1. Edgewood ISD 2012-2013

2.   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual Program Accountability  High Standards What is PBMAS?

3.  IndicatorStandardDistrictPerformance Level STAAR Mathematics70.062.01 STAAR Reading70.066.41 STAAR Science65.038.03 LEP Graduation Rate75.042.02 Bilingual/ESL Education

4.  IndicatorStandardDistrictPerformance Level STAAR Mathematics70.069.82 STAAR Reading70.069.82 STAAR Science65.045.92 Special Education Representation 8.59.91 Special Education

5.  IndicatorStandardDistrictPerformance Level TAKS Mathematics70.065.71 LEP TAKS Mathematics70.047.13 LEP TAKS ELAR70.033.33 LEP TAKS Science65.045.52 ECO DIS TAKS Mathematics70.065.81 SPED TAKS Mathematics70.040.93 SPED TAKS ELAR70.056.52 SPED TAKS Science65.030.83 SPED TAKS Social Studies70.056.72 CTE Dropout3.05.22 Career and Technical Education

6.  IndicatorStandardDistrictPerformance Level Migrant STAAR Mathematics70.069.81 Migrant STAAR Reading70.069.81 No Child Left Behind

7.  IndicatorProgramStandardDistrict Title 1, Part A Dropout 7-12NCLB2.02.4 SPED Annual Dropout 7-12SPED2.02.2 SPED Discretionary Placement ISS SPED10.0 Difference 22.2 SPED Discretionary Placement OSS SPED6.0 Difference 13.0 Required Improvement

8.  IndicatorProgramStandardDistrict Migrant STAAR ScienceNCLB65.041.7 Migrant Annual Dropout Rate NCLB2.03.6 Migrant RHSP/DAPNCLB70.0* Migrant Graduation RateNCLB75.060.0 Not Assigned and/or Special Analysis

9.  Met Standard Bilingual Education  BE STAAR-All Contents  ESL STAAR-Social Studies  LEP Not Served STAAR-All Contents  LEP Year After Exit STAAR-All Contents  LEP Annual Dropout 7-12  LEP RHSP/DAP  TELPAS Composite Ratings

10.  Met Standard CTE Education  TAKS-ELAR, Science, Social Studies  LEP TAKS-Social Studies  ECO DIS TAKS-ELAR, Science, Social Studies  RHSP/DAP  Graduation Rate

11.  Met Standard NCLB  Title 1, Part A STAAR –All Contents  RHSP/DAP  Graduation Rate  Migrant STAAR-Social Studies

12.  Met Standard Special Education  STAAR-Social Studies  Year After Exit STAAR-Mathematics, Reading, Science  STAAR Participation Rate  Least Restrictive Environment Ages 3-21  RHSP/DAP  Graduation Rate  SPED Representation-African American, Hispanic, LEP  Discretionary Placements DAEP

13.  Causal Factors for Low Performance

14.  Causal Factors Special Education  Limited progress through early intervention  Limited response to intensive research-based interventions  Disability identified that significantly impacts learning  Failure to consistently implement IEP  Poor IEP development  Rigor and relevance is absent from daily instruction

15.  Comments/Questions

16.  Causal Factors Bilingual/ESL Education  ESL STAAR passing rate at TAKS equivalent (3)  8 th grade science was 43% overall. The standard needed is 65%.  Academic language continues to be a challenge for ELL students.  LEP/ELL Graduation rate (2)  The three year average was 42%. The standard needed is 75%. Although rate is improving, we are still not at the required average.  Lack of credit accrual/recovery continues to contribute to dropout rate of ELL/LEP students.

17.  Comments/Questions

18.  Causal Factors Career and Technical Education  CTE students as a collective group score better than the EISD general population and above the state standard (except Math this year)  CTE/ELL and CTE/Spec Ed students score below target passing rate the due to their specific individual challenges. While passing rate is below state standard it is also below the State CTE/ELL and CTE/Spec Ed rates (next slide).  Testing data (benchmarks, comprehensives, and TAKS) not used to impact instruction.  SIOP strategies and differentiated instruction not used consistently.  Note: The population for these indicators is only 10 th and 11 th grade students coded a “2”. As student is coded a “2” if they are taking a sequence of CTE courses according to their 4/6 year plan. Not all CTE students count for these indicators.

19.  Special Pops CTE Comparison Subject (passing rate) EISD CTE/ELL State CTE/ELL EISD CTE/SEState CTE/SE Math (70)47.1%56.5%40.9%41.4% ELA (70)33.3%56.2%56.5%59.5% Science (65)45.5%51.6%30.8%48.4% Social Studies (70) 72.7%82.6%56.7%80.6%

20.   Increasing number /percentage of dropouts in the last 3 years. State standard is 3%.  2008-09- 12, 2%  2009-10- 30, 2.4%  2010-11- 40, 5.2%  Leavers not monitored by special population  Coding of CTE students not consistent from year to year. Note: The population for this indicator is all CTE students Causal Factors Career and Technical Education

21.  Comments/Questions

22.  Causal Factors No Child Left Behind  Lack of understanding of the depth of knowledge required by the TEKS  Lack of rigor in instructional delivery

23.  Comments/Questions

24.  GOAL: Create a district improvement plan to address causal factors of low performance  Folder contains:  List of Members, Roles, Guiding Questions & Improvement Plan Template, District Progress Report  Assign Roles  Use guiding questions to drive discussion  Create intervention activity  Fill out Improvement Plan Template  Use chart tablet to record activity to share with group  Each groups will have 5 minutes to share activity Group Activity

25.  Area Targeted Major Systems Components Strategy, Initiative, or Redesign Start Date Projected Completion Date Evidence of Implementation Resources Required and Persons Responsible State Assessment Instruction Rigorous and Relevant Template

26.   30 Minutes  http://timer.onlineclock.net/ http://timer.onlineclock.net/ Group Activity