Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Published byPenelope Hancock Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no
Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no. (%) of participants. Group 1 comprised subjects aged ≥70 years who received zoster vaccine (ZV) ≥10 years previously, group 2 comprised subjects aged ≥70 years who never received ZV and were matched to group 1 subjects by 5-year age increments, group 3 comprised subjects aged ≥60 to <70 years who never received ZV, and group 4 comprised subjects aged ≥50 to <60 years who never received ZV. <sup>†</sup>ZV (ZOSTAVAX<sup>TM</sup>) received ≥10 years previously. From: Cellular and Humoral Responses to a Second Dose of Herpes Zoster Vaccine Administered 10 Years After the First Dose Among Older Adults J Infect Dis. 2015;213(1): doi: /infdis/jiv480 J Infect Dis | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, 1

Download ppt "Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no"

Similar presentations

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. Varicella-related outpatient visit rates by age group, MarketScan 2003–2012. Varicella was the primary diagnosis code for data shown. Annual.

Figure 1. Varicella-related outpatient visit rates by age group, MarketScan 2003–2012. Varicella was the primary diagnosis code for data shown. Annual.
Figure 1. Forest plot: overall estimate

Figure 1. Forest plot: overall estimate
Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.

Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)

Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Antibody responses against homologous 2013 H7 virus in H7N9-infected patients. A, Serum samples from H7N9-infected patients were collected at.

Figure 1. Antibody responses against homologous 2013 H7 virus in H7N9-infected patients. A, Serum samples from H7N9-infected patients were collected at.
Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Similar presentations

Ads by Google