’s)- physicist, astronomer, first to use scientific method ; confirmed earth revolved around the sun
Scientific or Natural Law A description or rule for how nature appears to behave. A law has a small likelihood of being found incorrect. A Scientific Law describes what nature does under certain conditions
Scientific or Natural Law Mainly found in physics and chemistry.
First & Second Laws of Thermodynamics Matter & Energy Entropy
It’s YOUR turn now Work in groups of 4. Come up with a problem that a new student at AHS might have. Use all the steps of the Scientific Method to find a solution. Cycle through the Hypothesis/Experiment loop at least twice.
The Blind Men and the Elephant (Saxe; 1816-1887) I. It was six men of Indostan To learn much inclined, Who went to see the elephant (Though all of them were blind), That each by observation Might satisfy their mind. II. The First approached the elephant, And happened to fall Against his broad sturdy side, At once began to bawl: “Bless me!—but the Elephant is very like a wall!”
III. The Second, feeling of the tusk, Cried, “Ho!—what have we here So very round and smooth and sharp? To me ‘t is mighty clear This wonder of an Elephant Is very like a spear!” IV. The Third approached the animal, And happening to take The squirming trunk within his hands, Thus boldly up and spake: “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant Is very like a snake!”
V. The Fourth reached out his eager hand, And felt about the knee. “What most this wondrous beast is like Is might plain’” quoth he; “‘T is clear enough the Elephant Is very like a tree!” VI. The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear, Said, “E’en the blindest man Can tell what this resembles most; Deny the fact who can, This marvel of an Elephant Is very like a fan!”
VII. The Sixth no sooner had begun About the beast to grope, Than seizing on the swinging tail That fell within his scope, “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant Is very like a rope!” VIII. And so these men of Indostan Disputed loud and long, Each with his own opinion Exceeding stiff and strong, Though each was partly in the right, And all were in the wrong!
Moral. So, oft in these theological wars The disputants, I ween, Rail on in utter ignorance Of what each other mean, And prate about an elephant Not one of them has seen!
The Blind Men and the Elephant, Part 2, I. They talked, those men from Indostan While standing at the door, Of elephants and how they looked (This talk was such a bore!), At last they agreed that the knowledge gained Required something more. II. Perhaps each one in his own way, Did learn a bit Of the beast’s elusive mystery, But just a part of it With work, they thought, that they might see The puzzle pieces fit.
III. ‘Twas obvious to all of them For learning to progress, That they must share in what they found— Jointly sort out the mess. And seek to fully understand Elephants, more or less. IV. Some worked alone and some in teams, In both the field and lab. Models were made: some soft, some hard Some good, some pretty bad. But when they pooled the useful work, And truth they made a grab.
V. They checked each other’s methods out, Some kept, some put asunder. To use the ones which passed the test Reduced the chance of blunder. Then they’d trust what they had learned Of elephants’ fine wonders. VI. They made great strides in what they knew Of the nature of the beast. Of what and where and how and why They knew much more at least. For blind men learned how best to learn And vision soon increased!
Inquiry In your table groups discuss the following question. Compare the similarities and differences between a hypothesis, scientific theory and scientific law?