Presentation on theme: "Chapter 8 Promoting and enforcing human rights. In this chapter, you will look at the promotion and enforcement of human rights in both the international."— Presentation transcript:
Chapter 8 Promoting and enforcing human rights
In this chapter, you will look at the promotion and enforcement of human rights in both the international community and under Australian law. You will consider the different legal sources of human rights protection, the role of intergovernmental organisations, NGOs and the media, and the role of courts and tribunals in enforcing human rights. Finally, you will consider the case for a Charter of Rights in Australian law.
The effectiveness of human rights depends on the will of the international community to implement them. It also depends on the mechanisms in place to ensure human rights are respected, promoted and enforced. Promoting and enforcing human rights
Human rights are advanced on two broad levels: internationally and domestically. At each level, there are governing bodies responsible for complying with and promoting them, courts responsible for enforcing them, and various organisations that report on and expose non-compliance. Promoting and enforcing human rights
A state (country) is the basic unit of the international system – states are the only entities in international law capable of exercising full political and legal capacity. Legal recognition of a state requires a number of factors. Statehood can have implications for human rights. Today, there are 192 fully recognised state members of the United Nations, but there are also a number of disputed territories not yet fully recognised as states. State sovereignty – statehood
State sovereignty refers to the ultimate law-making power of a state, and a state’s independence and freedom from external interference in its own affairs. Sovereignty is the source of a state’s legal and political power to make laws over its own population and enforce those laws. State sovereignty – sovereignty
The UN Charter recognises the sovereign equality of all states. However, in the modern international system, state sovereignty is no longer absolute – it is limited under international law by certain duties and obligations owed to the international community. State sovereignty – sovereignty
One of the major problems in human rights is that not all governments equally accept the idea that their own people have certain rights. Some countries may rely on state sovereignty to justify mistreatment of their own citizens – in extreme cases, countries may commit human rights abuses with impunity. State sovereignty and human rights
State sovereignty can be used as a shield by states against outside interference in their own affairs. However, countries today form part of a community where they are interdependent and interrelated – international agreements create concrete legal obligations, including the UN Charter. State sovereignty and human rights
The UN was established with the signing of the UN Charter in 1945, following World War II. The role of the United Nations
Today, it is a vast organisation with substantial power, consisting of 192 member states, including almost every sovereign state in the world. It is the principal international organisation, with responsibility for almost every aspect of international affairs, including human rights. The role of the United Nations
The UN consists of five principle organs, as well as a large amount of agencies, committees and other organisations. The main organs include: General Assembly (UNGA) – representatives from all member states with equal voting power; the main forum for international discussions and recommendations Security Council (UNSC) – charged with maintenance of inter- national peace and security; can make legally binding resolutions, including authorising military actions or sanctions; five permanent members with power to veto decisions (US, UK, China, Russia and France), and ten non-permanent members with two-year terms. The United Nations – organs
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) – 54 rotating members meeting annually; includes various committees and acts as the central forum for discussion of economic, social, environmental and humanitarian issues. Secretariat – headed by the Secretary-General (Ban Ki-moon), it is the main administrative body of the UN; provides the various information, studies, tasks and facilities needed by the UN and includes the departments and offices of the UN. International Court of Justice (ICJ) – principal judicial organ of the UN; has jurisdiction to settle international disputes submitted by member states. The United Nations – organs
Office of the Human Rights Commissioner (OHRC) – administrative agency under the UN Secretariat; works to promote and protect the human rights contained in the UDHR and international law; headed by the UN Human Rights Commissioner who reports directly to the UN Secretary- General. The United Nations – other bodies
Human Rights Council – established in 2006 under the UN General Assembly to replace the previous Commission on Human Rights; aims to address human rights violations worldwide and make recommendations; can hear complaints from any member state on human rights abuses. The United Nations – other bodies
Traditionally, the UN has had little legal or political ability to intervene in situations of serious human rights abuses, due to the issue of state sovereignty, as well as political difficulties within the UN structure. Between , the world community, the Security Council, the Secretary-General and the General Assembly adopted a new approach to human rights abuses, called the ‘Responsibility to Protect’. UN and Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
The doctrine aims to make protection of human rights an integral part of the responsibility that goes with being a sovereign state and includes three ‘Pillars’: –states have a responsibility to protect their populations from these crimes –the international community is responsible for assisting states to build their own capacity to protect their populations before such crises or conflicts break out –when a state has manifestly failed to protect its citizens and where peaceful means are inadequate, the international community must take action to prevent harm. UN and Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
IGOs are international institutions created by agreement that are comprised of various member states. Apart from the UN, a number of IGOs include human rights as part of their stated goals and can exert significant influence over their member states. Intergovernmental organisations (IGOs)
Some major IGOs include: –Commonwealth of Nations: 54 members including Australia; has a strong history in promoting human rights and has in the past suspended or expelled members for persistent abuses –African Union: 53 members across Africa; includes the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Intergovernmental organisations (IGOs)
International Court of Justice (ICJ): –can hear and judge disputes between states, and issue advisory opinions on matters of international law –requires the consent of state parties to hear matters, limiting its power –unable to hear cases brought by individual people or private organisations, and little power of enforcement –has heard very few cases on human rights abuse. Courts, tribunals and independent statutory authorities
International Criminal Court (ICC): –not a court for human rights, but prosecutes and hears matters of the most serious international crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes –has jurisdiction to prosecute individual people rather than states, which potentially makes it a powerful institution.
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): –considers cases brought by individuals, as well as organisations and state, against all countries bound by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) –has 47 members, including all members of the European Union, as well as other European states like Russia and Turkey –has been very successful and its decisions are highly influential.
There are a number of bodies established under human rights treaties that are linked to the UN. One of the most important of these is the Human Rights Committee: –assesses member state compliance with the ICCPR and can hear complaints by both states and individual citizens about a member’s performance –a quasi-judicial body, where a group of human rights experts will hear a complaint brought against a state and make a ruling –a significant case involving a complaint against human rights in Australia was that of Toonen v Australia. Other authorities
NGOs are organisations created by people that are independent and without representation of any government. Their number has increased exponentially over the last century, and many are concerned with monitoring or reporting on human rights abuses. One of the oldest and most important international NGOs is the International Committee of the Red Cross. Non-government organisations (NGOs)
The media plays a crucial role in exposing abuse and ‘naming and shaming’ human rights violators to help bring about change. Media freedom is severely restricted in many countries, where it can be dangerous for reporters to undertake their work. One international NGO called Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF) releases an annual report on media freedom around the world. The role of the media
There is no one document in Australia where human rights are contained. Instead, human rights are derived from different sources, including: –international treaties –the Constitution of Australia –the common law –statute law of the Commonwealth, states and territories. Human rights in Australian law
Under Australian law, simply signing a treaty does not make it enforceable within Australia. The rights and obligations of the treaty will need to be incorporated into Australian law in some way. Usually when the Commonwealth ratifies a treaty, Parliament will pass legislation that echoes the words of the treaty or amends existing laws to incorporate the treaty’s obligations. Incorporation of human rights into domestic law
The Australian Constitution plays two important roles in protecting human rights for Australians: it lays down the system of Australian government through which human rights are recognised, including the separation of powers and division of powers it is the source of some specific human rights, including express rights and implied rights. The role of the Constitution
Separation of powers Describes the separation of the three branches of government, including the Legislature (parliament), the Executive (government) and the Judiciary (courts). Under the Australian Constitution, the judiciary is strictly separated from the other two arms. This is essential in upholding the rule of law and avoiding the risk of abuse of power by the other arms of government or by a politicised judiciary. The role of the Constitution
Division of powers The Constitution defines how legislative power is divided between the Commonwealth and state parliaments. One area that has been crucial for the development of human rights in Australia has been the Commonwealth’s external affairs power under section 51(xxix). The role of the Constitution
Division of powers The growth of human rights treaties in international law has allowed the Commonwealth to ratify these treaties, and then legislate on human rights obligations that bind the states and improve national recognition of human rights. The role of the Constitution
Rights in the Constitution The Constitution defines some limited express rights, including freedom of religion (s 116), the right to vote in Commonwealth elections (s 41), or the right to trial by jury in federal cases (s 80). The High Court has also judged that certain implied rights can be read into the text and structure of the Constitution, including the implied right to freedom of political communication (Lange). The role of the Constitution
Some examples of fundamental rights protected by the common law are the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof, and the right to a fair trial. However, rights in the common law are not absolute and can be removed by legislation. The common law cannot be relied upon to develop new rights, as judgments can only define those rights on an ad hoc, case-by-case basis. The role of common law
In recent years, the Commonwealth, states and territories have enacted a large body of statute law to protect human rights in Australia. Some of the most important legislation includes: –Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) –Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) –Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) –Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). The role of statute law
Australian Human Rights Commission An independent national body established to deal mainly with issues relating to Australia’s human rights legislation. Can receive and investigate complaints into discrimination and breaches of human rights. Courts and tribunals
High Court of Australia Matters involving human rights might can appear before any state or federal courts or tribunals. Courts and tribunals
High Court of Australia However, the High Court has the power to set binding precedents, and to overturn legislation incompatible with the Australian Constitution. The High Court has recognised international law as ‘a legitimate and important influence on the common law, especially when international law declares the existence of universal human rights’. Courts and tribunals
As with international NGOs, Australian NGOs can play an important role in protecting individuals’ rights, shaping public and political opinion, and exposing violations of human rights. Important NGOs working for human rights in Australia include Civil Liberties Australia, Rights Australia or the Law Council of Australia. Non-government organisations
The media plays an indispensable role in ‘naming and shaming’ human rights violators and can have a significant influence on public opinion and government action. Australia is ranked as one of the top countries in the world for media freedom, and reporters, particularly the ABC and SBS play a critical role in reporting on both Australian and international human rights issues. The role of the media
Many states around the world have opted to protect their citizens’ rights through adoption of a central bill or charter of human rights. In Australia, Victoria and the ACT have adopted state-based charters of rights, but the Commonwealth has no such document. A Charter of Rights
The Australian Government recently conducted an inquiry into whether Australia should adopt such a charter. Although the inquiry found overwhelming support for a charter, in 2010 the Australian Government rejected the recommendation, instead opting for a non-binding framework of measures. It remains to be seen if a charter will be adopted by any future Australian Government. Some of the arguments for and against a charter of rights are discussed in the following slides. A Charter of Rights
Arguments for a Charter of Rights: high community support redressing the inadequacy of existing protections reflecting basic Australian values protecting the marginalised and disadvantaged.
Arguments for a Charter of Rights: improving quality and accountability of government contributing to a culture of respect for human rights improving Australia’s international standing bringing Australia into line with other democracies generating economic benefits.
Arguments against a Charter of Rights: current human rights protections are adequate might undermine parliamentary sovereignty, or risk transferring legislative power to unelected judges no better human rights protection is necessarily guaranteed.
Arguments against a Charter of Rights: potentially negative outcomes for human rights risk of excessive and costly litigation democratic processes and institutions offer better protection economic cost unnecessarily legalised human rights.