1. 1

2. *Source: FAST, PPI, and facility logs as of January 9, 2014 Of the total uses of force, there have been 17 investigations generated, two of which are being investigated criminally. 2

3. 3 72 percent of force incidents in 2013 were Category 1 (no injury). USE OF FORCE INCIDENTS 5 Year Average 2013 Incidents % Difference Facility20082009201020112012 CRDF706586934872.441-43.37% EAST174119222023.815-36.97% IRC24321314311063154.492-40.41% MCJ273330167172136215.6122-43.41% NCCF7371102777579.667-15.83% NORTH3380018.46-28.57% SOUTH172619131818.614-24.73% TTCF24329620094111188.825434.53% 9691050736581472761.6611-19.77%

4. 4 Significant Use of Force was defined as force resulting in a complaint of pain, visible injury, indication of or alleged misconduct, or application of any force greater than described as insignificant. A Use of Force is classified as Category 2 whenever the application results in any identifiable injury or involves any application of force not defined in Category 1 (i.e. Hobbling, resisted control holds, take downs, use of OC spray or powder). Category 3 Uses of Force includes head strikes, shootings, fractures, deliberately/recklessly striking the head against hard, fixed objects, or any force which results in an IAB response. SIGNIFICANT USES OF FORCE 5 Year Average 2013 Cat 2 & 3 % Difference Facility20082009201020112012 CRDF363752631540.611-72.9% EAST41661189.05-44.4% IRC1661641018420107.025-76.6% MCJ17125811613968150.442-72.1% NCCF494557434247.221-55.5% NORTH196 08.33-64.0% SOUTH122411 13.83-78.3% TTCF1502081496862127.463-50.5% 607758492419226500.4173-65.4%

5. 5

6. 6

7. 7

8. 8 * CCJV items are filled, however other supervisory vacancies still exist The majority of the remaining unfilled items are professional staff positions which take significantly longer to hire.