Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byShawna Crafts Modified over 3 years ago

1
Simulations of ‘Bottom-up’ Fill in Via Plating of Semiconductor Interconnects Uziel Landau 1, Rohan Akolkar 1, Eugene Malyshev 2, and Sergey Chivilikhin 2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH 44106 and 2 L-Chem, Inc Beachwood, OH 44122

2
Outline Significance and Objectives Significance and Objectives Parameters Controlling the Bottom-Up Fill Parameters Controlling the Bottom-Up Fill Simulation Method Simulation Method Sample Simulations Sample Simulations Conclusions Conclusions

3
Prior Work Andricacos, Uzoh, Dukovic, Horkans and Deligianni, IBM J. R&D 1998: -Additives blocking model -Adjustable Parameters + steady-state additives diffusion Georgiadou, Veyret, Sani and Alkire, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001: -Convective flow + additives transport Cao, Taephaisitphongse, Chalupa and West, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2001: -Diffusion controlled additives transport + adsorption isotherms Josell, Baker, Witt, Wheeler and Moffat, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2002: -Curvature enhanced SPS coverage

4
Objectives Develop a Simulation for the Bottom-Up Fill Develop a Simulation for the Bottom-Up Fill Based on Experimental Data Based on Experimental Data Without Adjustable Parameters & Without Invoking Extreme Assumptions Without Adjustable Parameters & Without Invoking Extreme Assumptions Simulation should correlate experimental Simulation should correlate experimental observations observations

5
Gap-Fill Modes Bottom-up Fill (Good!) Pinch Conventional Plating (unacceptable) Seam Conformal Plating ( unacceptable)

6
Seam Void Fill ~ 2.5 min ~ 50 sec ~ 30 sec ‘Conventional’ Plating Conformal Plating Bottom-up Plating Stages in ‘Gap-Fill’

7
Variable Adsorption leads to Variable Kinetics and to ‘Bottom-up’ fill: Suppressor, e.g. PAG Slow deposition Fast deposition ‘Enhancer’, e.g. Organic di-sulfide

8
Variable Deposition Rates Due to Non-uniform Inhibition i [mA/cm 2 ] V Polarization Curves Enhanced Kinetics (via) Suppressed Kinetics (‘flat’ wafer) 10 300 mV 100

9
< 50 Sec 2-3 Min Rapid Fill of Vias and Trenches

10
Nernst-Plank Equation (ionic transport): Navier-Stokes Equation (fluid-flow–momentum balance): C (Boundary Layer) Transport Equations -- Electroneutrality: Z j C j = 0 Pseudo Steady -State Diffusion Electric Migration Convection

11
Scaling Analysis of the Nernst Plank Equation*: Diffusion Electric Migration CbCb 2 = 0 Thin boundary layer Boundary conditions: Electrode: = V – E 0 – η a – η C Insulator: i = 0 (i = - κ ) = 0 Ohmic Control on the Macro-Scale Thin Boundary Layer Approximation 2 = 0 (Laplace’s eqn. for the potential is solved within the cell) * U. Landau, The Electrochem. Soc. Proceedings Volume 94-9, 1994.

12
Scaling Analysis of the Nernst Plank Equation*: Diffusion Electric Migration CbCb 2 = 0 Mass Transport Control on the Micro-Scale 2 C = 0 (Laplace’s eqn. for the Concentration, solved in the boundary layer) Boundary conditions: Electrode: η C = V – E 0 – η a - outer edge of diffusion layer: y = C = C B Insulator: i = 0 (i = - κ ) C = 0 * U. Landau, The Electrochem. Soc. Proceedings Volume 94-9, 1994. Boundary layer

13
The Software Package ‘ Cell-Design’ Features: Current Distribution + Fluid Flow (BEM + FD) Current Distribution: (BEM) Macro-scale: Micro-scale: Moving boundaries Variable Kinetics Fluid-Flow (FD): Complete solution of the Navier-Stokes equation Integrated with the electrochemical modeling Solution of the Nernst-Plank equation Export C Fast, Robust, Menu driven 2 C = 0 2 = 0 Boundary Element (BEM) Finite Differences (FD)

14
Simulation of Deposit Propagation Variable kinetics + Moving boundaries 2 =0 2 C =0 i = f ( η) Passivated kinetics (PEG+SPS) [Measured, f(t)] Accelerated kinetics (SPS) Variable kinetics [Partially passivated, f(t)] Virtual electrode; Outer edge of diffusion layer CC

15
Flow Simulations 60 RPM + 4 GPM Impinging Flow Wafer Scale ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations

16
Flow Simulations Micro-Scale Transport within the via is due to diffusion ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations

17
Concentration Map

18
Activation Overpotential, a, [V] i [mA/cm 2 ] SPS (Stagnant) PEG (Stagnant) Steady-State Polarization Data

19
Initial state Polarization Transients: PEG + SPS 50 s 20 s 10 sec 0 sec (PEG) SPS Steady- state Time

20
Fast PEG transport to upper via sidewalls Slow PEG transport to the via-bottom PEG Penetration Depth Short time SPS coverage Short time PEG coverage

21
Fast PEG transport to upper via sidewalls Slow PEG transport to the via-bottom PEG Penetration Depth Longer time PEG coverage Longer time SPS coverage Slow SPS depolarization

22
SiO 2 2 sec 4 sec 8 sec 12 sec 16 sec 24 sec 32 sec 40 sec 44 sec Electrolyte 47 sec ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations Via Fill Simulation Fill Time: 47 sec. Overpotential: - 124 mV Bottom: i = 60 mA/cm 2 i 0 = 1.12 mA/cm 2 C = 0.83 Top & Sidewalls: i = 0.24 mA/cm 2 3.4 mA/cm 2 Depolarization by SPS: i 0 = 3.1 μA/cm 2 46 μA/cm 2 C = 0.9

23
SiO 2 Electrolyte 2 sec 6 sec 16 sec 32 sec 10 sec 22 sec 42 sec 50 sec ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations Via Fill Simulation Fill Time: 49 sec. Overpotential: - 124 mV Bottom: i = 60 mA/cm 2 i 0 = 1.12 mA/cm 2 C = 0.83 Top & Sidewalls: i = 0.24 mA/cm 2 6.8 mA/cm 2 Depolarization by SPS: i 0 = 3.1 μA/cm 2 92 μA/cm 2 C = 0.9

24
SiO 2 Electrolyte ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations SiO 2 Electrolyte 1 sec time intervals Variable Kinetics along the Sidewalls Via Fill Simulation Fill Time: 48 sec. Overpotential: - 124 mV Bottom: i = 60 mA/cm 2 i 0 = 1.12 mA/cm 2 C = 0.83 Top: i = 0.24 mA/cm 2 3.4 mA/cm 2 Depolarization by SPS: i 0 = 3.1 μA/cm 2 46 μA/cm 2 C = 0.9 Sidewalls: Interpolated kinetics between Top and Bottom

25
SiO 2 Electrolyte Seam ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations Via Fill Simulation Plating Time: ~147 sec. Overpotential: - 80 mV Bottom: i = 10 mA/cm 2 i 0 = 1.12 mA/cm 2 C = 0.83 Top: i = 0.05 mA/cm 2 4.8 mA/cm 2 High Depolarization by SPS: i 0 = 3.1 μA/cm 2 0.28 mA/cm 2 C = 0.9 Sidewalls: Interpolated kinetics between Top and Bottom Current density has been lowered: No Bottom-Up Fill No Bottom-Up Fill 1 sec time intervals

26
Deposit Propagation in Feature Clusters and Wide Features Flat regions - Passivated: i 0 =5x10 -4 A/cm 2 A c Bottom – Pure copper: i 0 =10 -3 A/cm 2 A c Side-walls - interpolated Cluster Wide Feature ‘Cell-Design’ Simulations

27
Conclusions Simulation of bottom-up fill has been carried w/o invoking arbitrary assumptions Simulation of bottom-up fill has been carried w/o invoking arbitrary assumptions Simulation is based on, and implements ‘variable‘ kinetics = f(time, position) Simulation is based on, and implements ‘variable‘ kinetics = f(time, position) A commercial CAD program that accomodates moving boundaries and variable kinetics was used A commercial CAD program that accomodates moving boundaries and variable kinetics was used Different process parameters have been explored: Different process parameters have been explored: Transport and adsorption kinetics of inhibiting and depolarizing additives must match process Operating conditions (i, V) must be within range

28
Acknowledgements Yezdi Dordi – Applied materials Yezdi Dordi – Applied materials Peter Hey – Applied Materials Peter Hey – Applied Materials Andrew Lipin – L-Chem Andrew Lipin – L-Chem

29
Thank you for your attention

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

FEM FOR HEAT TRANSFER PROBLEMS

FEM FOR HEAT TRANSFER PROBLEMS

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on high voltage engineering books Ppt on transportation in human body Ppt on allotropes of carbon free download Ppt on solid dielectrics definition Ppt on success and failure stories Writing process elementary ppt on cells Free download ppt on green revolution Ppt on sanskritization Ppt on environmental chemistry Ppt on media law in india