Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discussion Points PPD-8 – National Preparedness

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Discussion Points PPD-8 – National Preparedness"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities Washington, DC March 26, 2012

2 Discussion Points PPD-8 – National Preparedness
FY 2012 – A Year of Transition Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative FY 2013 – What’s Next State Administrative Agent How Can Grant Funding Be Utilized What Colleges and Universities Need to Do Resources

3 PPD-8 National Preparedness
Aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the U.S. through “systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation” An evolutionary step from current HSPD-8 methods Signed March 30, 2011; replaces HSPD-8 and Annex 1 PPD Implementation Plan delivered on May 27, 2011; approved by the President for release on July 8, 2011 A Linking together of the national efforts, organized around key elements the ends we wish to achieve (the National Preparedness Goal – Completed) the means to achieve it (the National Preparedness System – Completed) the delivery; how we use what we build (National Frameworks – Due 6/30/2012; Federal Interagency Operational Plans – Due 9/25/2012) the reporting of our progress (Annual National Preparedness Report – Due 3/30/2012 and annually thereafter) the sustained engagement (Build and Sustain Preparedness - Ongoing)

4 PPD-8 Key Principles Employ an all-of-Nation/whole community approach, integrating efforts across federal, state, local, tribal and territorial governments and with private sector, community, non-governmental, and individual partners Use a risk-based approach to support preparedness Build core capabilities to confront any challenge Integrate efforts across Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery Assess performance outcomes to measure and track progress

5 The National Preparedness Goal
A secure and resilient Nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk. Defined by the capability target measures of the core capabilities within the mission areas of prevent, protect, mitigate, respond, and recover

6 National Preparedness Goal Supporting Components
Core capabilities: Distinct highly interdependent elements necessary for our success Capability targets: Performance threshold(s) for each core capability that will guide our allocation of resources to support national preparedness Emphasis on whole community: Whole community includes all members of society, including individuals, communities, the private and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, and Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments The Goal seeks to enable the whole community to contribute to and benefit from national preparedness Strategic National Risk Assessment: In accordance with PPD-8, a Strategic National Risk Assessment was conducted The SNRA identified a wide range of threats and hazards that pose a significant risk to the nation, affirming the need for an all-hazards, capability-based approach to preparedness planning

7 Core Capabilities List
PREVENT PROTECT MITIGATE RESPOND RECOVER Planning Planning Planning Planning Planning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Forensics and Attribution Access Control and Identity Verification Community Resilience Critical Transportation Economic Recovery Intelligence and Information Sharing Cybersecurity Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction Environmental Response / Health and Safety Health and Social Services Interdiction and Disruption Intelligence and Information Sharing Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment Fatality Management Services Housing Screening, Search and Detection Interdiction and Disruption Threats and Hazard Identification Infrastructure Systems Infrastructure Systems Physical Protective Measures Mass Care Services Natural and Cultural Resources Risk Management for Protection Programs and Activities Mass Search and Rescue Operations On-Scene Security and Protection Screening, Search and Detection Operational Communications Supply Chain Integrity and Security Public and Private Services and Resources Public Health and Medical Services Situational Assessment

8 National Preparedness System Description Components
The National Preparedness System (NPS) description is comprised of six major components Identifying and Assessing Risk Estimating Capability Requirements Building and Sustaining Capabilities Planning to Deliver Capabilities Validating Capabilities Reviewing and Updating

9 Build and Sustain Preparedness
Comprised of four key elements… A comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness, to include public outreach and community-based and private-sector programs to enhance national resilience Federal preparedness Federal preparedness assistance (i.e., grants and technical assistance) National research and development efforts Activities for the effort to Build and Sustain Preparedness will begin shortly 1 yr 2 yrs 3 mo 6 mo 9 mo 15 mo 18 mo 21 mo PPD-8 Signed March 30, 2011 Ongoing

10 FY Year of Transition PL Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 For grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities, $1,349,681,000, which shall be distributed, according to threat, vulnerability, and consequence, at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security $675 M for Fire Fighter Assistance Grants (AFG & SAFER) $350 M for Emergency Management Performance Grants

11 FY11 & FY12 Funding Summary For Internal Use Only

12 FY 2012 – What’s New Alignment to National Preparedness Goal
Program by Mission Area Core Capabilities supported by program Program Priorities Sustainment of core capabilities at state/territory/regional/local/tribal level that can be considered national assets and deployable via intra and inter state mutual aid Emphasis on sustainment lifecycle (updated plans, refresher training and exercises, equipment maintenance and updates)

13 FY 2012 – What’s New Program Priorities – Cont’d
Mutual Aid agreements and EMAC membership (for states and territories) a requirement Building out new capabilities only when other core capabilities have been sustained Risk assessments drive prioritization of new capabilities FY 2011 performance measures carried into FY 2012 24 month period of performance

14 Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative
$8.3 Billion in unexpended grant funds from FY 2007 to FY 2011 Secretary’s Guidance to SAAs issued on February 13 Info Bulletin #379 issued by FEMA on February 17 implementing Secretary’s Guidance Expanded allowability to maximum permitted by 9/11 Act Streamlined waiver process Stricter period of performance extension criteria

15 FY 2013 – What’s Coming FY 2013 Budget includes $2.9 billion in grant funding Consolidates 16 other grants into the new, streamlined National Preparedness Grant Program (NPGP) Competitive, risk-based model Funding allocations based on prioritized core capabilities as well as comprehensive threat/risk assessments and gap analyses Each state and territory will receive a base level of funding allocated in accordance with a population driven formula

16 FY 2013 – What’s Coming Remainder of grant allocations determined competitively, based on criticality of specific capability according to regional threat/risk assessments and applicant’s ability to complete the project within two year period of performance NPGP will focus on: developing and sustaining core capabilities enhancing terrorism prevention and protection capabilities critical infrastructure/ key resource protection

17 State Administrative Agency (SAA)
Each State and territory has a governor appointed contact responsible for managing all GPD funds and associated program requirements The SAA should be the main point of contact as they are the initial recipient of most grant awards Colleges and Universities apply directly to FEMA for Fire Prevention and Safety Grants Colleges and Universities apply directly to FEMA for Fire Prevention and Safety Grants.

18 Allowable Funding Categories
Planning Training Exercises Equipment Organization – including personnel costs Management and Administration Construction – in selected programs Planning: Development and revision of EOPs Vulnerability assessments Citizen preparedness activities Agro-terrorism Training: Curriculum development Course delivery NIMS training Fire training Exercises: Planning Execution After action reports FP&S Prevention Grants Study - Fire Safety Solutions for People with Disabilities Study - Fire Safety Curriculum for Young Children 3 to 5 Years Old Study - Fire and Life Safety Educator Instructional Materials Study - Using Immersive Virtual Reality for Realistic Life-Size Fire Safety Training Provide dormitory residents with kitchen stove units equipped with new technology in an effort to reduce the number of unattended cooking incidents, Conduct "safety days" for on and off-campus students FP&S Research and Development: Stress and Overexertion Firefighter Monitoring Systems Testing Firefighter Protective Gloves Best Practices in Firefighting: An International Comparison and Evaluation

19 Allowable Equipment Categories
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Detection Equipment Decontamination Equipment Interoperable Communications Equipment Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment Explosive Device Mitigation and Remediation Equipment Physical Security Enhancement Equipment Medical Supplies/Pharmaceuticals CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles/ Aircraft/Watercraft CBRNE Search & Rescue Equipment CBRNE Reference Materials Agricultural Terrorism Prevention, Response & Mitigation Cyber Security Intervention Equipment Citizen Corps specific equipment Equipment: LE equipment Development of GIS systems Interoperable communications equipment CI/KR hardening Pharmaceutical stockpiling (university based hospitals) Public health surveillance systems

20 What Colleges/Universities Need to Do
Develop relationship with SAA, State EMA or UASI Read program guidance and application kits for grant programs at and to become familiar with program eligibility, program requirements and allowable expenditures Determine your needs or capabilities in relation to the various grant programs

21 Available Resources Centralized Scheduling & Information Desk (CSID) Help Line or Monday – Friday: 8 am – 6 pm (EST) Grant Programs Directorate FEMA Call Center: or FEMA Grants Web Page FEMA AFG Web Page Responder Knowledge Base – Authorized Equipment List

22 Contact Information C. Gary Rogers Senior Policy Advisor Grant Programs Directorate DHS/FEMA


Download ppt "Discussion Points PPD-8 – National Preparedness"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google