1. Accessing and U SING D ATA SIG Schools September 20, 2012 “ Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement. ” February 2012 1

2. SLDS Grant Overview Current Status Data Use DOE Data Library Longitudinal Reports P+ Student Level Instruction Educator Evaluations SLDS Outcome 1 Sample Reports Your Feedback / Next Steps Agenda 2

3. SLDS Three Outcomes…. 1.Integrate e valuation system data elements into SLDS 2.Streamline District Data Submission 3.Develop web tools to view evaluation data 4.Create system to administer evaluation process 3 1.Data portal for Legislators, NH DOE, and general citizens. 2.Integrate Special Education database with SLDS. 3.Integrate DHHS data (foster and juvenile justice data) with the K- 12 SLDS. 4.Develop ROI indicator. 5.Create NH Dashboard. Expand upon the current district profiles. 6.Develop and deliver P+ training for new stakeholder groups. 7.Create a social network for data use. 1.Integrate Data for an Early Warning System. 2.Develop Early Warning Indicators and Reports. 3.Integrate data for College and Career Readiness. 4.Develop College Readiness Indicators and Reports. Note: Tracker and AB are paid for by state. LEA can purchase CC. Three primary outcomes will drive the work of the SLDS grant. Evaluation of Effective Educators Informed Decision Making College and Career Readiness

4. SLDS Current Highlights…. Requirements definition via inquiry from schools and districts, vendors and other states, associations and department staff. Definition and procurement of social networking infrastructures. Expansion of P+ data store. RFP process for trainers and technology development. 4 RFP for technology development. Integration of Special Education common data. Determination of business needs. Collaboration with postsecondary agencies and SIS vendors. Expansion of BOY data collection. Definition of early warning requirements via schools and districts. Work has begun, although funds are not available until September 15 th -- shhhh. Evaluation of Effective Educators Informed Decision Making College and Career Readiness

5. 5 It’s all about the STUDENTS!!! Data Use

6. What Drives the Data Environment… 6 Data systems must be able to address multiple perspectives and multiple levels of competency: The teacher’s perspective, the administrator’s perspective, the specialist, the district, the policy maker, the researcher, reporting requirements, etc.

7. Note: Pictures are from clipart. i4see Data Collection Using Data 7 Collecting & Using Data Our efforts began with the collection of data with an end goal consistently focused on the use of data.

8. The breadth of data tools 8 Access Education Data from the DOE home page (view the library books icon on the left panel (www.education.nh.gov).

9. District profiles (public data) 9 District Profiles provide aggregate data available to the public.

10. Performance plus: Student Level Data 10 PerformancePLUS provides secure student level data to the teachers and educators.

11. Longitudinal reports 11 Longitudinal Reports provide easy access to predefined aggregate reports.

12. Data Collection and Reports 12 Aggregate spreadsheets of data available to the public.

13. NARS (Detailed NECAP Reports) 13 Secure student level NECAP data available to districts, maintained by Measured Progress.

14. “Growth model” 14 Based upon the Colorado Growth model, aggregate school level NECAP growth data.

15. A Closer Look Longitudinal Reports Performance PLUS 15 Finally, we will take a more detailed look at the Longitudinal aggregate reports and student level Performance PLUS system.

16. Longitudinal Reports You can scroll down the page to find a given school or district. 16

17. Predefined Reports There are five predefined reports for each school/district. 17

18. Grade Comparison Over Time How do the results of each grade compare to one another over time? 18

19. Compare Subgroups For example, how do students with an IEP compare to students without? 19

20. Cohort Comparison Current grade 7 Cohort history compared to Grade 7 cohort history for state. 20

21. A Closer Look – New P+ Reporting Engine Longitudinal Reports Performance PLUS 21 Longitudinal reports provide quick and easy access to extensive aggregate trends. PerformancePLUS provides detailed student level access to custom reports and detailed student learning.

22. Performance plus: Breadth and Depth 22 P+ Enables multiple assessments, creation of local assessments, detailed analysis of student progress, history over time, extensive student attributes (e.g. 21 st Century, CaTE, Attendance, College Enrollment, Assessments, SAT, course schedule, etc.).

23. How are districts using P+…. 1.Performance Tracker – Extensive Reports – Item Level Detail – Student History – Individual Learning Plans – RTI 23 2.Assessment Builder – State and National Assessments – Item Bank – Online Assessments – Mapping to Standards – Local Benchmark Assessments – CaTE and Survey Style Assessments 3.Curriculum Connector – Curriculum Bank – Curriculum Mapping – Connection from Map to Assessment to Reports Note: Tracker and AB are paid for by state. LEA can purchase CC. P+ provide three separate modules. It includes much more than data reports. A new reporting engine provide easier reporting access!!!

24. Drill Down Reports 24 Create dynamic report and drill down to the student level detail.

25. 25 View student progress over years of instruction. Student Level Detail

26. Consider Results by Standard 26 View proficiency by standard across multiple assessments (e.g. NECAP and NWEA).

27. 27 Consider Results by Item Understand what released items students are having difficulty completing.

28. P+ Next Steps 28 There are items currently and progress and some potentials that are being considered. Moving Forward (sample of items) Promote new user interface (reporting tool) Push predefined reports to user’s home page Create training documents Develop Social Network Deploy regional and virtual training Hire Trainer(s) Include NWEA growth factor Create Student Outcome Reports for evaluations (e.g. SLO measures) Pursue Accuplacer

29. 29 Develop inventory of evaluation system data elements and integrate into SLDS (e.g. teacher roster, assessment data, competency data, survey data, etc.) Develop web tools to allow supervisors to view evaluation data ✓ 2 2 3 3 44 Evaluating Effective Educators Streamline District Data Submission (reduce effort for district) Create a system to administer the evaluation process 33 22 11 Potential Models P+ and EIS LEA Model that leverages P+ for student outcomes Other state-wide growth tools Fully LEA based model Outcome 1 of the SLDS grant is to develop tools that will help you with the Evaluation of Effective Educators.

30. P+ and EIS Model EIS could allow you to view your teachers in a school, view and track evaluation cycle, view and track progress and schedule to complete review. SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching 30 P+ would allow you to review student growth on NECAP as well as other national and local assessments, parent surveys, etc. The grant proposed building upon existing systems, but we can certainly recommend other options if they provide greater benefit to schools and districts.

31. Student Roster 31 Create a student roster for a teacher – to display multiple assessments and student growth data!

32. Any 2 Scatter Plot 32 Consider for example how students proficiency levels changed from 6 th to 7 th grade.

33. Professional Development & Support 1.Professional development is critical!!! 2.A social learning network could provide training and collaboration across the state. SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching 33 We are moving forward with professional development tools – to lead our implementations.

34. Questions – Your Input!!! What are you using to track evaluation status? What are you using to track completion of evaluation components (e.g. completion of classroom observation, growth reports, etc.)? What are you using to identify student growth results? Do you need tools to manage class-room observations, and other Charlotte Danielson domains? Where do you see the biggest need for data system support? Would you be interested in being part of an advisory group to help define these tools and support? If not on the advisory committee, do you have staff that work with data who would like to share their best practices? Other comments, suggestions. SLDS Grant -- The Evaluation of Effective Teachers Force of Effective Teaching 34 We need your input to ensure funds are spent to maximize benefits.

35. Contact us for Help 35 Mike Schwartz (general questions) (603) 548-8898 Michael.Schwartz@doe.nh.gov Cyndy Currier (i4see Submissions and P+ Training) (603) 801-0444 ccurrier@mac.com Irene Koffink (SLDS Grant) (603) 271-3865 Irene.Koffink@doe.nh.gov Karen Soule (Educator Evaluations) (603) 271-4196 Karen.Soule@doe.nh.gov Lauren Heiter (Educator Evaluations) (603) 930-9781 Lauren.Heiter@doe.nh.gov We are here to help, so please reach out for support, and with questions.

36. SLDS Grant Overview Current Status Data Use DOE Data Library Longitudinal Reports P+ Student Level Instruction Educator Evaluations SLDS Outcome 1 Sample Reports Your Feedback / Next Steps 36 Questions….(and Thanks!!!)