1. SEISMIC DILATOMETER EUROCODE 7 (1997). Standard Test Method, European Committee for Standardization Part 3: Design Assisted by Field Testing, Section 9: FLAT DILATOMETER TEST (DMT), 9 pp. TC16 (1997). “The DMT in soil Investigations”, a report by the ISSMGE Technical Committee tc16 ON Ground Property, Characterization from in-situ testing, 41 pp. ASTM (2002). Standard Test Method D6635-01, American Society for Testing and Materials The standard test method for performing the Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT), 14 pp. FLAT DILATOMETER

2. WAYS OF INSERTING THE BLADE “TORPEDO” INSERTION METHOD Pushed by truckPushed by a drill rig Driven by a drill rig Pushed from a fixed platform Driven by SPT Tripod Driven or pushed by a static/dynamic penetrometer Torpedo L  3 m

3. SDMT TEST RESULTS SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY Vs (m/s) Z A B C Po P1 P2 Gamma Sigma' Uo Id Kd Ed Ud Ko Ocr Phi M Cu D1 (m) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kN/m^3) (kPa) (kPa) (MPa) (Deg) (MPa) (kPa) DESCRIPTION 0.6 105 330 121 320 15.7 10 0 1.66 11.8 6.9 41 18.4 SANDY SILT 0.8 73 255 91 245 15.7 13 0 1.70 6.8 5.4 39 11.4 SANDY SILT 1.0 81 350 94 340 16.7 16 0 2.61 5.7 8.5 38 17.1 SILTY SAND 1.2 76 267 93 257 15.7 18 2 1.80 5.1 5.7 37 10.6 SANDY SILT 1.8 33 135 55 125 15.7 21 8 1.50 2.2 2.4 2.5 SANDY SILT 2.0 119 225 140 215 15.7 23 10 0.57 5.8 2.6 1.3 5.3 5.0 19 SILTY CLAY 2.2 117 201 140 191 15.7 24 12 0.40 5.4 1.8 1.2 4.7 3.3 18 SILTY CLAY 2.4 106 173 129 163 14.7 25 14 0.29 4.6 1.2 1.1 3.7 2.0 16 MUD 2.6 115 185 138 175 15.7 26 16 0.30 4.7 1.3 1.1 3.8 2.2 17 CLAY 2.8 112 178 135 168 14.7 27 18 0.28 4.4 1.1 1.0 3.4 1.9 16 MUD 3.0 111 177 134 167 14.7 28 20 0.28 4.1 1.1 1.0 3.1 1.8 15 MUD ………………………………….. 28.0 785 955 803 945 17.7 186 265 0.26 2.9 4.9 0.76 1.8 6.1 65 CLAY 28.2 795 915 816 905 16.7 187 267 0.16 2.9 3.1 0.77 1.8 3.8 66 CLAY 28.4 805 995 822 985 17.7 189 269 0.29 2.9 5.6 0.77 1.8 7.0 67 CLAY 28.6 800 985 817 975 17.7 190 271 0.29 2.9 5.5 0.76 1.8 6.7 66 CLAY 28.8 790 945 809 935 17.7 192 273 0.23 2.8 4.4 0.74 1.7 5.2 64 CLAY 29.0 790 955 808 945 17.7 193 275 0.26 2.8 4.7 0.73 1.7 5.6 64 CLAY 29.2 755 1070 766 1060 17.7 195 277 0.60 2.5 10.2 0.67 1.4 11.1 57 CLAYEY SILT 29.4 795 950 814 940 17.7 196 279 0.24 2.7 4.4 0.72 1.6 5.1 64 CLAY 29.6 850 1070 866 1060 17.7 198 281 0.33 3.0 6.7 0.77 1.8 8.4 71 SILTY CLAY 29.8 845 1015 863 1005 17.7 200 283 0.24 2.9 4.9 0.76 1.8 6.1 70 CLAY 30.0 890 1050 909 1040 17.7 201 284 0.21 3.1 4.6 0.81 2.0 5.9 77 CLAY LEGEND Z = Depth Below Ground Level Po,P1,P2 = Corrected A,B,C readings Id = Material Index Ed = Dilatometer modulus Ud = Pore Press. Index Gamma = Bulk unit weight Sigma' = Effective overb. Stress Uo = Pore pressure INTERPRETED PARAMETERS Phi = Safe floor value Friction Angle Ko = In situ earth press. coeff. M = Constrained modulus (at Sigma') Cu = Undrained shear strength Ocr = Overconsolidation ratio DMT TABULAR OUTPUT

4. DISTORTIONS IN CLAY SETTLEMENT PREDICTION Bullock & Failmezger (Porto 2004) CONE WEDGE

5. DETECTING SLIP SURFACES IN A SLOPE SLIDING 1 REMOULDING 2 RECONSOLIDATION 3 (NC STATE) INSPECT K D 4 PROFILE COMPACTION CONTROL DMT reflects more sensitively compaction benefits and modulus increase LIQUEFACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Seismicity of the areaa max / gKd,min Nonseismic/1.7 Low seismicity0.154.2 Average seismicity0.255.0 High seismicity0.355.5 Kd limits for safety vs liquefaction For magnitude = 7.5 earthquake  H RELAXATION BEHIND A LANDSLIDE  ’ Horizontal Stress kPa Absolute Elevations (m) Landslide in Milazzzo, Sicily 3 2 1 1 2 3 Depth Z(m) M DMT (kPa)

6. Cu comparisons Field Vane at Skeena Ontario Canada Mekechuk 1983 M comparisons National Site BOTHKENNAR UK Nash et al., Géotechnique, June 1995, p. 173 0 5 10 15 20 Z (m) kPa Z (m) A.G.I., 10 th ECSMFE Firenze 1991 Vol. 1, p. 37 National Site FUCINO ITALY Wong, J.T.F. & Dobie, M.J.D. 1990 Malaysian Clays Cu in Recife Clay – Brazil Univ. of Pernambuco Research Site 1 Coutinho et al., Atlanta ISC 1999 CONSTRAINED MODULUS M (MPa) Z (m) ONSOY Clay (NORWAY) Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (1986). "In Situ Site Investigation Techniques and interpretation for offshore practice" Report 40019-28 by S. Lacasse, Fig. 16a, 8 Sept 86 FAILMEZGER, 1999 SITES IN VIRGINIA, U.S.A. Geotechnical Research Center Kiso-Jiban Consultants Co., Tokyo M in Tokyo Bay Clay CONSTRAINED MODULUS M (MPa)

7. SDMT SISMOGRAMS AS RECORDEDRE-PHASED 9.0 9.5 Z (m) 10.0 10.5 11.0 12.5 11.5 12.0 13.0

8. SDMT REPEATABILITY Z [m]Vs [m/s] 10.0101 10.599 11.098 11.599100 12.09796 12.594 13.099 13.595 14.0103 14.5117 15.098 15.5115 16.0114 16.5113 17.0122123 17.5119 18.0128 18.5127 19.0125 19.5119 20.0124 Each Vs corresponds to a single blow of the hammer Differences of Vs: 1 m/s VALIDATION SDMT at FUCINO Research Site June 2004

9. DMT WORLD COMMUNITY NORTH AMERICA 1. GPE, Inc.- Mr. Paul Bullock Gainesville, FL 2. Schmertmann & Crapps, Inc.-Dr.John Schmertmann Gainesville, FL 3. Mobile Augers Ltd.-Mr. Nestor Zacharko Edmonton, ALBERTA 4. Site Investigation Services-Mr. John Hayes Peterborough, ONTARIO 5. Clarkson College-Dr. Ambin Huang Potsdam, NY 6. Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 7. Terra Technologies-Mr. Rick Klopp Richmond, TX 8. Ellis & Associates-Mr. Steve Weaver Jacksonville, FL 9. Colorado State University-Dr. John Nelson Fort Collins, CO 10. North Carolina State University-Dr. Roy Borden Raleigh, NC 11. National Research Council of Canada-Dr.J.M.Konrad Ottawa, ONTARIO 12. Carleton University-Prof.Gunther Bauer Ottawa, ONTARIO 13. Northwestern University-Dr. Ray Krizek Evanston, IL 14. Ground Engineering Inc.-Mr.John DeMonte St. Louis, MO 15. Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation-Mr. Ken Rush Harrisburg, PA 16. University of British Columbia-Dr. R. Campanella Vancouver, BRITISH COLUMBIA 17. Geotechnique Consultants-Mr. Jorge Pachas Irvine, CA 18. University of Florida / Geot.Eng.-Dr. David Bloomquist Gainesville, FL 19. Williams Earth Sciences, Inc.-Mr. Keith Bennett Clearwater, FL 20. University of Florida-Dr. Byron Ruth Gainesville, FL 21. Law Engineering-Mr. Chris Giese Chantilly, VA 22. Earth Engineering & Sciences, Inc.-Mr. Sam Gupta Baltimore, MD 23. Hogentogler & Co.-Mr. Tom Nolan Gaithersburg, MD 24. Ontario Hydro-Mr.Chris Cragg Toronto, ONTARIO 25. Dominion Soils Investigatation-Mr. Mike Fabius Thunder Bay, ONTARIO 26. Iowa State University-Dr. Richard Handy Ames, IA 27. Louisiana State University-Dr. Mehmet Tumay Baton Rouge, LA 28. California Polytechnic Institute-Dr. Jay Natale San Luis Obispo, CA 29. University of Texas-Dr. Ken Stokoe Austin, TX 30. University of Michigan-Dr. Roman Hryciw Ann Arbor, MI 31. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation-Mr. Jeffrey Farrar Denver, CO 32. Alabama Power Co.-Mr. Clayton Gore Birmingham, AL 33. University of New Hampshire-Dr. Jean Benoit Durham, NH 34. University of Wisconsin / Madison-Dr. Peter Bosscher Madison, WI 35. Florida DOT / District 3-Mr. William Knight Chipley, FL 36. Florida DOT / District 5-Mr. Tom Malerk Deland, FL 37. Dominion Soils Investigation-Mr. Tom O'Dwyer Windsor, ONTARIO 38. University of California / Berkeley Berkeley, CA 39. T.L.B. & Associates-Mr. Tom Brown Crofton, MD 40. University of North Carolina-Dr. Janardhan Charlotte, NC 41. Driggers Engineering & Testing-Mr. Jamie Driggers Clearwater, FL 42. ATEC & Associates-Mr. Andy Frank Marietta, GA 43. KCI Technologies-Mr. Jay Burtis Jessup, MD 44. Florida DOT / Research & Materials-Dr. Robert Ho Gainesville, FL 45. Florida DOT / District1-Ms. Terri Puckett Bartow, FL 46. University of Massachusetts-Dr. Alan Lutenegger Amherst, MA 47. Ardaman & Associates-Dr. Robert Martin Orlando, FL 48. Cornell University-Dr. Fred Kulhawy Ithaca, NY 49. Virginia Polytechnic Institute Blacksburg, VA 50. University of Nebraska-Dr. J.Benak Lincoln, NE 51. Pacific Gas & Electric-Mr. Bob McManus San Ramon, CA 52. LawEngineering-Mr. Kirk McIntosh Jacksonville, FL 53. Law Engineering-Mr. Steve Willenborg Atlanta, GA 54. University of Illinois Chicago, IL 55. Merlex Engineering Ltd.-Mr. Mike Merleau North Bay, ONTARIO 56. Maryland State Highway Admin.-Mr. Dan Sajedi Brooklandville, MD 57. Georgia Institute of Technology-Dr. Paul Mayne Atlanta, GA 58. VBI In-Situ TestingInc.-Mr. Virgil Baker Oakland, CA 59. Oklahoma DOT-Dr. James Nevels Oklahoma City, OK 60. Bucknell University-Dr. Jeffrey Evans Lewisburg, PA 61. Universal Engineering Sciences-Mr. Bruce Woloshin Orlando, FL 62. Alberta Transportation & Utilities-Dr. Vishnu Diyaljee Edmonton, ALBERTA 63. Geopac, Inc.-Mr. Jean-Francois Morel Boucherville, QUEBEC 64. Warren George, Inc.-Mr. Lowell Babb Jersey City, NJ 65. Florida DOT / District 2-Mr. Chandra Samakura Lake City, FL 66. Virginia Military Institute-Dr. Grigg Mullen Lexington, VA 67. Applied Research Associates-Mr. Jim Shinn South Royalton, VT 68. In-Situ Soil Testing L.C.-Mr. Roger Failmezger Alexandria, VA 69. Alston Associates Inc.-Mr. Colin Alston Markham, ONTARIO 70. F & ME Consultants Inc.-Mr. Zane Abernathy Columbia, SC 71. Agra Earth & Environmental Inc.-Dr. Wesley Spang Portland, OR 72. Atlanta Testing & Engineering Jacksonville, FL 73. TGC GEOTECNIA Mexico City, MEXICO 74. WRIGHT, PEDGETT & ASSOCIATES Mount Pleasant, SC OTHER COUNTRIES 1. PALER SA Montagnola, SWITZERLAND 2. L'AQUILA UNIVERSITY L'Aquila, ITALY 3. CAMBRIDGE INSITU Cambridge, ENGLAND 4. STUDIO GEOTECNICO ITALIANO Milan, ITALY 5. LICCA, INC. Caracas, VENEZUELA 6. RAYMOND INTERNATIONAL, UK London, ENGLAND 7. TERRAMONITORING Johannesburg, S.AFRICA 8. DR. ALVARO MILAN Pereira, COLOMBIA 9. CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS OBRAS PUBLICAS Madrid, SPAIN 10. PM INSITU TECHNIQUES Cambridge, ENGLAND 11. NORWEGIAN GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE Oslo, NORWAY 12. NORWEGIAN ROAD AUTHORITY Oslo, NORWAY 13. CHALMERS UNIVERSITY Goteborg, SWEDEN 14. NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE of THECNOLOGY Trondheim, NORWAY 15. NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE SINGAPORE 16. UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 17. VIAK AB CONSULTING ENGINEERS Goteborg, SWEDEN 18. GEOMECHANICA, S.A. Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL 19. ROAD CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY Melbourne, AUSTRALIA 20. BUILDING RES. ESTABLISHMENT (BRE) England, UK 21. FUGRO UK England, UK 22. DOUGLAS & PARTNERS Sydney, AUSTRALIA 23. GEOSTUDIO VICENZETTO SAS Padova, ITALY 24. TECNOSOL SPA Roma, ITALY 25. RADAELLI CASTELLOTTI SRL Segrate-Milano, ITALY 26. CONSONDA SPA Milano, ITALY 27. RODIO SPA Milano, ITALY 28. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE SNC Trento, ITALY 29. SOILTEST SNC Arezzo, ITALY 30. GEOTEST SRL Roma, ITALY 31. SOLISONDA Pescara, ITALY 32. ASIA - TECH ENGNG. CONSULTANTS INC. Taipei, TAIWAN ROC 33. BUNDESANSTALT FUR WASSERBAU Karlsruhe, WEST GERMANY 34. VIAK AB CONSULTING ENGINEERS Karlstad, SWEDEN 35. SWEDEN GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE Linkoping, SWEDEN 36. INDGEO srl Ravenna, ITALY 37. UNITED GEOTECH INC Taipei, TAIWAN 38. TRANSPORT & ROAD RES. LABORATORY Crowthorne, Berks, UK 39. KISO - JIBAN CONSULTANTS CO. LTD Tokio, JAPAN 40. INST. OF HARBOR & MARINE TECHNOL Taichung, TAIWANROC 41. INTERFIELD Sdn Ehd WEST MALAYSIA 42. INSTITUT FUR GEOTECHNIK Wien, AUSTRIA 43. KEDE Research Lab. Ministry Public Works Athens, GREECE 44. GRONDMECHANICA DELFT Delft, NETHERLANDS 45. SAN LIEN DEVELOPMENT CO. TAIWAN ROC 46. CENTRAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTIT. Roorkee, INDIA 47. GEOTECH AB Stockholm, SWEDEN 48. SOL-ESSAIS Colombes, FRANCE 49. A.S.T.E. Zwijnaarde, BELGIUM 50. KONSULTFORETAGET GF Goteborg, SWEDEN 51. STUMP BOHR AG Zurich, SWITZERLAND 52. OYO UK LTD Luton, UK 53. TECNOSUOLO SA Lugano, SWITZERLAND 54. STUDIO PETER FREY Zug, SWITZERLAND 55. I.G.T. OY Helsinki, FINLAND 56. KAWASAKIGEOL. ENGNG. CO. Osaka, JAPAN 57. SHIN POONG ENGNG. Seoul, KOREA 58. JACOBSSON & WIDMARK SWEDEN 59. INDIAN INST. OF TECHNOLOGY Kanpur, INDIA 60. CENTRAL SOIL & MAT. RES. STATION New Delhi, INDIA 61. HONG KONG UNIVERSITYCIV. ENG. HONG KONG 62. WARSAW UNIVERSITY Warsaw, POLAND 63. GEOCONSULT AB SWEDEN 64. UBA KONTROLL Lund, SWEDEN 65. INDUSTRIAL DE SONDEOS Madrid, SPAIN 66. GEORENT AB Solna, SWEDEN 67. GEOTEKO Warsaw, POLAND 68. PORT & HARBORRES. INST. MIN. TRANSP. JAPAN 69. HAMZA ASSOCIATES Cairo, EGYPT 70. SOIL & FOUNDATION SINGAPORE 71. GULF INSPECTION INTNL Kuwait City, KUWAIT 72. CICCOPN CENTRO FORMAÇAO S. Pedro de Avioso, PORTUGAL 73. ISRAELI STANDARD INSTITUTE TelAviv,ISRAEL 74. UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA Coimbra, PORTUGAL 75. KUWAIT UNIV. ENG.& PETROLEUM Safat, KUWAIT 76. DR. PRIVITERA GEOLOGISTS Catania, ITALY 77. REDOBRAS Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL 78. EARTH PRODUCTS CHINA Ltd HONG KONG 79. BUCHEL FRANZ AG Rebstein, SWITZERTLAND 80. ISOTOP Ltd Gedera, ISRAEL 81. PTS - PESQUISAS TECNOLOGICAS DO SOLO Sao Paulo, BRASIL 82. FUJII FOUNDATION DESIGN Matsue City, Schimane, JAPAN 83. SCHMIDT & Co.HONG KONG HONG KONG 84. CHINA RAILWAY SCIENT.RES. ACAD. NW Branch, CHINA 85. KOREAN AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY KOREA 86. GEOTER G. DIDASKALOU Thessaloniki, GREECE 87. BANGLADESH UNIV. of ENGNG & TECHNOLOGY Dhaka, BANGLADESH 88. CAIRO UNIV. FACULTY of ENGINEERING. Cairo, EGYPT 89. UNIVERSIDADE Federal PERNAMBUCO at RECIFE Pernambuco, BRAZIL 90. VIECO INGENIERIA DE SUELOS Medellin, COLOMBIA 91. CIVIL ENGNG. INSTITUTE OF CROATIA Zagreb, CROATIA 92. MS INSTRUMENTS SDN. BHD Selangor, MALAYSIA 93. UNIVERSIDAD MAYOR S. SIMON, LAB GEOTECNIA Cochabamba, BOLIVIA 94. PUC - RIO PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDADE CATOLICA Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL 95. UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA Minas Gerais, BRAZIL 96. MINISTRY OF FLEMISH COMMUNITY Zwijnarde, BELGIUM 97. DONG AH CONSULTANTS Pusan, KOREA 98. PROF. WOLSKI & ASOC. Warsaw, POLAND 99. NATIONAL CHIAO - TUNG UNIVERSITY TAIWAN 100. TAIWAN FORMOSA PLASTIC TAIWAN 101. EXPLORATION ASSOCIATES ENGLAND 102. DAMASCO PENNA ENG. ASSOCIADOS Sao Paulo, BRAZIL 103. ARCOS - Mr. Da Silva Belo Horizonte, BRAZIL 104. KOREAN HIGHWAY CORP. Seoul, KOREA 105. MONASH UNIVERSITY Clayton, AUSTRALIA 106. BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH INST. Cairo, EGYPT 107. HEBO Poznan Poznan, POLAND 108. I - GEOTEST Girona, SPAIN 109. UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASILIA Brasilia, BRAZIL 110. EPC Beijing Beijing, CHINA 111. EDILGEOSONDA Chieti, ITALY 112. UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATERINA Florianopolis, BRAZIL 113. GEOLOGICAL Geophisic Prospecting Catania, ITALY 114. TECNA Dr. Moretti Arezzo, ITALY 115. DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Taiwan, TAIPEI 116. GEO Ing. Taddei L'Aquila, ITALY 117. INGEOMINAS Bogotà, COLOMBIA 118. FFSS Ferrovie Stato. Lab mobile Indagini Geotecniche. Roma, ITALY 119. GEOSAN Istanbul, TURKEY 120. GEO LOGIC Bolzano, ITALY 121. GEOSTUDI Pomezia, ITALY 122. STUDIO GARASSINO Milano, ITALY 123. Dr. Lipari e Muratore Geologists Enna, ITALY 124. Dr. Trossero Geologist Torino, ITALY 125. UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Perth, AUSTRALIA 126. DONG CONSULTANTS Seoul, SOUTH KOREA 127. Dr. Lacava Geologist Potenza, ITALY 128. ICOSEM Trapani, ITALY 129. ACES - ARAB CENTER ENGINEER STUDIES Dubai, CENTER ARAB EMIRATS 130. Dr. Bartolucci Geologist Pescara, ITALY 131. LJUBLJANA UNIVERSITY Ljubljana, SLOVENIA 132. GEOTEST BRNO Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC 133. SACCHETTO S.P.G. Adria, ITALY 134. PARAHYANGAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY Bandung, INDONESIA 135. YOOKU ENGINEERING Seoul, KOREA 136. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCEAN TECHNOLOGY Chennai, INDIA 137. GEOINZENIRING Ljubljana, SLOVENIA 138. Dr. Balachowski Gdansk, POLAND 139. TIANJIN URBAN CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTE Tianjin, China 140. SAMSUNG CORPORATION Seoul, Korea 141. MCCONNELL CONSULTING PTY LTD Brisbane, Australia 142. GCT ALPHA - Dr. Peiffer Schoten, Belgium 143. MOTA-ENGIL S.A. Canelas, Portugal