Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 University Services Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 University Services Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow."— Presentation transcript:

1 Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 University Services Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow

2 Purpose of GU 2012 Staff Survey 1. To measure: – Staff Involvement – Staff Commitment – Staff Wellbeing 2. To determine: – Actions for building on favourable findings – Actions for addressing weaknesses 3. Where possible, to compare with 2009 survey findings – To look for continuous improvement Restructure has limited 2009 2012 comparison Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

3 GU Response Rates by College/US Population as at March 2012 – Base: 5,144; reduced from 6,056 to exclude: invigilators; adult education lecturers; tutors etc – Response: 1,780 (33%) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services CollegeResponsePopulationResp. Rate 01.Arts14736940% 02.MVLS508173929% 03.Science & Eng23183528% 04.Soc Sc19653237% 05.University Services643196633% 99.Not Disclosed55-- University Total1780544133%

4 GU Response Rates by Gender & Job Family CategoryResponsePopulationResp. Rate Male694250228% Female966293933% Not Disclosed120-- University Total1780544133% 1. R&T628211630% 2. MPA740157447% 3. Tech12552924% 4. Ops18194819% 5. Clinical3027411% 99.Not Disclosed55-- University Total1780544133% Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

5 University Services – Response by Service Area 1 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services Service AreaSample nPopulation N% response Campus Services 16572723 Corp Comms 82236 DAO 112544 E & B 2414117 Finance 328538 HSW 72035 HR 183847 IT 4216825 LTS 1133

6 University Services – Response by Service Area 2 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services Service AreaSample nPopulation N% response Library 6022227 Hunterian 1133 RIO 3113623 R & E 102148 Stud Services 5118428 Other 3811035 Not Disclosed 124

7 US Response by Gender & Job Family Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services Univ ServicesResponsePopulationResp. Rate Male24582430% Female370114232% Not Disclosed28-- US Total643196633% R&T1410613% MPA40489145% Tech299232% Ops175877- Clinical0-- Not Disclosed21-- US Total643196633%

8 10 question items used as GU KPIs Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services KPI Question ItemMeasure (%) KPI 1: Understanding of team aimsVG + Good + Satis KPI 2: Understanding of performance expectationsVG + Good + Satis KPI 3: How often praised for a job well doneAt least 6 monthly KPI 4: How often do you discuss with manager how to improve working practices At least annually KPI 5: How often given performance feedbackat least annually KPI 6: How good are communications within your work teamEx + Good + Satis KPI 7: how good are communications with other teams in School/RI/SEx + Good + Satis KPI 8: How well are GU-wide changes communicated?Ex + Good + Satis KPI 9: I enjoy working in the UniversityStr Agree + Agree KPI 10: I feel loyal and supportive to the UniversityStr Agree + Agree

9 Average of all GU KPIs 1-10 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services **Heterosexual/straight and LGBT, as worded in the questionnaire *Disability Reported or No Disability Reported

10 Average of all US KPIs 1-10 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

11 KPI 1: Understanding of team aims (VG + G +S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

12 KPI 2: Understanding of performance expectations (VG + G +S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

13 KPI 3: How often praised for a job well done (at least 6-monthly) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

14 KPI 4: How often discuss working practice (at least annually) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

15 KPI 5: How often given performance feedback (at least annually) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

16 KPI 6: How good are communications within work team (Ex + G + Satis) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

17 KPI 7: How good are communications with other School/RIs? (E+G+S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

18 KPI 8: How well are GU-wide changes communicated? (Ex + G + Satis) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

19 KPI 9: I enjoy working in the University (SA + A) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

20 KPI 10: I feel loyal and supportive to the University (SA + A) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services

21 HSE Stress Measurement Tool - Findings

22 HSE UK benchmark for work-related stress Classifications are derived from HSE survey of 136 UK organisations (2004-10), using their methodology – 35 questions measure 7 key work design factors – scored 1-5; 5 is least stress HSE traffic light scoring scheme for 7 factors Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services ColourCommentRange of UK benchmark Doing very well - need to maintain performanceAt or above 80 th percentile Good, but need for improvement. 50 th - 80 th percentile Clear need for improvement.20 th – 50 th percentile Urgent action neededBelow 20 th percentile

23 HSE benchmark factors for work-related stress Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services RedYellowAquaGreen Factor (stressor) Less thanBetween Greater than 1. Demands: workload, work patterns and the work environment 2.942.94 - 3.103.10 - 3.293.29 2. Control: how much say staff have in the way they do their work 3.223.22 - 3.473.47 - 3.723.72 3. Support: encouragement, sponsorship, resources provided by: a. The organisation and line management 3.273.27 - 3.463.46 - 3.653.65 b. Colleagues 3.633.63 - 3.783.78 - 3.893.89 4. Relationships: promoting positive working to avoid conflict and dealing with unacceptable behaviour 3.613.61 - 3.853.85 - 4.044.04 5. Role: whether staff understand role within organisation and whether the organisation ensures they do not have conflicting roles 4.044.04 - 4.184.18 - 4.314.31 6. Change: how organisational change (large or small) is managed and communicated in the organisation 2.792.79 - 3.043.04 - 3.243.24

24 HSE Scores: GU2012 by Gender, Job Family Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services Notes Stress FactorGU2012GU MGU F1.R&T2.MPA3.Tech4.Ops5.Clinic 1.Demands3.043.033.102.653.183.433.622.82 2.Control3.263.283.27 3.263.223.21 3a.Managers' Support2.872.882.852.832.802.813.322.76 3b.Peer Support2.652.712.582.572.522.593.502.42 4.Relationships3.763.793.753.743.733.753.923.77 5.Role4.15 4.204.014.214.264.474.13 6.Change3.063.102.963.292.892.743.162.81

25 HSE Scores for University Services Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - University Services Stress FactorGU20125.US 1.Demands3.043.37 2.Control3.263.25 3a.Managers' Support2.872.97 3b.Peer Support2.652.82 4.Relationships3.763.77 5.Role4.154.27 6.Change3.063.00


Download ppt "Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 University Services Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google