Presentation on theme: "Behavioral and Experimental Economics"— Presentation transcript:
1Behavioral and Experimental Economics Heuristics and BiasesBehavioral and Experimental Economics
2Making Decisions under Uncertainty Many decisions are based on beliefs concerning the likelihood of uncertain events…Who will win the election? How will a $ trade for a € tomorrow? Is the defendant guilty?What determines such beliefs?How do people assess the probability of an uncertain event or the value of an uncertain quantity?
3We Use HeuristicsWe reduce the complex tasks of assessing probabilities and predicting values to simpler judgmental operations.Resembles the subjective assessment of physical quantities such as distance or size.Example of how we judge the distance of an object using clarity. The more sharply the object is seen, the closer it appears to be. This is mostly right but subject to systematic errors.Distances are often overestimated when visibility is poor because the contours of objects are blurred. On the other hand, distances are often underestimated when visibility is good because the objects are seen sharply. Thus the reliance on clarity as an indication of distance leads to common biases.
4Introduction What is a heuristic? Why do humans use them? Do heuristics help or hurt human decision making?
5Definition from Wikipedia Heuristic ( /hjʉˈrɪstɨk/; or heuristics; Greek: "Εὑρίσκω", "find" or "discover") refers to experience-based techniques for problem solving, learning, and discovery. Heuristic methods are used to speed up the process of finding a satisfactory solution, where an exhaustive search is impractical. Examples of this method include using a "rule of thumb", an educated guess, an intuitive judgment, or common sense.In more precise terms, heuristics are strategies using readily accessible, though loosely applicable, information to control problem solving in human beings and machines.
6Kahneman and Tversky"Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases," Science,1974.James Monitier “Behaving Badly,” 2/2006.
7Source of BiasThis seminal article by Tversky and Kahneman describes three Heuristics people rely on to assess probabilities and predict values:RepresentativenessAvailabilityAdjustment and Anchoring
8RepresentativenessMany of the probabilistic questions with which people are concerned belong to one of the following types:1. What is the probability that object A belongs to class BOR2. What is the probability that process B will generate event A
9To answer we rely on Representativeness Heuristic Probabilities are evaluated by the degree to which A is representative of B…In other words, the degree to which A resembles BIs A similar to B?
102) Linda works in a bank and is active in the feminist movement ExampleLinda is 31 years old. She is single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and equality.Which is more likely?What do you think?1) Linda works in a bank2) Linda works in a bank and is active in the feminist movement
11It is more likely that Linda works in a bank. RepresentativenessIt is more likely that Linda works in a bank.To argue that (2) is more likely is to commit a conjunction fallacy.Tversky & Kahneman (1983)Bankers85% of professional fund managers chose (1)Feminist BankersFeminists
12RepresentativenessSource of the error?The Representative Heuristic (rule of thumb)People base judgments on how things appear rather than how statistically likely they are.People are driven by the narrative of the description rather than by the logic of the analysis.
13Representativeness"The best explanation to date of the misperception of random sequences is offered by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, who attribute it to people’s tendency to be overly influenced by judgments of “representativeness.”Representativeness can be thought of as the reflexive tendency to assess the similarity of outcomes, instances, and categories on relatively salient and even superficial features, and then to use these assessments of similarity as a basis of judgment.We expect instances to look like the categories of which they are members; thus, we expect someone who is a librarian to resemble the prototypical librarian. We expect effects to look like their causes; thus we are more likely to attribute a case of heartburn to spicy rather than bland food, and we are more inclined to see jagged handwriting as a sign of a tense rather than a relaxed personality.“ Gilovich (1991), page 18
14Example: Steve“Steve is very shy and withdrawn, invariably helpful, but with little interest in people, or in the world of reality. A meek and tidy soul, he has a need for order and structure, and a passion for detail.”
15Farmer Salesman Airline pilot Librarian physician Order the following occupations in terms of the probability in which Steve is engaged in themFarmerSalesmanAirline pilotLibrarianphysician
16People order by probability and similarity in exactly the same way Problem: similarity, or representativeness, is not influenced by several factors that SHOULD affect judgments of probability
17Our Insensitivities1. Insensitivity to prior probability or outcomes: what is the base-rate frequency of the outcomes?The fact that there are many more farmers than librarians in the popn should enter into any reasonable estimate of the probability that Steve is a librarian rather than a farmer
18ExampleSubjects shown brief personality descriptions of several individualsSubjects asked to assess, for each description, the prob that it belonged to an engineer rather than a lawyerIn one experimental condition, subjects were told that the descriptions had been drawn from a sample of 70 engineers and 30 lawyersIn another condition, 30 engineers and 70 lawyers
19Bayes’ RuleThe odds that any particular description belongs to an engineer rather than to a lawyer should be higher in this condition, where there is a majority of engineers!(.7/.3)^2 = 5.44In violation of Bayes’ rule, the subjects in the two conditions produced essentially the same probability judgments.People ignored the math and looked only at the representativeness!
20Evidence, No Evidence, Worthless Evidence When given no other information, subjects used the prior probabilities (evidence)Evidence ignored when given a description + evidenceEvidence ALSO ignored when given a useless description
21Useless Description“Dick is a 30 year old man. He is married with no children. A man of high ability and high motivation, he promises to be quite successful in his field. He is well liked by his colleagues.”
22Insensitivity 2 2. Insensitivity to sample size Example: What is the average height of the following group of men?N = 1000N = 100N = 10How do you make this assessment?
23Sample Size People failed to appreciate the role of sample size. As n increases, variability decreasesJohn Nunley and I both got decent student evaluation scores last year (him: 3.87 me: 3.88I taught 3 classes and he taught 6Who is the better teacher?Explain how American professors get rated by students on a scale of 1 to 5.
24Example:A certain town is served by two hospitals. In the larger hospital about 45 babies are born each day, and in the smaller hospital about 15 babies are born each day. As you know, about 50 percent of all babies are boys. However, the exact percentage varies from day to day.For a period of one year, each hospital recorded the days on which more than 60 percent of the babies born were boys. Which hospital do you think recorded such days?
25Results from undergrad students The larger hospital (21)The smaller hospital (210About the same (that is, within 5 percent of each other) (53)DiscussMost subjects judged the probability of obtaining more than 60 percent boys to be the same in the small and in the large hospital, presumably because these events are described by the same statistic and are therefore equally representative of the general population.In truth – the large sample is less likely to stray from the population mean of 50%.
26Posterior Odds Urn is 2/3 Red RepresentativenessPosterior Odds Urn is 2/3 RedJoe’s Sample8-to-1 RedBetty’s Sample16-to-1 RedWho should be more confident that the urn contains 2/3 red balls and 1/3 white?Conclusion: People underestimate evidenceDon’t consider sample size.
27ExplanationIntuitive judgments are dominated by the sample proportion and are essentially unaffected by the size of the sample.Correct posterior odds:8 to 1 for the 4:1 sample16 to 1 for the 12:8 sample.Most people feel that the first sample provides much stronger evidence for the hypothesis that the urn is predominately red, because the proportion of red balls is larger in the first than in the second sample.
28Insensitivity 33. Misconceptions of chance (AKA the gambler’s fallacy)People expect that a sequence of events generated by a random process will represent the essential characteristics of that process even when the sequence is short.Example: People think thatHTHTTH is more likely than HHHTTT or HHHTH
29ChanceWe think that “chance” will be displayed “globally” and “locally”Imagine a roulette wheel at Vegas that has fallen on red for the last five spins…The next spin MUST be black… Right?RIGHT?We think black is “due” because it will look more like a representative sequence than if the wheel spins red.
30More on ChanceWe think of chance as a self-correcting process in which a deviation in one direction induces a deviation in the opposite direction to restore the equilibrium.In fact, deviations are not “corrected”, rather as the chance process unfolds, they are “diluted.”
31Representativeness: Gambler’s Fallacy Suppose an unbiased coin is flipped 3 times, and each time it lands on head. If you had to bet $1,000 on the next toss, what side would you chose? Heads, Tails or no preference?300 fund managers: no preference = 81%Of the BEE students:No preference = 17 of 23 (74%)Tails = 4 (17%)Heads = 2 (8%)What is going on here?
32The Gambler’s FallacySource of the fallacy?The coin has no memory and each side is equally likelyYou are betting on a SINGLE flip, not an ENTIRE sequence
33The Gambler’s Fallacy and the Hot Hand: Empirical Data from Casinos Rachel Croson and James SundaliJournal of Risk and Uncertainty (2005)AbstractResearch on decision making under uncertainty demonstrates that intuitive ideas of randomness depart systematically from the laws of chance. Two such departures involving random sequences of events have been documented in the laboratory, the gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand. This study presents results from the field, using videotapes of patrons gambling in a casino, to examine the existence and extent of these biases in naturalistic settings. We find small but significant biases in our population, consistent with those observed in the lab.33
34Insensitivity 4 4. Insensitivity to predictability: if predictability is nil, the same prediction should be made in all cases.Examples: which company will be profitable? What is the future value of a stock? Who will win the football game?What info do you have to make this assessment?
35Predictions are often made by Representativeness Three descriptions of a company: favorable, mediocre, poor.If mediocre description, mediocre prediction.The degree to which the description is favorable is unaffected by the reliability of that description or by the degree to which it permits accurate description.Predictions insensitive to reliability of evidence.
36Insensitivity 55. Illusion of validity: The unwarranted confidence which is produced by a good fit between the predicted outcome and the input informationPeople are more confident in their predictions if they perceive that the inputs look more like the outputs-no regard for limits of predictability
37Example: Accuracy versus Confidence People express more confidence in predicting the final GPA of a student whose first-year record consists entirely of B’s than in predicting the GPA of a student whose first year record includes many A’s and C’s.Basic statistics tells us we can make better predictions if we have independent inputs rather than redundant or correlated inputs
38Insensitivity 66. Misconception of regression: people don’t understand regression toward the mean. Consider two variables X and Y which have the same distribution. If one selects individuals whose average X score deviates from the mean of X by k units, then the average of their Y scores will usually deviate from the mean of Y by less than k units. Note: this was first documented by Galton more than 100 years ago.
39Examples throughout life Comparison of height of fathers and sonsIntelligence of husbands and wivesPerformance of individuals on consecutive examinationsPeople do not develop correct intuitions about this phenomenon1. They do not expect regression in many contexts2. When they do recognize it they invent spurious causal explanations.
40Pilot Training Example (Tversky and Kahneman (1974)) Pilot instructors note that…Praise for an exceptionally smooth landing is typically followed by a poor landing on next try.Criticism for a rough landing is typically followed by an improvement on next try.The verbal punishment and reward system is spurious.Conclusion: Verbal rewards are detrimental to learning, while verbal punishments are beneficial.
41Misconception of Regression ProbabilityWhat’s more likely? Improvement or an even worse performance?MeanPerformanceBad
42AvailabilityPeople assess the frequency of a class or the probability of an event by the ease with which instances or occurrences can be brought to mindExample: one may assess the risk of a heart attack among middle-aged people by recalling such occurrences among one’s acquaintancesOne may evaluate the probability that a given business venture will fail by imagining various difficulties it could encounter.
43Predictable Biases from reliance on Availability 1. Biases due to retrievability of the data: a class whose instances are easily retrieved will seem bigger than a similarly-sized class whose instances are less retrievableCar crashes versus airplane crashesFamiliarity: example lists of famous peopleSalience: seeing a house burningRecent-ness
44Bias of Availability 22. Biases due to the effectiveness of a search set: searching for words by first letterExample: Suppose one samples a word (of three letters or more) at random from an English text. Is it more likely that the word starts with r or that r is the third letter?
45Bias of Availability 33. Biases of Imaginability
46Bias of Availability 4 4. Illusory Correlation: Example mental patients with clinical diagnosis and drawings.
47Anchoring & Adjustment 1. What are the last four digits of your telephone number?2. Is the number of physicians in Wisconsin higher or lower than that number?3. What is your best guess as to the number of physicians in Wisconsin?
48Mean guesses of number of physicians AnchoringMean guesses of number of physiciansLast 4 digits of telephone #Sources: “Behaving Badly” (2006) and B.E. Class Survey
50What is going on?Anchoring – the tendency to grab hold of irrelevant and subliminal inputs in the face of uncertainty.If people are “rational,” there should be no difference between those who happen to have high telephone numbers and those who have low ones
51Subsets of AnchoringAdjustments to initial estimates are typically insufficient:Example: subjects were asked to estimate various quantities, stated in percentage (for example, the percentage of African countries in the UN).For each quantity, a number between 0 and 100 was determined by spinning a wheel in the subject’s presence.Subjects first indicated whether that number was higher or lower than the value and then to estimate the value by moving upward or downward from the given number.Arbitrary starts had marked effect on estimates
52Anchoring occurs also when the subject bases his estimate on some incomplete computation Example:estimating 8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1 versus 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8To do this fast, take a few steps and extrapolate, but because adjustments are insufficient, the procedure leads to underestimation that is predictable in each sequencemedian for ascending: 512Median for descending: 2,250Actual answer: 40,320
53Subsets of Anchoring 2Biases in the evaluation of conjunctive and disjunctive events: example:Simple events: draw a red marble from a bag with 50 percent red and 50 percent whiteConjunctive: draw a red marble 7 times in succession with replacement from a bag containing 90% redDisjunctive: draw a red marble at least once in 7 successive tries with replacement from a bag containing 10 percent red.
54Subset Anchoring 3Biases in the evaluation of conjunctive and disjunctive eventsStudy where subjects were given the opportunity to bet on one of two events.Three types of events were offered:
55Types of Events1. Simple events: drawing a red marble from a bag that is 50% red and 50% white2. Conjunctive events: drawing a red marble 7 times in succession with replacement from a bag containing 90% red and 10% white3. Disjunctive events: drawing a red marble at least once in 7 successive tries with replacement from a bag containing 10% red and 90% white
56What people didMajority preferred to bet on the conjunctive event (prob is .48) rather than the simple event (prob is .50)Subjects preferred to bet on simple event rather than the disjunctive event (prob .50 versus prob .52)Most bet on the less likely event!
57ImplicationsPeople use the simple probability to start and adjust from there, but they don’t adjust enoughNote that :Pr(disjunctive) > Pr(simple)>Pr(conjunctive)Due to anchoring: pr of conjunctive is overestimated and pr of disjunctive is underestimatedWhy do we care? Biases in the evaluation of compound events are particularly significant in the context of planning. The general tendency to overestimate the probability of conjunctive events leads to unwarranted optimism in the evaluation of the likelihood that a plan will succeed or that a project will be completed on time.Conversely: people will underestimate the probabilities of failure in complex systems.
58Other Heuristics Framing Hindsight bias Black Swans The Affect HeuristicScope NeglectOverconfidenceBystander Apathy
59FramingFraming refers to a situation whereby we fail to see through the way in which information is provided to us.In our pretest, I presented one question twice – two different frames.
60FramingThe U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. The scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows:If program A is adopted 200 people will be saved.If program B is adopted there is a 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved, and a 2/3 probability that no one will be saved.Which program do you choose?
61FramingThe U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. The scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows:If program C is adopted 400 people will die.If program D is adopted there is a 1/3 probability that nobody will die, and a 2/3 probability that 600 people will die.Which program do you choose?
62Framing Live prob. Die prob. Program A 200 1 400 1 Program B / /3Program CProgram D / /3Consistent Preferences imply:If you pick A over B, you should pick C over D
63Framing: Question #9 Question #12 When the question is framed in terms of saving lives, more people choose the certain option. When it is framed in terms of people dying, fewer people choose the certain option. This is a serious preference reversal. Economics assumes that preferences are stable!Indifference is problematic as well! Even though the expected values are the same, a certain value should always be preferred to an exactly equal expected payoff! There is no understanding there of risks.
64Framing at UCDWhen the question is framed in terms of saving lives, more people choose the certain option. When it is framed in terms of people dying, fewer people choose the certain option. This is a serious preference reversal. Economics assumes that preferences are stable!Indifference is problematic as well! Even though the expected values are the same, a certain value should always be preferred to an exactly equal expected payoff! There is no understanding there of risks.
65Over-Optimism (Over Confidence) Bias Do you expect to perform above or below average in this course? 79% say aboveAbove Average Below
66Results for over 300 fund managers Over-Optimism BiasSource: Global Equity Strategy, “Behaving Badly” (2006)
69Sources of Over-Optimism Bias? Illusion of Control (people think they can influence the outcome)Illusion of Knowledge (people think they know more than everyone else)Evolutionary Explanations of Overconfidence?
71Tendency to look for information that agrees with our prior beliefs. Confirmatory BiasTendency to look for information that agrees with our prior beliefs.Examples: - Iraq had weapons of mass destruction - God Exists (or God does not exist) - Corporations are bad - raising taxes lowers growth
72Evolutionary Explanations of Confirmatory Bias Failures of logic is an effective ploy to win arguments and winning arguments is an adaptive problem“Arguing, after all, is less about seeking truth than about overcoming opposing views…. So while confirmation bias, for instance, may mislead us about what’s true and real, by letting examples that support our view monopolize our memory and perception, it maximizes the artillery we wield when trying to convince someone… Confirmation bias “has a straightforward explanation,” argues Mercier. “It contributes to effective argumentation.”Source:
73Cognitive Reflection Task (CRT) Frederick, Shane “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4), 2005.Three Questions:- Bat and Ball Machines and Widgets Lilly pads
74First CRT QuestionA bat and a ball together cost $ The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?Bat + Ball = 1.10Ball = Bat -1.00Bat - Ball = 1.00Our class got a 61% on this question.Bat + (Bat -1.00) = 1.102 Bat = 2.10Bat = $1.05Ball = $.05
755 minutes Second CRT Question If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets?5 minutesOur class got a 52% on this question.
7647 days ! Third CRT Question In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. Everyday, the patch doubles in size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long would it take for the patch to cover half the lake?47 days !Our class got a 68% on this question.
77CRT Scores Mean CRT Score Group 0(%) 1(%) 2(%) 3(%) Sources: Frederick (2006) and B.E. Class SurveyCRT ScoresMean CRT ScoreGroup0(%)1(%)2(%)3(%)MITPrincetonHarvardBoston fireworksFund Mngrsucd(’13) (41%) 43% 15% % 23%
79Cognitive Reflection Task (CRT) Two parts of the brain:X-System (the default) – Reflexive part in charge of perception. It is an effortless, fast parallel-processing systemC-System – Reflective, in charge of thought. It requires deliberate effort to use and is slow, but logicalThe CRT measures how easy it is for people to interrupt their X-System style automatic response79
80CRT Interpretation People with high CRT scores are more patient What explains variation in scores across participants?People with high CRT scores are more patientThe CRT was positively correlated with people’s attitude toward riskPatience: devalue or “discount” future rewards less.More educated respondents were more tolerant of risk in hypotehtical gambles.
81Risk Attitudes and the CRT % choosing risky optionGambleLow CRTHigh CRT$100 for sure or a 75% chance of $25019% 28%$100 for sure or a 3% chance of $7,0008% %Lose $100 for sure or a 75% chance to lose $250In the domain of gains, the high CRT group was more willing to gamble – particularly when the gamble had higher expected value.For items involving losses, the high CRT group was less risk seeking; they were more willing to accept a sure loss to avoid playing a gamble with lower expected value.54% 31%Lose $100 for sure or a 3% chance to lose $7,00063% 28%Source: Frederick (2005)
82UCD Students CRT score of 0 or 1 CRT score of 2 or 3 Amounted need to win on toss of a fair die to balance 50% chance of $100 loss2011CRT score of 0 or 1$103.14CRT score of 2 or 3$152
83Keynes’ Beauty Contest You are going to play a game against the others sitting in this room. The game is simply this. Pick a number between 0 and The winner of the game will be the person who guesses the number closest to two thirds of the average number picked. Your guess is:This game was originated by John Maynard Keynes to explain price fluctuations in equity markets.Keynes described the action of rational agents in a market using an analogy based on a fictional newspaper contest, in which entrants are asked to choose a set of six faces from photographs of women that are the "most beautiful". Those who picked the most popular face are then eligible for a prize.A naïve strategy would be to choose the six faces that, in the opinion of the entrant, are the most beautiful. A more sophisticated contest entrant, wishing to maximize the chances of winning a prize, would think about what the majority perception of beauty is, and then make a selection based on some inference from their knowledge of public perceptions.This can be carried one step further to take into account the fact that other entrants would each have their own opinion of what public perceptions are.
84Keynes’ Beauty Contest Correct answer: 0Under the assumptions of rationality and common knowledge, this is the only Nash equilibriumx = 2/3*xx = 0 is only solution
85Keynes’ Beauty Contest: Answers of 300 Fund Managers
86UCD Students 2013 2/3 average = 2/3(33) = 22 2/3 average = 2/3(33) = 2286
87NPR’s Version of the Beauty Contest on Planet Money
88The Monty Hall ProblemYou are on a game show. You are offered a choice of one of three doors. Behind two of the doors there is a goat. Behind one of the doors there is a car. Upon you announcing what door you chose, the host of the show opens one of the two doors not selected by you, and reveals a goat. After he has done this, he offers you the opportunity to switch your choice. What should you do, stick or switch?