3. PRESENTATION CONTENT  Observations  Integrate Development Planning  In-depth Analysis of available data  Overview of the Analysis Phase of the IDP process  Percentage indicators used in Free State  Indicators from Census 2011 as primary source of data  Conclusion

4. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS The following observations are made with regard to some IDPs: The documents cover different financial years. Therefore the contexts and circumstances differ. The IDPs do not provide enough statistical information to substantiate the claims that have been made in the documents. The qualitative AND quantitative analysis of the IDPs is very shallow. Documents simply mention some areas as being problematic without providing context and explanation to justify the claim. Indicators are not standardised nor classified in such a way that relevant outputs can be linked to outcomes. This leads to difficulty in implementing monitoring and evaluation (M&E)) Insufficient data to support the development of plans

5. INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING  Integrated Development Planning is an approach to planning that involves the entire municipality and its citizens in finding the best solutions to achieve good long- term development.  An Integrated Development Plan is a super plan for an area that gives an overall framework for development. It aims to co-ordinate the work of local and other spheres of government in a coherent plan to improve the quality of life for all the people living in an area.

6. INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Before starting the planning, an IDP Process Plan must be drawn up. This plan is meant to ensure the proper management of the planning process. The process undertaken to produce the IDP consists of 5 phases:  PHASE 1: ANALYSIS (Stats SA)  PHASE 2: STRATEGIES  PHASE 3: PROJECTS  PHASE 4: INTEGRATION  PHASE 5: APPROVAL

7. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF DATA In-depth analysis provides an overall spatial picture of the municipality in terms of the current situation, patterns and trends within the municipal area. Information gathering should be focused on the implications for the development of the municipality area. The information should be systematically unpacked around key sectors: –Bio-physical [geology, soil and climate] –Socio-economic [people and economy] –Built environment [housing, sewerage, transport]

8. ANALYSIS MATRIX. Communities Bio-Physical Environment Built Environment Socio/Economic Environment Energy Telecoms Solid Waste Sewerage Water Supply Housing Transport Urban Settlement Agriculture Mining Vegetation Topography Hydrology Climate Geology & Soils Land Reform Tourism Investment Economics Income & Poverty Crime Employment Education Growth trends Demography

9. Components of the Matrix BUILT ENVIRONMENTSOCIO-ECONOMICBIO-PHYSICAL Energy Telecoms Sound waste Sewerage Water Supply Housing Transport Urban Settlement Land reform Tourism Investments Economy Income & Poverty Crime Employment Health Education Growth trends Demography Agriculture Mining Vegetation Topography Hydrology Climate Geology & Soil BUILT ENVIRONMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT BIO-PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Energy Telecoms Sound waste Sewerage Water Supply Housing Transport Urban Settlement Land reform Tourism Investments Economy Income & Poverty Crime Employment Health Education Growth trends Demography Agriculture Mining Vegetation Topography Hydrology Climate Geology & Soil

10. OVERVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS PHASE OF THE IDP In-depth analysis of Priority Issues:  Municipality-level Analysis  Economic Analysis  Environmental Analysis  Institutional Analysis  Spatial Analysis  Socio-economic Analysis

11. DETAILS OF ANALYSIS PHASE

12. Migration 12 Development

13. IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT 13

14. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT Age Sex Size Spatial Distribution Movement

15. SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLITICAL SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL ECONOMIC EVIRONMENTAL DEMOGRAPHIC Role of the state Democratic institutions Participatory planning Urban fiscal base Access to adequate income Basic needs Human rights Fertility Migration Ethnicity Sustainable use of renewable resources Minimal use of non-renewable resources Appropriate physical planning

16. PERCENTAGE OF SOCIO- DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS USED IN FREE

17. IDP Indicators used – FS District and Metro

18. IDP Sources used – FS District and Metro

19. Number of Indicators within Municipalities

20. WHAT CENSUS 2011 PROVIDES

21. CATEGORIES OF INDICATORS FROM CENSUS 2011 INDICATOR CATEGORYQUESTIONS Section A: Demographics 6 Section B: Migration 13 Section C: General Health and Functioning2 Section D: Parental Survival and Income5 Section E: Education6 Section E: Employment13 Section G: Fertility10 Section H: Housing, Household Services and Agriculture20 Section I: Mortality in the Last 12 Months10 TOTAL85

22. DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES FROM CENSUS 2011 INDICATORMEANING IMPLICATION FOR ANALYSIS Date of birth This questions seeks to determine the date in which the responded was respondent born Population size and spatial distribution by administrative unit and locality Relationship This questions seeks to determine the relationship of the respondent to the head of the household Socio-cultural characteristics of the population (ethnic group, language, religion, etc.) Marital Status This questions seeks to determine the marital status of the respondent Reproductive behaviour patterns of the population (fertility, contraceptive practice, family size, household size and composition, etc.) Spouse or Partner This questions seeks to determine who in the household is the spouse or partner Reproductive behaviour patterns of the population (fertility, contraceptive practice, family size, household size and composition, etc.) Population Group This questions seeks to determine the population group of the respondent Socio-cultural characteristics of the population (ethnic group, language, religion, etc.) LanguageThis questions seeks to determine the language of the respondent Socio-cultural characteristics of the population (ethnic group, language, religion, etc.)

23. OTHER SOURCES OF DATA e.g. schools

24. SECONDARY DATA FROM EMIS DATABASE

26. CONCLUSIONS There is a challenge in making comparisons between metropolitan and district municipalities. This is because of the sheer size and different levels of complexity between them. The Analysis Phase is the most critical area in the IDP development The prerequisite for success in this area is to find relevant data Stats SA provide primary data but there is also secondary data in the form of administrative data It is recognised that necessary skills are required in this area There a number of training programs in place. What is required is alignment and partnerships

27. Government has committed large sums of funds for infrastructure development. Minister of Finance Pravin Gordhan in his National Budget Speech 2013 said R827 billion on infrastructure projects over the next three years is to be drawn from the fiscus and state- owned enterprises. How to plan for this properly Andreu (1998) speaks of the TUNNEL EFFECT of contemporary networked infrastructure – the way and infrastructure can traverse space for those using it whilst simultaneously excluding those who inhabit the immediate geographical environment Graham, S (2000) ) “Introduction: cities and infrastructure networks”

28. THANK YOU Thank you!