1. Unless otherwise specified these slides are made available by OASPA under a CC BY 4.0 License Attribution Webinar 5 th May 2016 With thanks to Copyright Clearance Center for hosting today’s webinar Unless otherwise specified these slides are made available by OASPA under a CC BY 4.0 License

2. Attribution Webinar Attribution? Chair: Catriona MacCallum, PLOS Presentation:Cameron Neylon, Curtin University Panel:Ernesto Priego, City University London Mike Carroll, Washington College of Law Unless otherwise specified these slides are made available by OASPA under a CC BY 4.0 License

3. The Edges of Licensing ATTRIBUTION AND LICENSE TO PUBLISH AGREEMENTS

4. The point of Open Access is…?

5. …interoperability.

6. Licensing is key to this

7.  Expression of values  Legal consistency

8. Global usage drives interop

9. Licensing is key to this  Expression of values  Legal consistency Attribution is a core value of our community

10. Attribution is a core value… …but an inconsistently expressed one

11. Community Principles The communities of scholars that have adopted this statement ascribe the following statements of best practice for Attribution where Creative Commons licensed research content has been re-used. 1.We acknowledge the tradition of both freely giving knowledge to our communities, along with the expectation that contributions will be respected and full credit will be given according to scholarly norms. 2.The community expects that where a work is reprinted, collected, aggregated or otherwise re-used substantially that the original source, location and free availability of the original version will be both made explicit and emphasised. 3.The community expects that where modifications have been made to an article this will be made explicit and every practicable effort will be made to make the nature and scope of modifications explicit. Where a derivative is digital all practicable efforts should be made to make comparison with the original version as easy as possible for the user. 4.The community assumes that unless noted otherwise authors have not endorsed any republication or modification of their original work. Where authors have explicitly endorsed the republication or modified version this should be made explicit in a way which is separate to the attribution.

12. Standard forms of attribution? Examples of effective attribution when reproducing a whole article, book, or book chapter Article (at table of contents, citations): Hobaiter C, Poisot T, Zuberbühler K, Hoppitt W, Gruber T (2014) Social Network Analysis Shows Direct Evidence for Social Transmission of Tool Use in Wild Chimpanzees reprinted in full from PLOS Biology 12(9): e1001960 under the terms of a CC BY license. Original version available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 At article head: Social Network Analysis Shows Direct Evidence for Social Transmission of Tool Use in Wild Chimpanzees Catherine Hobaiter, Timothée Poisot, Klaus Zuberbühler, William Hoppitt, and Thibaud Gruber Reprinted in full from PLOS Biology 10(10): e1001960960 under the terms of a CC BY license. Original version available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960

13. Standard forms of attribution? At table of contents and article head: Speller (2011), Sciences et litérature, translated to French from Science and Literature, Chap. 4 in Bourdieu and Literature, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, under the terms of a CC BY license. Original version available from http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05 http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05 At chapter head: Sciences et Litérature John R W Speller, translated by A. Translator Translated from Speller (2011), Science and Literature, Chap. 4 in Bourdieu and Literature, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, under the terms of a CC BY license. Original version of original available under a CC BY license from http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05 http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05 At article foot: This translation from the original to French by A. Translator. The author has not endorsed this translation. Original English version available under a CC BY license from http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05 http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0027.05

14. Standard forms of attribution?  Is there a demand for standards?  What problem are we solving?  Is there a need for guidance?  What is the best form for guidance to take?  Who is responsible for enforcement?

17. Reading by Loïc Alejandro from Noun Project Licensor Author Licensee User Grants CC License Specifies attribution Agrees to attribute as specified

18. Reading by Loïc Alejandro from Noun Project Licensor Author Licensee User Grants CC License Specifies attribution Agrees to attribute as specified Grants license to publish Agrees to publish under specified terms Publishes document with license Attributes/cites

19. Reading by Loïc Alejandro from Noun Project Licensor Author Licensee User CC License License to publish Guidelines?

20. The License to Publish  Very different across publishers (what rights, what guarantees/services, versions of license etc etc)  Lack of awareness that this document matters (or even exists in some cases)  An area for standardisation or for competition?  Real risks of something going wrong (such as publisher having no standing in dispute) or at the very least confusion about responsibilities

21. Conclusions  Open Access publishing is about providing interoperability  Licensing is one way of doing this and is a strong part of the argument for CC licenses  At each end of the publishing process we have inconsistencies  We need to work out collectively whether a conversation on standardisation would be helpful and valuable