Download presentation
1
Quantitative Microscopy
and Micro-CT by Kimerly A. Powell, Ph.D. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 1
2
Quantitative microscopy
3
Objective To determine the quantitative morphometrics (i.e., number, size, orientation) of biological structures (i.e., cells, cell nuclei, collagen fibers) in an automated unbiased fashion.
4
Feature Analysis – Rat Tendon Collagen Fibrils
Number fibrils = 247 Mean (s.d.) Area = (791.6) nm Range Area = [ ] nm Mean (s.d.) Diameter = (57.0) nm Range Diameter = [ ] nm
5
Mouse Alveolar Septae Width
EDM image MAT overlayed EDM Histogram mean half-width = 8.3 (0.03) pixels mean width = 11.5 microns
6
Mouse Bone Stem Cells – Colony Proliferation
Ncells = 189, 1.02 mm2, 10.2% density Ncolonies = 10
7
Colony Statistics for Plating Density of 2 x 106 (n=12 chambers)
Mouse Bone Stem Cells Colony Statistics for Plating Density of 2 x 106 (n=12 chambers) WT KO Number Colonies 168 (35) 82 (37) Number Cells/colony 71 (102) 56 (133) Size Colony (mm2) 0.214 (0.343) 0.161 (0.343) Cell Density (%) 15.6 (6.7) 17.0 (8.5) AP- Pos Staining (%) 32.7 (23.7) 22.8 (24.1)
8
Introduction - Micro-CT Imaging
Micro-CT is a high resolution version of X-ray tomographic imaging (resolution = microns). It has primarily been used to image ex vivo bone core specimens. And more recently been used to image various bone structures in vivo in small animal models.
9
Introduction –Micro-CT Imaging
Detector X-ray source Object rotates increased scanning speed more efficient use of x-rays reduced dose Cone-Beam Micro-CT
10
CCF Micro-CT Imaging System
X-ray Source Rotational Stage Image Intensifier & CCD camera 4 micron spot size X-ray kV, mA 3-field II (5, 7, 9 inch FOV) 2k x 2k 12-bit CCD camera 7 - axis positioning system
11
Micro-CT Imaging Applications
Bone trabecular morphometry iliac crest, calcaneous, femoral head Tissue engineering Bone density and location of new bone formation in HA and PCL bone tissue scaffolds In-vivo small animal imaging Longitudinal evaluation of callus and bone volume in in vivo bone fracture/healing model Mouse Phenotyping Morphometric analysis of skeletal structure in metalloprotease knockout mice
12
Small Animal Imaging
13
Fracture Model - Image Acquisition
x-ray source detector resolution = 100 mm Hind limbs secured in micro-CT system Projection radiograph
14
Fracture Model – 3D Reconstructions
B C osteotomies Left leg Right leg
15
Fracture Model – Spatial Registration
Unregistered Registered Segment bone – global threshold Find outer outlines ICP registration reference – prinicpal axis week 0 ROI Red = week 0 Yellow = week 5
16
Fracture Model - Morphometrics
17
Fracture Model - Morphometrics
B C D E F Week 0 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
18
Fracture Model - Results Table 1. Normalized Bone Volume
Weeks Post-Surgery Number Samples Mean Standard Deviation 18 1.00 0.00 1 1.13 0.04 2 1.22 0.08 3 16 1.21 0.09 4 1.20 0.10 5 14 1.24 0.07
19
Fracture Model - Results Table 2. Normalized Callus Volume
Weeks Post-Surgery Number Samples Mean Standard Deviation 18 0.00 1 0.16 0.08 2 0.49 0.18 3 16 0.23 4 0.42 5 14 0.41 0.04
20
Trabecular Architecture – In vivo imaging
Trabecular morphometry Treatment therapies - PtH Proximal tibia rat
21
Mouse Phenotyping
22
Mouse Phenotyping E18.5 WT mouse
23
Application – Embryonic Development
E18.5 in ethanol Alizarin red/Alcian Blue after staining
24
Application – Embryonic Development
25
Application – Embryonic Development
26
Soft Tissue Micro-CT Imaging – Rat Embryo (E18)
cut plane heart liver intestines Side view Front view
27
Ex vivo Micro-CT Imaging of Mouse Skulls
2 week old Wild Type 2 week old MMP-14 KO
28
Inner canthal Distance
Application – Skull Morphometry WT MMP14-KO Skull Length 15.6 mm 11.5 mm Skull Width 8.5 mm 7.3 mm Nose Length 10.2 mm 7.4 mm Inner canthal Distance 4.5 mm 3.8 mm Upper Jaw (left) 9.7 mm 6.6 mm Upper Jaw (right) 9.8 mm 6.8 mm Lower Jaw (left) 4.9 mm Lower Jaw (right) 7.3 4.9
29
Application – Skull Morphometry
Procrustes Analysis: 3D Landmark Data Separates Size from Shape 3D reconstruction rat skull
30
Application – Skull Morphometry
Foramen Magnum Inner Ear Teeth and pallette M I S
31
Application – Vertebral Morphometry
Segment bone Label separate objects Separate ‘touching’ objects Make linear and volumetric measurements on separated objects S1 S2 S3 Sacral spine of 2-week old WT mouse
32
Application – Vertebral Morphometry
S2 S2 Spinous process verterbal foramen articular process transverse process 2 week old Wild Type 2 week old MMP-14 KO
33
Application – Vertebral Morphometry – S2
WT (n=4) MMP14-KO (n=4) Transverse Process 3.95 (0.11) 4.00 (0.38) Articular Process 1.54 (0.17) 2.51 (0.27) Spinous Process 2.11 (0.06) - Foramen Height 1.10 (0.03) 1.25 (0.09) Foramen Width 1.27 (0.16) 2.03 (0.13) Body Height 1.11 (0.02) 0.84 (0.08) Body Width 1.38 (0.06) 1.66 (0.14) Body Depth 2.07 (0.05) 1.49 (0.16)
34
Application – Tibia Morphometry
secondary center of ossification growth plate trabeculae Internal micro-architecture of 2 week old mouse tibia resolution = 15 microns
35
Application – Skeletal Atlas
Automatically label individual bones in skeleton Standardize measurements for individual bones
36
Application – Mouse Histology
37
Acknowledgements Collaborators: Barry Kuban, B.S.
Larry Latson, M.S. Craig Bennetts B.S. BME Prototype Lab Jason Bryan (OSC) Collaborators: Suneel Apte, MBBS D. Phil. Ron Midura, Ph.D. George Muschler, M.D. Don Stredney (OSC) NIH DOD
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.