Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

What HL7 Made Possible Ken Smith –

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "What HL7 Made Possible Ken Smith –"— Presentation transcript:

1 What HL7 Made Possible Ken Smith –

2  Senior Integration Specialist – BridgeForward  Integration Specialist – GOSH (formerly)

3  Specialty Children’s Hospital  Tertiary Referral  Complex cases (multiple specialties)  Long term cases (seen over long periods of time)  Critical cases  Large international and private patient service

4  Establish integrity of patient data across departmental systems  Exchange and make use of clinical information  Automate processing of billable costs for private patient billing

5  Patient data has to be kept current across multiple systems  Has to be kept current over time  Updates have to be instantaneous  Updates have to account for different patient populations (NHS and private)

6  PAS (iPM from iSOFT) the source of all patient data  PAS not accept patient data from other systems  Drip-feed (publish/subscribe)  Query/response

7  Initially, no HL7 messages from PAS  Make do:  Poll extracts tables (simulate drip-feed)  Query of PAS database  Construct non-HL7 messages  Mitigated by few interfaces built at this stage

8  Upgrade of PAS  Full set of HL7 messages, drip-feed and query/response  More interfaces, more quickly  Discovered variability in interpretations and requirements of HL7  Placement of NHS ID in drip feed and q/r  Formatting of data  Differences in coded value lists  Confidentiality

9  Notification systems  Pathology results notification  Radiology results notification  Patient death notification  2 out of the 3 were failures  Failed to engage the clinicians

10  Sharing clinical information much more difficult  Building a clinical application, not an integration  Clinical practices and applications highly localized (specialty and context)  Informatics (analysis) is as or more important than technology  HL7 2.x vs. HL7 3  Clinician involvement necessary (do it for them, not to them)  Greater challenge holds promise of greater rewards

11  Recoverable/billable costs:  Pathology tests  Radiology tests  Pharmacy prescriptions  Route from source departments into Private Patient system

12  Each department created spreadsheets of costs for each patient for specific time  Naturally, each spreadsheet in different format  Integration engine processed spreadsheets, and shoehorned different column formats into a proprietary, non HL7 message format  It was a pain from start to finish  If only…

13

14  Starts and ends with HL7  HL7 2.x almost universal, but variable  HL7 transport neutral  No use of HL7 3.0  HL7 needs tools  Success with patient data easier to achieve  Goal is not to deliver healthcare IT integrations, but integration solutions that improve delivery of clinical care


Download ppt "What HL7 Made Possible Ken Smith –"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google