2. Agenda I.Welcome and Agenda Review II.Summit Report III.Governance Rules and Procedures Approval IV.Regional Leadership Proposal V.Fiscal Agent or Direct Funding VI.Annual Plan Update VII.3-Year Plan Update

3. Summit in Sacramento Report Sylvia Thomas Tammy Guzzetta Michael Gray Michael Lerner JoDee Slyter

4. Governance Rules and Procedures Review of Key Elements: – Membership (8), 6 school districts, 1 county office, 1 community college district – Partners contribute to discussions and decision making process – Commitment of reporting any funds available for adult education Budgets in alignment with consortium plans and seven program areas Quarterly/annual expenditure reporting – Official governing board representation Governing board approved with documentation Alternate with prior notification – Participation in decision making Communications and distribution of information Key guiding principle: ABout Students, Collaborative Relationships, Collective Responsibility, Results Driven, Representatives of all Stakeholders – Equal voting rights per member, 1 vote per member Quorum of 5 members needed for action Tie votes result in additional discussion and revote – Decision making process: Information gathering facilitated by Point of Contact Open discussion with consensus model Public and partner comment opportunity Motion is made official vote by each member

5. Governance Continued – Decision-making Model Committee met to create draft Draft was distributed and posted Discussion and edits incorporated Vote of approval by members – Open, public meetings Agendas and minutes distributed to members and partners via email Agendas published on member websites Minutes published on member websites – Considering public comment Public comments encouraged at meetings and via email Public comments shared with members during discussions and considered – Distribution schedule of consortium funding Review of mandates and state regulations/guidelines Per comprehensive plan In alignment with regional need – Fund administrator or direct funding selection To be determined – Member additions and removals Additions based on state definition Removals based on inappropriate use of consortium funds, lack of reporting data, ineffectiveness or consortium objectives, or jeopardizing the efforts of consortium.

6. Riverside AEBG Block Grant Funding CalWORKS Credit / Non-Credit CCD Apportionment Other Grand Total AB104 Regional Allocation MOETotal CalWORKS 14- 15 CCD CalWORKS Adult/ROC/P Total ABE / ASEAWD CTE (Non Credit Only) ESLTotal Adult Correctional Funds (K-12 Only) Adult Perkins K- 12/COE/JPA Basic Skills Initiative SSSP NonCredit WIA Title II 2014 (All Grantees) Total Riverside About Students Consortium$3,845,793$0$3,845,793 $0 $3,845,793 Riverside CCD$0 $1,121,079$0$1,121,079 $12,310,200$0$8,442$412,363$12,731,005 $0$1,252,403$507,585$0 $1,759,988 $15,612,072 Alvord USD$0$133,495 $0 $133,495 Corona-Norco USD$0$441,645 $0$169,874 $0 $807,358 $1,418,877 Jurupa USD$0$503,695 $0$12,285 $0 $105,812 $621,792 Moreno Valley USD$0$258,444 $0$22,107 $0 $557,110 $837,661 Riverside USD$0$2,550,548 $0$133,361 $0 $917,980 $3,601,889 Grand Total$3,845,793$3,887,827$7,733,620 $1,121,079$337,627$1,458,706 $12,310,200$0$8,442$412,363$12,731,005 $0$1,252,403$507,585$0$2,388,260$4,148,248 $26,071,579

7. Bylaws Draft Standard format Details Governance Rules and Procedures Not required for submission with Annual Plan Components: – Name and Purpose – Membership – Meetings – Governance – Committees – Staff – Fiscal

8. Regional Leadership: Consortium Stability Review of Consortium Stability Overarching Theme Review of previous meeting discussion Presentation of formal proposal Discussion Schedule vote

10. Fiscal Agent or Direct Funding Fiscal AgentDirect Funding Consortium must roll up all members funding and report budget and quarterly expenditures to the State Consortium must certify that the grant expenditures have been prepared in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. Consortium must follow budget and expenditure plans as agreed upon by members according to the plan submitted to the State. Fiscal agent serves as a bank Processes allocation distributions via warrant or wire transfer Certifies grant expenditures prepared in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations Works with consortium to implement fiscal decisions made by members Is not an authority to approve expenses applied against the grant Is not the oversight for programs and fiscal decisions.

11. 5% Cap on Indirect Consortium dollars for 2015/16 = $192,290 Does not include MOE indirect which is available to recipients Available MOE indirect = $194,390 Maximum Indirect = $386,680

12. Annual Plan Update Summary of Program Year 2015-16 – Description of vision and goals – Milestones identified Services and Funding Allocations – Workbook, spreadsheets, tables Action Plan Outcome targets Integration of existing programs and transitions Regional Assessment Plan Addressing gaps Accelerating student progress Professional development Leveraging existing regional structures Budget by Objective Level of Services and Assessment of Effectiveness – Performance measures

15. 3 Year Plan Revision Executive Summary Updates and changes to Objectives 1 & 2 data for all 7 program areas Systematic Projection of AE system for 2017-18 – Placement into programs and services – Pre-apprenticeship training – Development of skills to assist k-12 academic students – Collection of data – Qualification of instructors – Alignment of academic content and curricula – Alignment of educational services