Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville."— Presentation transcript:

1 Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville

2 2 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Exploring QCD at high temperatures F. Karsch, et al. Nucl. Phys. B605 (2001) 579 Confined - fewer degrees of freedom Deconfined - more degrees of freedom ε /T 4 ~ # degrees of freedom T C ~ 175 ±8 MeV →ε C ~ 0.3 -1 GeV/fm 3 2 Quark-gluon plasma

3 3 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 The phase transition in the laboratory

4 ALICE CMS ATLAS LHCf LHCb 2.2 km 8.6 km

5 ALICE CMS ATLAS LHCf LHCb 2.2 km 8.6 km

6 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Workshop on Non-Perturbative QCD, June, 2011 6 Oct 2008 Split J. Schukraft 6 ALICE ~1000 members ~30 countries ~100 institutes

7 7 Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons Detectors: 18

8 8 Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons Detectors: 18 Trigger detectors: When do we have a collision?

9 9 Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons Detectors: 18 Trigger detectors: When do we have a collision? Tracking detectors: Where did the particle go?

10 10 Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons Detectors: 18 Trigger detectors: When do we have a collision? Tracking detectors: Where did the particle go? Identification detectors: What kind of particle is it?

11 11 Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons Detectors: 18 Trigger detectors: When do we have a collision? Tracking detectors: Where did the particle go? Identification detectors: What kind of particle is it? Calorimeters: How much energy does the particle have?

12 12 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 p+p collisions

13 13 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Pb+Pb collisions

14 Bulk properties 14 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011

15 15 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Centrality dependence of dN ch /dη RHIC data scaled by 2.1 PHENIX PRC 71, 034908 (2005) PRL 106, 032301 (2011) dN ch /dη = Number of charged tracks per unit pseudorapidity η = pseudorapidity = - ln[tan(θ/2)]

16 16 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Centrality dependence of dN ch /dη RHIC data scaled by 2.1 PHENIX PRC 71, 034908 (2005) PRL 106, 032301 (2011) dN ch /dη = Number of charged tracks per unit pseudorapidity η = pseudorapidity = - ln[tan(θ/2)] N part = number of participating nucleons

17 17 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 17 Transverse Energy Centrality dependence similar to RHIC (PHENIX) PRC71:034908 (2005) PRC70:054907 (2004) E T had from charged hadrons directly measured by the tracking detectors f total from MC to convert into total E T From RHIC to LHC ~2.5 increase dE T /d  / (0.5*N part ) Energy density (Bjorken)  ~ 16 GeV/(fm 2 c) RHIC:  =5.4 ±0.6 GeV/(fm 2 c) (GeV)

18 18 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 18 √ s NN dependence dN ch /dη/(0.5*N part ) ~ 8 2.1 x RHIC 1.9 x pp (NSD) at 2.36 TeV growth with √s faster in AA than pp dE T /d  /(0.5*N part ) ~ 9 in 0-5% ~5% increase of N part (353 → 383) → 2.7 x RHIC (consistent with 20% increase of ) PRC71:034908,2005 Grows faster than simple logarithmic scaling extrapolated from lower energy PRL105, 252301 (2010) √ s NN = Center of mass energy per nucleon

19 Probes of the Quark Gluon Plasma Christine Nattrass (UTK), Workshop on Non-Perturbative QCD, June, 2011 19 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011

20 20 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Probes of the Quark Gluon Plasma Want a probe which traveled through the collision Probe Medium

21 21 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Probes of the Quark Gluon Plasma Want a probe which traveled through the collision QGP is short lived → need a probe created in the collision nucleus nucleus

22 22 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Probes of the Quark Gluon Plasma Want a probe which traveled through the collision QGP is short lived → need a probe created in the collision We expect the medium to be dense → absorb probe nucleus nucleus

23 23 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Single particles Measure spectra of hadrons and compare to those in p+p collisions or peripheral A+A collisions If high-p T hadrons are suppressed, this is evidence of jet quenching Assumption: sufficiently high-p T hadrons mostly come from jets Unmodified spectra:

24 24 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Nuclear modification factor (R AA ) Unidentified hadrons- π,K,p

25 25 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Nuclear modification factor (R AA )

26 26 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Nuclear modification factor (R AA )  K0SK0S K±K± ~494 MeV/c 2 ~1116 MeV/c 2 ~140 MeV/c 2 K0SK0S π+π+ π-π- ~8.6 cm

27 27 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Baryon anomaly: Λ/K 0 S

28 28 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Baryon anomaly: Λ/K 0 S Recombination Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci.58:177-205,2008

29 29 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Charm nuclear modification factor D+D+ π+π+ K-K- 312 μm π+π+ D0D0 π+π+ K-K- ~123 μm C D meson ~1865 MeV/c 2

30 30 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Conclusions Charged particle production and transverse energy follow same trends as seen at RHIC Energy higher than experimental extrapolation, lower than many models High p T particle production suppressed to ~0.15 of what we would expect from scaling p+p collisions → hot, dense medium produced Significant suppression observed even for heavy quarks

31 31 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Backup slides

32 32 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Non-photonic electrons pp Beauty Electrons Beauty + Charm pQCD

33 33 Christine Nattrass (UTK), Southeastern Section of the APS, October 21, 2011 Charm cross section pp


Download ppt "Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google