Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAnastasia Christian Modified over 2 years ago

1
Wrinkled flame propagation in narrow channels: What Darrieus & Landau didn’t tell you http://cpl.usc.edu/HeleShaw M. Abid, J. A. Sharif, P. D. Ronney Dept. of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453 USA

2
Introduction Models of premixed turbulent combustion don’t agree with experiments nor each other!

3
Introduction - continued... 4 different flows no adjustable parameters …whereas in “liquid flame” experiments, S T /S L in 4 different flows is consistent with Yakhot’s model with no adjustable parameters

4
Why are gaseous flames harder to model & compare (successfully) to experiments? One reason: self-generated wrinkling due to flame instabilities Thermal expansion (Darrieus-Landau, DL) Rayleigh-Taylor (buoyancy-driven, RT) Viscous fingering (Saffman-Taylor, ST) in Hele-Shaw cells when viscous fluid displaced by less viscous fluid Diffusive-thermal (DT) (Lewis number) Joulin & Sivashinsky (1994) - combined effects of DL, ST, RT & heat loss (but no DT effect - no damping at small )

5
Objectives n Use Hele-Shaw flow to study flame instabilities in premixed gases Flow between closely-spaced parallel plates Described by linear 2-D equation (Darcy’s law) 1000's of references Practical application: flame propagation in cylinder crevice volumes Measure Wrinkling characteristics Propagation rates

6
Apparatus Aluminum frame sandwiched between Lexan windows 40 cm x 60 cm x 1.27 or 0.635 cm test section CH 4 & C 3 H 8 fuel, N 2 & CO 2 diluent - affects Le, Peclet # Upward, horizontal, downward orientation Spark ignition (1 or 3 locations)

7
Results - videos - “baseline” case 6.8% CH 4 -air, horizontal, 12.7 mm cell

8
Results - videos - upward propagation 6.8% CH 4 -air, upward, 12.7 mm cell

9
Results - videos - downward propagation 6.8% CH 4 -air, downward, 12.7 mm cell

10
Results - videos - high Lewis number 3.2% C 3 H 8 -air, horizontal, 12.7 mm cell (Le ≈ 1.7)

11
Results - videos - low Lewis number 8.0% CH 4 - 32.0% O 2 - 60.0% CO 2, horizontal, 12.7 mm cell (Le ≈ 0.7)

12
Results - videos - low Peclet number 5.8% CH 4 - air, horizontal, 6.3 mm cell (Pe ≈ 26(!))

13
Results - qualitative n Orientation effects u Horizontal propagation - large wavelength wrinkle fills cell u Upward propagation - more pronounced large wrinkle u Downward propagation - globally flat front (buoyancy suppresses large-scale wrinkles); oscillatory modes, transverse waves u Consistent with Joulin-Sivashinsky predictions n Large-scale wrinkling observed even at high Le; small scale wrinkling suppressed at high Le For practical range of conditions, buoyancy & diffusive-thermal effects cannot prevent wrinkling due to viscous fingering & thermal expansion For practical range of conditions, buoyancy & diffusive-thermal effects cannot prevent wrinkling due to viscous fingering & thermal expansion Evidence of preferred wavelengths, but selection mechanism unclear (DT + ?)

14
Results - propagation rates 3-stage propagation Thermal expansion - most rapid Quasi-steady Near-end-wall - slowest - large-scale wrinkling suppressed Quasi-steady propagation rate (S T ) always larger than S L - typically 3S L even though u’/S L = 0!

15
Results - orientation effect Horizontal - S T /S L ≈ independent of Pe = S L w/ n Upward - S T /S L as Pe (decreasing benefit of buoyancy); highest propagation rates n Downward - S T /S L as Pe (decreasing penalty of buoyancy); lowest propagation rates n S T /S L converges to ≈ constant value at large Pe

16
Results - Lewis # effect n S T /S L generally slightly higher at lower Le n CH 4 -air (Le ≈ 0.9) - S T /S L ≈ independent of Pe n C 3 H 8 -air (Le ≈ 1.7) - S T /S L as Pe n CH 4 -O 2 -CO 2 (Le ≈ 0.7) - S T /S L as Pe n S T /S L ≈ independent of Le at higher Pe n Fragmented flames at low Le & Pe

17
Results - orientation effect revisited

19
Results - pressure characteristics n Initial pressure rise after ignition n Pressure ≈ constant during quasi-steady phase n Pressure rise higher for faster flames Slow flameFast flame

20
Conclusions Flame propagation in quasi-2D Hele-Shaw cells reveals effects of Thermal expansion - always present Viscous fingering - narrow channels, long wavelengths Buoyancy - destabilizing/stabilizing at long wavelengths for upward/downward propagation Lewis number – affects behavior at small wavelengths but propagation rate & large-scale structure unaffected Heat loss (Peclet number) – little effect

21
Remark Most experiments conducted in open flames (Bunsen, counterflow,...) - gas expansion relaxed in 3rd dimension … but most practical applications in confined geometries, where unavoidable thermal expansion (DL) & viscous fingering (ST) instabilities cause propagation rates ≈ 3 S L even when heat loss, Lewis number & buoyancy effects are negligible DL & ST effects may affect propagation rates substantially even when strong turbulence is present - generates wrinkling up to scale of apparatus (S T /S L ) Total = (S T /S L ) Turbulence x (S T /S L ) ThermalExpansion ?

22
Remark n Computational studies suggest similar conclusions u Early times, turbulence dominates u Late times, thermal expansion dominates H. Boughanem and A. Trouve, 27th Symposium, p. 971. Initial u'/S L = 4.0 (decaying turbulence); integral-scale Re = 18

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Analogies among Mass, Heat, and Momentum Transfer

Analogies among Mass, Heat, and Momentum Transfer

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on fire extinguisher types and uses Ppt on gas metal arc welding Ppt on two step equations Ppt on crash fire tender Ppt on smoking and drinking Ppt on low level language assembly Ppt on range of hearing Ppt on id ego superego freud Ppt on power generation by coal Ppt on waves physics class 11