1. Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013

2. NO Faculty Members provide reports to Dept. Chairs Due September 3-17 2. Individual Faculty Member’s Responsibility Non-Dept. Chair administrative assignment? YES Faculty Members provide administrative aspect of report to Supervisor Faculty Member prepares 3-page report, including specified % weights attaches maximum 5 pages of attachments, including Academic Affairs Data Sheet administrative assignment is Dept. Chair? YES NO Dean evaluates Chair administrative assignment after Chair and Dept. Personnel Committee Evaluation of other areas, as part of 4. Dean’s Review

3. Dept. Chairs evaluate according to Dept. Criteria (second review) Due Oct. 10 3. Department Review and Evaluation Dept. Chairs give Faculty Reports to Dept. Personnel Committees Dept. Personnel Committees evaluate according to Dept. Criteria (first review) Supervisors of Administrative Assignments evaluate administrative aspect of Report Supervisors of Administrative Assignments provide Evaluation of administrative aspect of Report to Dept. Chairs Dept. Personnel Committees provide Evaluation to Dept. Chairs

4. Overall Evaluation differences? Dept Chairs and Dept. Personnel Committees attempt to reconcile 3. Department Review and Evaluation YES NO Due Oct. 24 Faculty may forward 1-Page Objection to Dept. Evaluations with College Personnel Committee Due Nov. 1 Dept. Chairs submit Evaluations to Deans Dept. Chairs provide Dept. Personnel Committees’ and Chairs’ Evaluations to Faculty

5. Dean meets Dept Chairs and Dept. Personnel Committees to make determination 4. Dean’s Review YES NO Dean disagrees with Evaluations? Dean consults College Committees, changes only made if Personnel committee agrees. YES NO Due Nov. 12 Faculty submitted 1-Page Objection to Dept. Review? Dean considers objections in final Evaluations YES NO Review Process Complete: Dean provides Evaluations to Provost and Faculty Dept. Evaluations differences unreconciled?

6. Disproportional “Contributing Exceptionally” designations? Dean and College Personnel Committee review to make determination, reconcile differences 5. Dean and College Personnel Committee Role YES NO YES NO Dean and College Personnel Committee address issue and forward recommendations to Provost YES NO overall “Contributing Exceptionally” or “Contributing Below Expectations”? Dean and College Personnel Committee disagree? Overall Assessment will be “Contributing” 6. Disproportional “Contributing Exceptionally”

7. may ask College Evaluation Committee to review Dept. Evaluation Guidelines and Processes 7. College and University Standards YES NO YES Dean believes Dept. not maintaining College standards? Provost believes College not maintaining University standards? may ask University FAC Committee to review College Evaluation Guidelines and Processes

8. Appeals Process Committee affirms “Contributing Below Expectations” assessment? YES Due Nov. 30 Due Jan. 31 Overall Assessment will be “Contributing” Overall Assessment will be “Contributing Below Expectations” NO faculty member appeals final overall “Contributing Below Expectations” assessment to College Appeals/Grievance Committee College Appeals/Grievance Committee reviews relevant material, reports recommendation to Dean and Faculty

9. Appeals Process Due Feb. 7 Dean forwards recommendation to Provost Faculty with “Contributing Below Expectations” Overall Assessment confirmed may send a response to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs