1. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 1 Plans for 2006 Installation October 27, 2005 Installation Schedule Laser Installation Injector, BC1/L1, Injector Spectrometer Installation Risks Conculsions

2. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 2 LCLS Installation Schedule Laser Commissioning May 31, 2006 Injector Commissioning Nov 2, 2006 BC1 / L1 Commissioning Nov 2, 2006 Inj Spectro. Commissioning Nov 2, 2006 L2 / BC2 / L3 Commissioning Oct 31, 2007 LTU Commissioning Jan 31, 2008 E Dump Commissioning Jan 31, 2008 Laser Heater to be commissioned with Undulator

3. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 3 Laser Cable Plant / Rack Installation Cable plant information received Mario 11/30/2005 Bid package completed Mario 12/16/2005 Award Bid Mario 03/31/2006 Start CablingMario 04/17/2006 Input from Subsystems Infrastructure info. Complete Doug11/15/2005 Laser Control info. Complete Sheng11/15/2005

4. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 4 Laser Controls Laser Safety – Patrick Bong Complete Design Review Order all PLCs and instrumentation Complete PLC Programming Complete EPICS Driver for the PLC Complete control database Complete displays Timing – Dayle Kotturi Design Review Complete driver Order EVG200 and EVR 200 Complete control database Complete displays Infrastructure – Doug Murray Network Servers and workstations

5. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 5 Laser Controls Motion Control – Sheng Peng Design Review Complete drivers Order all motor controllers Complete control database Complete displays Profile Monitor – Sheng Peng Design Review Complete drivers Order all cameras and camera controls Complete control database Complete displays

6. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 6 Injector, BC1/L1, Inj. Spectrometer Cable Plant / Rack Installation Cable plant information received Mario 03/31/2006 Bid package completed Mario 04/16/2006 Award BidMario 07/31/2006 Start CablingMario 08/16/2006 Input from Subsystems Infrastructure info. Complete Doug 03/15/2006 Temperature Control Stephen S. 03/15/2006 DiagnosticsSheng,Doug,Till 03/15/2006 TimingDayle 03/15/2006 Low Level RFDayle 03/15/2006 Vacuum ControlStephen S 02/15/2006 Power Supply ControlKristi01/15/2006 Personnel Protection Patrick B01/15/2006 Machine ProtectionStephen N 03/15/2006 Fast FeedbackStephanie 03/15/2006

7. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 7 Injector, L1, and BC1 Personnel Safety – Patrick Bong Use the existing PPS for the LINAC during this phase – new system needed for Injector Complete Design Review Order all PLCs and instrumentation Complete PLC Programming Complete EPICS Driver for the PLC Complete control database Complete displays Timing – Dayle Kotturi Design Review Complete driver Order EVR 200s Complete control database Complete displays Infrastructure – Doug Murray Network Servers and workstations

8. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 8 Injector, L1, and BC1 Diagnostics Toroids ( 2,3,0) Sheng Peng Profile Monitors(10,3,0) Sheng Peng Wire Scanners( 4,3,0) Doug Murray Beam Position Monitors(15,7,0) Till Strauman, Michael Cecere Bunch Length Monitors( 2,1,0) Sheng Peng Tasks Design Review for each of the diagnostics Complete drivers for all hardware interfaces Complete prototypes for each (Profile monitors are done) Order all diagnostic hardware Complete control database Complete displays

9. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 9 Injector, L1, and BC1 LLRF (4,2,0) Dayle Kotturi Complete prototype of embedded processor solution Complete Design Review Complete driver Order all processors Complete control database Complete displays Timing – (x,x,x) Dayle Kotturi Design Review Complete driver Order EVR 200s Complete control database Complete displays

10. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 10 Injector, L1, and BC1 Vacuum Control - Stephen Schuh and Tom Porter Ion Pump 40 I/s(25,0,0) Ion Pump 20 I/s(20,10,0) Ion Pump 8 I/s(0,3,0) Ion Pump 2 I/s(0,1,0) Cold Cathode Gauge(9,2,0) Pirani Gauge(9,2,0) Hot Filament Gauge(2,0,0) Convectron Gauge(2,0,0) F Gate Valve – not controlled (0,2,0) Gate Valve (Large Bore)(1,0,0) Gate Valve (Small Bore)(4,0,0) Roughing Valve – not controlled (5,2,0) Tasks Complete Design Review Complete valve controller prototype Order all PLC hardware, IOC, pump controllers, and gauge controllers. Build all valve controllers Complete control database Complete displays

11. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 11 Injector, L1, and BC1 Power Supply Control – Kristi Luchini, Paul Bellermo, Anthony DeLira, Dave MacNair Solenoid (03,0,0) Bends (29,4,0) X Corrector (11,9,2) Y Corrector (11,5,2) Quadrapoles (14,10,2) Tasks External Design Review Complete micro controller to replace the ethernet controller Complete VME prototype for power supply control Order all I/O All power supplies are ordered Build all power supply controllers Complete control database Complete displays

12. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 12 Injector, L1, and BC1 Machine Protection / Beam Containment System – Stephen Norum Determine a solution for this run – only a laser shutter to control Complete prototype of embedded processor solution Complete Design Review Complete driver Order all processors Complete control database Complete displays Fast Feedback - Stephanie Allison Determine a solution for this run – limited beam rate and number of loops Complete prototype Complete Design Review Complete driver Complete control database Complete displays

13. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 13 Injector, L1, and BC1 High Level Applications – Diane Fairley, Debbie Rogind, Sergei Chevstov OTR converting OTR and YAG x-y images to rms sizes, centroids, area-under-curve, etc. I think we want several different methods available: Gaussian fitting, asymmetric Gaussian fitting, rms calculations using baseline cuts, rms calculations using filtering, etc. Power steering of sections of beamline, including corrector strength and BPM weighting (available on SLC now, but questionable state Emittance measurements using several (3-4) OTRs, and/or using one OTR but many quad settings (quad-scan method). Many parameters extractable WITH error bars. SLC only handles wire scanners right now. Real-time difference orbit fitting by accessing the optical on-line model (e.g., DIMAD, MAD, or COMFORT) and extracting initial position, angle, and energy from N BPM readings (plus a possible kick source in the region as an option) - all is available now on SLC Transverse slice emittance measurements: This is almost free if the software is written properly. We simply do the same as emittance measurements, but first slice up the beam (e.g., in Y) on the OTR screen and extract (e.g., in X) the rms for each slice, feeding this into the nominal emittance fitting subroutines, then plotting emittance vs. slice number (and several other accessible parameters). This is NOT available on SLC now, but I (and others) have MATLAB code to do it, though it is not packaged conveniently or easy to use for others.

14. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 14 Risk Areas SLC-aware IOC is complete Timing integration and prototype is close BPM design is unclear – ESD prototype ready for test PPS PLC approach needs approval Use of micro controllers requires the quick selection of a platform and port of RTEMS support Use of existing LINAC equipment may limit operation and reliability Budget estimates need to be verified – limited contingency

15. LCLS Control Group FAC – 06 Installation Lcls-controls@slac.stanford.edu October 27/28, 2005 15 Conclusions We understand the scope of the work for 06 commissioning. The team is in place to achieve these goals. The largest risks are well in hand. There are several risks identified that need to be monitored. There is a lot of work to be completed this year.