Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.

Published byGerard Riley Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the Chernobyl accident). From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

2 Figure 1. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for children and adolescents (0–17 y of age) at the time of the Chernobyl accident. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

3 Figure 3. RR by dose groups (point estimates, vertical lines—95 % CIs) estimated from the model (3) for children and adolescences (0–17 y of age) at the time of the Chernobyl accident; dashed line represents the value RR(d)=1+ERR d, where the ERR value was estimated from the models (1, 2). From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

4 Figure 8. Estimates of excess relative risk per 1 Gy (ERR/Gy), with 95 % CI, for recent thyroid cancer studies among children and adolescents, carried out in different time periods after the Chernobyl accident. (*) ERR estimates for the study periods 1990–2001<sup>(16)</sup>, 1998–2000<sup>(5, 18)</sup> and 1998–2007<sup>(17)</sup> are placed at 10, 13 and 17 y after the exposure, respectively; points at 10, 13 and 17 y are connected only for purpose of better presentation; (**) ERR, calculated according to the model<sup>(20)</sup>, for an age at exposure 8-y-old. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

5 Figure 4. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases (boys of 0–17 y of age at the time of the Chernobyl accident) and for healthy cohort members of the same age. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

6 Figure 5. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases (girls of 0–17 y of age at the time of the Chernobyl accident) and for healthy cohort members of the same age. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

7 Figure 6. RR of thyroid cancer incidence in boys (0–17 y of age) of different dose groups. Dashed line represents RR=1+ERR. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

8 Figure 7. RR of thyroid cancer incidence in girls (0–17 y of age) of different dose groups. Dashed line represents RR=1+ERR. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3): doi: /rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the."

Similar presentations

Childhood Thyroid Cancer in Russia Following the Chernobyl accident V.K. Ivanov Chairman, Russian Scientific Commission on Radiological Protection Medical.

Childhood Thyroid Cancer in Russia Following the Chernobyl accident V.K. Ivanov Chairman, Russian Scientific Commission on Radiological Protection Medical.
From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.
Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no
Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.

Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.
Figure 1. Joint effect of rs752822 and rs2735839 on prostate cancer aggressiveness and reclassification. (A) Joint effect of rs752822 and rs2735839 on.

Figure 1. Joint effect of rs and rs on prostate cancer aggressiveness and reclassification. (A) Joint effect of rs and rs on.
Figure 4. Sensitivity of illustrative simulated cumulative US deaths to cigarettes per day (CPD) reduction and to Excess Risk transition rates. See text.

Figure 4. Sensitivity of illustrative simulated cumulative US deaths to cigarettes per day (CPD) reduction and to Excess Risk transition rates. See text.
Figure 1. An example of an original simulation film used during the 1960s to 1990s to plan radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with field borders marked.

Figure 1. An example of an original simulation film used during the 1960s to 1990s to plan radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with field borders marked.
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.
Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate.

Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google