1. 05.04.06 1 ETCS Level 1 Deployment in Luxembourg UIC ERTMS CONFERENCE 2006 BUDAPEST 05.04.2006 François JAEGER Director CFL Member of the CFL board of Directors

2. 05.04.06 2 ETCS LEVEL 1 DEPLOYMENT IN LUXEMBOURG SUMMARY 0 - LUXEMBOURG GENERAL INFORMATIONS 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE 3 - PILOT PHASE 4 - ROLLING STOCK 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS 6 - OPEN POINTS AND QUESTIONS 7 - CONCLUSIONS

3. 05.04.06 3 0 - LUXEMBOURG General Information Luxembourg Territory: 2586 km 2 Population: ~ 451.000 Border countries:Belgium France Germany LUXEMBOURG

4. 05.04.06 4 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK Characteristics - CCSystems in Luxembourg / Neighbourhoods

5. 05.04.06 5  1973 CFL introduced crocodile system  1997 the implementation of MEMOR II+ (improvement of the crocodile system) whole fleet  1999 CFL decided to introduce ETCS Level 1 on the complete Luxembourg railway network and to equip the whole rolling stock fleet a German supplier including based on  2002 a German supplier got the order to install ETCS Level 1 on the whole network, including Infill functionality based on Balise a French supplier  2002 a French supplier got the order for the ETCS equipment of a pre-series of 10 engines 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK CCSystem in Luxembourg - History Project supported by EU

6. 05.04.06 6 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK Technical migration for ETCS LEVEL 1  No direct interface between LEU* and the Interlocking  Signal information picked up by 2 current sensors for each lamp  LEU also controls during migration MEMOR II+  Onboard ETCS EVC** controls the transitions between ETCS and MEMOR II+ (cut off in/out interface of MEMOR II+ system) * LEU Line-side Electronic Unit ** EVC European Vital Computer Balises MEMOR II+LEU AntennaEVC

7. 05.04.06 7 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE ETCS Level 1 and estimated costs  ETCS increases safety level on the network  ETCS achieves interoperability between Luxembourg and neighbouring countries  Same standard on the whole network  Fully compatible with TSI  Luxembourg takes a whole network approach (European wide a corridor approach, the Corridor C Antwerp-Basle/Lyon will accelerate ETCS development in the area and the RS onboard migration) for the entire network:  Total estimated costs for the entire network: 24.665.406 € (1999)

8. 05.04.06 8 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Migration  Migration duration : 5 years from 2003  Started with SRS* Version 2.2.2. + several change requests applied in first phase (pilot line)  9 phases are foreseen for ETCS deployment Deployment is line oriented  All main signals (v>40km/h) and distant signals are also equipped with Infill functionality (Balises)  Determination of the national values  Several changes introduced in the national operational rules due to ETCS migration * SRS System Requirement Specification

9. 05.04.06 9 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE National Values - Changes in National Operation Rules National Values Changes in National Operation Rules

10. 05.04.06 10 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Lineside Electronic Unit and Eurobalise Line-side Electronic Unit Switch-able Balise Signal Electronic Unit

11. 05.04.06 11 TROISVIERGES ETTELBRUCK LUXEMBURG KLEINBETTINGEN PETANGE BETTEMBURG ESCH / ALZETTE WASSERBILLIG Phase 1 completed (Pilot phase) 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE State of play Phase 2 completed LORENTZWEILER SANDWEILER DOMMELDANGE WALFERDANGE MERSCH LINTGEN HEISDORF CENTS-HAMM COLMAR-US BÜRDEN ETTELBRUCK DIEKIRCH SCHIEREN BISSEN COLMARBERG CRUCHTEN Phases 3 and 4

12. 05.04.06 12 3 - PILOT PHASE SUMM UP of the pilot line  ~50 km line equipped with ETCS level 1  10 traction units equipped with ETCS level 1  ETCS Version 2.2.2. + several change requests corresponding to subset 108  All problems solved on an international level, no national solution (UNISIG Group)  First tests with CFL D-railcar: December 2003  Commercial service: March 2005  Commercial train kilometres: ~ 16.600 km

13. 05.04.06 13 3 - PILOT PHASE Rolling stock - First migration phase achieved 2003-2005 Pilot phase started in 2004 with 10 engines 3 D-Railcar CFL 2100 (same as SNCF X73500) Equipped with ETCS: 12/2003 - 04/2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: 227 074,- € 4 EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) Equipped with ETCS: 09/2004 - 12/2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor (needs two equipments per EMU due to the length of the EMU) Cost per engine: 353 284,- € 3 E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) Equipped with ETCS: 05/2004 - 07/2005 Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: 260 144,- € Total costs for the 10 engines: 3 035 000,-€

14. 05.04.06 14 3 - PILOT PHASE Main goals achieved  Test components on - Infrastructure - Rolling Stock  Test of the system ETCS level 1  Validation of the system  Reduction of maintenance costs  Improved safety  High reliability level  No major train delays Project supported by EU

15. 05.04.06 15 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration 20062007 2008 18 EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+ Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* Cost per engine: ~300.000,- € 12 EMU CFL 2200 (same as SNCF Z 24500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 16 E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, TBL Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor* 18 Control trailer CFL DABpbdzfa A14 CCS-system: MEMOR II+, PZB (same as DB AG DBpbzfa 766) Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 20 E-Locos CFL 4000 (same as DB AG 185) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, PZB Use: Passenger / freight trains cross-border and on corridor* * corridor C Antwerp - Basle/Lyon

16. 05.04.06 16 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Roll-out phase will start when: - equipment prices are acceptable ! - and financing is secured ! (Railway Undertaking and MS + EU Funds)

17. 05.04.06 17 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Equipment of the Electric Multiple Unit 2000 DM I Driver Machine Interface EVC European Vital Computer Radar Antenna Speed Sensor Accelerometer

18. 05.04.06 18 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (1/2) + ~100 km (double/single track) equipped with ETCS + 10 traction units equipped with ETCS + No major problem to equip (INFRA + RS) + ETCS version 2.2.2. + several change requests corresponding to subset 108 + No national solution implemented + Changing operation rules to introduce ETCS + Commercial service from March 2005 (no major train delays due to the introduction of ETCS) + Commercial train kilometres: ~ 27.100 km + Increased safety level (MEMOR II+)

19. 05.04.06 19 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (2/2) + No relevant failures (INFRA + RS) + No interoperability problems between INFRA + RS (two different suppliers) + No interferences with actual system Memor II+ + End of MEMOR II+ by 2017 - Multiple Units need two equipments (additional costs) - Problems with homologation of ETCS RS on other networks (costs and time) - ETCS equipment for RS increases costs currently (costs of prototype and series) - Combined ETCS/National System are not helpful for Interoperability

20. 05.04.06 20 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (1/2)  Cross acceptance ! Re-examination of the rolling stock authorisation for the modified engines in the bordering countries (long lasting process and high additional costs)  Braking curves not unified !  Transition between the different CCSystems ! (No specific STM available in the worst case standing transition)  70% of the trains in Luxembourg are cross-border, traction units need several CCSystems !  Several data recorders within one engine to pass border (JRU, ATESS, DSK) !

21. 05.04.06 21 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (2/2)  Compatibility problems between ETCS balises and KVB on board equipment !  State of play of the RS migration of other RUs operating in the area ?  Retrofitting ETCS on RS is actually a high invest for CFL and other "ETCS RUs" !  State of play of MS and EU funding?  Funding prototype (fix costs) and series?  All traction units should qualify for EU funds? (Locomotives, multiple units, control trailers,.....)

22. 05.04.06 22 7 - MAIN CONCLUSIONS ETCS:  in Luxembourg is aligned on the EU policies  migration phase for Luxembourg INFRA assured  migration phase on RS is challenging (high costs, cross acceptance and different migration strategies of other RUs)  on the Corridor C Antwerp- Basle/ Lyon will certainly accelerate the migration in the area (INFRA +RS)  is expensive on INFRA and particularly on RS side  needs MS and EU funds for INFRA and RS  insures interoperability and is an important project for Luxembourg and Europe