Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Tom Vandenbrande & Fernando Pauwels(HIVA) Explaining the gender wage gap Workshop 5, June 23rd.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Tom Vandenbrande & Fernando Pauwels(HIVA) Explaining the gender wage gap Workshop 5, June 23rd."— Presentation transcript:

1 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Tom Vandenbrande & Fernando Pauwels(HIVA) Explaining the gender wage gap Workshop 5, June 23rd

2 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Gross wage gap in Belgium o Average wage of women, compared to the average wage of men. o Steunpunt WAV, based on register data on annual wage level: 20% o Konings, based on panel data on monthly wage: 25% o Sels, based on survey data on monthly wage: 26% o Wage Indicator data: o 18% when using hourly wage o 26% when using monthly wage

3 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 From gross wage gap to net wage gap o Regression analysis o Model: ln (gross wage) = a + b1.gender + b2.personal characteristics + b3. job characteristics + b4.organisational characteristics + b5.attitudes + e

4 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Characteristics considered o Person: experience, age, educational level, children, career past o Job: part time, hours, fixed job, blue/white collar, division, supervision, autonomy, pressure, complexity, occupation o Organisation: sector, number of employees, nationality employer, region, number of women, CAO (=collective bargaining agreement), active trade union o Attitudes: salary important, colleagues important, promotion wanted, wage gap too big, social dialogue important, satisfied with pay policy, satisfied with contract, easy to find another job

5 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Age o Age: +2,57% o Age²: -0,02% o Real wages above expected value o Older people in more interesting positions

6 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Experience o Years with employer: +1,1% o Years²: -0,0% o Salary decreases after 28 years with same employer o Cf. Auer, Berg & Coulibaly on productivity

7 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Educational level o Very important for wage level o University compared to low education: +31% o ! Not important for gender wage gap

8 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 # Reasons: family reasons, unemployment, education, army, sick # Only career break for family reason is significant for pay level. Wage punishment of 9%! Career break

9 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Part time work o Very important! 24% less pay! (also when actual number of hours is taken into consideration) o ! Very important for explanation gender wage gap

10 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Job Complexity o The more complex a job is, the higher the wage o Differences up to 10% for the most complex jobs o Other differences: division, supervision, occuational category

11 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Sectoral differences o Public sector pays better! o Commercial services pay not so good o Sectoral differences in graph: banking & chemicals vs. shops & textiles

12 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Small and medium enterprises o Big companies pay a lot better o Foreignly owned companies pay higher wages

13 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 # Materialism pays: ‘salary important’  higher wage, ‘colleagues important’  lower wage # Satisfaction (on contract, on pay policy)  higher pay # ‘Wage gap too big in my company’  lower pay # ‘Colective agreements are important for wages’  lower pay Attitudes

14 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 # Initial effect of a characteristic: effect on b(gender) when introduced in model with only gender # Marginal effect of a characteristic: effect on b(gender) when introduced after all other characteristics in regression model Effect on wage gap revisited

15 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 # Job is the most important factor to explain wage differences between men and women (14.4 ppt or 54%) # In other words, men work in jobs that pay better Job characteristics explain wage gap Effect Gender- Person4.2 ppt Job14.4 ppt Company5.2 ppt Attitude2.4 ppt

16 Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 # Part time work (28%) & hours in contract (16%) most important factor # Company size (13%) also very relevant # Other job characteristics: job complexity (12%) and supervision (10%) # Age (8%) & experience (8%) # More surprisingly: active trade union in company (6%), number of women in company (3%), career break (3%), ‘collective agreements are important’ (4%) Part time work, company size etc.


Download ppt "Wagegap conferencte Amsterdam, June 2006 Tom Vandenbrande & Fernando Pauwels(HIVA) Explaining the gender wage gap Workshop 5, June 23rd."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google