Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

By: David Gitz, EE, Electrical/Programming Team Mentor FRC #1208

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "By: David Gitz, EE, Electrical/Programming Team Mentor FRC #1208"— Presentation transcript:

1 By: David Gitz, EE, Electrical/Programming Team Mentor FRC #1208
Drive Systems By: David Gitz, EE, Electrical/Programming Team Mentor FRC #1208

2 Audience: Programming Team Members Electrical Team Members

3 Topics Wheels 2WD/4WD 6WD/West Coast Track Holonomic/Mecanum
Crab/Swerve

4 Wheels [2] Swivel Caster Ball Caster KoP Wheel Plaction Wheel
Omni-Wheel Mecanum Wheel

5 Configurations [3] 2WD 4WD 6WD Omni/Mecanum simple rear wheel drive
front wheel drive simple all wheel drive simple center drive 6 wheel drive tracked drive swerve/ crab drive other? Omni/Mecanum

6 2 Wheel Drive The Good The Bad Cheap; Kitbot is 2WD
Very simple to build The Bad Easily spins out Difficulty with inclines Loses traction when drive wheels leave floor

7 4 Wheel Drive The Good The Bad More easily controlled
Pretty simple to build Better traction The Bad Turning in place is more difficult Compromise between stability and maneuverability

8 6WD/West Coast [3] Typically, one wheel is offset from the others to minimize resistance to turning Rocking creates two 4WD systems, effectively Typical offset is 1/8” – ¼” Rock isn’t too bad at edges of robot footprint, but can be significant at the end of long arms and appendages One or two sets of omniwheels can be substituted for offset wheels.

9 Tracked [3] Pushing power increased Mechanically more complicated
Need to have adequate track tension Throwing a track and/or breaking one can be easy and very hard to fix Slower, much more power intensive Applications HEAVY duty pushing Climbing

10 Omni/Mecanum Mechanically as complicated as a 4WD System
A lot of times can substitute normal wheels for Omni/Mecanum in tight situations. Less pushing power, more maneuverable Control can be more complicated (especially with Mecanum) More parts that can break

11 Crab/Swerve [3] Extremely mechanically and program complex
Lots of parts to make/buy/fix Highly maneuverable Requires (normally) precise engineering Takes up a lot of space, uses a lot of motors Pure 4-Crab: 5 Pure 4-Swerve: 8!

12 Other Information Steering vs. Drive Systems
In FRC, there are no “Tank” Drive Systems. There is Tank Steering and Track Drive Systems. These terms are NOT interchangeable. Tank Steering: Uses 2 Joysticks, Left Joystick controls speed of Left motors, Right Joystick controls speed of Right motors. Arcade Steering: Uses 1 Joystick, controls speed of Left and Right motors together.

13 References Drivetrain_Fundamentals_v2.1 FRC_Drive_Train_Design_and_Implementation

14 Questions?

15 Homework 1. Describe the Drive Train FRC Team #1208 (us…) used in the FRC 2010 Competition. 2. Name 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage of using a Meccanum Drive System. 3. What is the difference between Tank Steering and a Track Drive System?


Download ppt "By: David Gitz, EE, Electrical/Programming Team Mentor FRC #1208"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google