Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LINKING LOGISTICS, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS: IMPROVING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE METRICS FOR SUCCESS OPP Office Advisory Committee May.

Published byNathan Stevenson Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "LINKING LOGISTICS, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS: IMPROVING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE METRICS FOR SUCCESS OPP Office Advisory Committee May."— Presentation transcript:

1 LINKING LOGISTICS, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS: IMPROVING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE METRICS FOR SUCCESS OPP Office Advisory Committee May 18, 2011

2 Central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM) Camp Supported 17 projects and more than 100 scientists Constructed in only 28 days; benefit of the Field Camp Standardization Plan Open for science 3 December – 26 January

3 IceCube Fully operational 86-string neutrino detector Exceeded original scientific expectations for detector size

4 Optimization  Field Camp Standardization Plan  Code waiver process  Simplified Operational Requirements Worksheet  SIP inventory requests feed into contractor databases for efficient allocations

5 Planning Improvements  AIL working with ANT to complete in-depth support reviews on large projects in advance of successful scientific review  Contractor working with PIs on feasibility studies in advance of proposal submission  AIL & Contractor staff available to consult; need to get the word out

6 Process Improvements  Support Information Package needs a refresh  Match worksheet structure and inventory to current practice  Science outbrief process needs to be more efficient

7 Current Metrics  Antarctic Support Contractor measures performance in aggregate  ASC does not track performance specific to each science project  NSF has GPRA metrics to track productive science days

8 OAC Assistance  Suggestions for how to define project success criteria with respect to contractor support  What support is most important to each project?  How do we measure that?  Suggestions for how best to receive feedback on support  On-ice or off?  Direct to NSF rather than through contractor?

Download ppt "LINKING LOGISTICS, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS: IMPROVING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE METRICS FOR SUCCESS OPP Office Advisory Committee May."

Similar presentations

Study of the States Telecommunications and IT Network Model January 22 nd, 2014 Molly ODonnell Telecommunications Services Division (TSD)

Study of the States Telecommunications and IT Network Model January 22 nd, 2014 Molly ODonnell Telecommunications Services Division (TSD)
E-inventory Establishing of an electronic inventory of Industrial Property Offices products for the purpose of disseminating their Industrial Property.

E-inventory Establishing of an electronic inventory of Industrial Property Offices products for the purpose of disseminating their Industrial Property.
FY 2015 Revenue Sharing Program Update January 15, 2014 Jennifer B. Debruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.

FY 2015 Revenue Sharing Program Update January 15, 2014 Jennifer B. Debruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) Replacement Planning Phase.

Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) Replacement Planning Phase.
20 April 2012 Proposal Review Process: Logistical Considerations for Antarctic Science Proposals 20 April 2012 Scott Borg Director, Division of Antarctic.

20 April 2012 Proposal Review Process: Logistical Considerations for Antarctic Science Proposals 20 April 2012 Scott Borg Director, Division of Antarctic.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.

NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.

An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
National Science Foundation Update Governor's Grants Office Higher Education Conference Bowie State University May 22, 2012.

National Science Foundation Update Governor's Grants Office Higher Education Conference Bowie State University May 22, 2012.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.

NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
ARRA Reporting. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Passed by Congress in early 2009 to stimulate the economy Main objectives of act Job preservation.

ARRA Reporting. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Passed by Congress in early 2009 to stimulate the economy Main objectives of act Job preservation.
CARA External Advisors Meeting April 2000: Post CARA planning Post- CARA Plans John Carlstrom, U. Chicago, Director CARA Talk Outline Vision Polar Astrophysics.

CARA External Advisors Meeting April 2000: Post CARA planning Post- CARA Plans John Carlstrom, U. Chicago, Director CARA Talk Outline Vision Polar Astrophysics.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)

National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.

April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
Office of Polar Programs Office Advisory Committee Meeting OPP Director’s Remarks Karl Erb, Director.

Office of Polar Programs Office Advisory Committee Meeting OPP Director’s Remarks Karl Erb, Director.
The National Science Foundation * Office of Polar Programs * United States Antarctic Program Division of Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics Future.

The National Science Foundation * Office of Polar Programs * United States Antarctic Program Division of Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics Future.
1 Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Access to Opportunities.

1 Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Access to Opportunities.
Clinician Reporting to Public Health Repository (Cancer Registry) Brief Profile Proposal for 2010 - 2011 presented to the QRPH Planning Committee Wendy.

Clinician Reporting to Public Health Repository (Cancer Registry) Brief Profile Proposal for presented to the QRPH Planning Committee Wendy.
USAP Safety and Health Gwendolyn M. Adams Associate Program Manager for Safety and Health NSF/Office of Polar Programs Polar Research Support Section.

USAP Safety and Health Gwendolyn M. Adams Associate Program Manager for Safety and Health NSF/Office of Polar Programs Polar Research Support Section.
Brian Stone Research Support Manager NSF/Office of Polar Programs Research Support Planning Polar Research Support Section Al Sutherland Ocean Projects.

Brian Stone Research Support Manager NSF/Office of Polar Programs Research Support Planning Polar Research Support Section Al Sutherland Ocean Projects.
Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee (AAAC) May 11, 2006 Vladimir Papitashvili Antarctic Sciences Section Office of Polar Programs National Science.

Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee (AAAC) May 11, 2006 Vladimir Papitashvili Antarctic Sciences Section Office of Polar Programs National Science.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google