1. ETV from a verification and test centre point of view Perspectives and suggestions Christian Grøn

2. A digression

3. A simple example

4. The verification process Accessible for developers Cost efficient Continuous Relevant Comparable Independent Controlled Trusted and recognised Accessible for users Independent Controlled

5. An industry driven process Decision for verification Identification of competetive verifier Coordination of development and verification Test and verification

6. Suggestion for organization Test and verification center n - does the verifications Sector group n -compiles the requirements Sector group 3 -compiles the requirements European Commission -sets the rules Sector group 2 -compiles the requirements Sector group 1 -compiles the requirements Test and verification center 3 - does the verifications Test and verification center 2 - does the verifications Test and verification center 1- does the verifications Accreditation bodies control the center

7. How to get started Early access to the principles of process, organization and funding Establishment of verification and test center capabilities Development of support programmes for: –Consultations on market drivers and requirements –Verifications by small technology developers –Boosting the scheme during initiation And the EU ETV scheme will make a difference for the technology industry, the technology users and the environment by 2010! –Perhaps even letting us maintain the few inches lead over Singapore…..

8. Summary Technology verification should be initiated with: Local access Cost efficiency Industry cooperation Independence Surveillance Comparable results Coordinated requirements Transparent rules Fast acceleration

9. The latest detailed description